Characteristics of Reviews Published in Nursing Literature: A Methodological Review

被引:5
作者
Toronto, Coleen E. [1 ]
Quinn, Brenna L. [2 ]
Remington, Ruth [3 ]
机构
[1] Curry Coll, Sch Nursing, Milton, MA USA
[2] Univ Massachusetts Lowell, Solomont Sch Nursing, Lowell, MA USA
[3] Framingham State Univ, Dept Nursing, 100 State St HH 320C, Framingham, MA 01701 USA
关键词
evaluation; integrative review; nursing; publishing; systematic review; SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS; PRISMA;
D O I
10.1097/ANS.0000000000000180
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Integrative and systematic reviews present synthesized research. Scholars have called for increased rigor and reporting in reviews. The purpose of this methodological review was to describe the characteristics of nurse-led reviews. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines directed the review process. Many reviews did not clearly report the search strategy used and methods for data extraction and quality appraisal, indicating that there has not been an increase in rigor. Authors of reviews are encouraged to report sufficient methodological details, so peer reviewers and consumers can determine whether the methods were rigorous enough to contribute meaningful results.
引用
收藏
页码:30 / 40
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Characteristics, trend, and methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in nuclear medicine A bibliometric analysis of studies published between 2005 and 2016
    Hong, Jung Ui
    Kim, Jun Ho
    Lee, Kyung Hee
    Lee, Minkyung
    Hyun, In Young
    Cho, Soon Gu
    Kim, Yeo Ju
    Lee, Ha Young
    Kim, Ga Ram
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (21)
  • [42] Effectiveness of flipped classroom in nursing education: A systematic review of systematic and integrative reviews
    Barranquero-Herbosa, M.
    Abajas-Bustillo, R.
    Ortego-Mate, C.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2022, 135
  • [43] Representations of disability in nursing and healthcare literature: an integrative review
    Boyles, Christina McMillan
    Bailey, Patricia H.
    Mossey, Sharolyn
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2008, 62 (04) : 428 - 437
  • [44] Effectiveness of continuing education programmes in nursing: literature review
    Griscti, Odette
    Jacono, John
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2006, 55 (04) : 449 - 456
  • [45] High-Fidelity Simulation in Undergraduate Nursing Education: A Review of Simulation Reviews
    Doolen, Jessica
    Mariani, Bette
    Atz, Teresa
    Horsley, Trisha Leann
    Rourke, Jennifer O'
    McAfee, Kelley
    Cross, Chad L.
    [J]. CLINICAL SIMULATION IN NURSING, 2016, 12 (07) : 290 - 302
  • [46] The reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of nursing interventions for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease - A systematic review
    Sun, Xiao
    Wang, Duo
    Wang, Mei
    Li, Han
    Liu, Bo
    [J]. NURSING OPEN, 2021, 8 (03): : 1489 - 1500
  • [47] An Audit of Literature Reviews Published in Australian Social Work (2007-2017)
    Strandberg, Thomas
    Simpson, Grahame K.
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN SOCIAL WORK, 2020, 73 (01) : 18 - 31
  • [48] GRADE Reporting in Systematic Reviews Published in the Urological Literature (2009-2021)
    Norling, Brett
    Jung, Jae Hung
    Hwang, Eu Chang
    Han, Mi Ah
    Khaleel, Sari
    Schunemann, Holger J.
    Dahm, Philipp
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 210 (03) : 529 - 536
  • [49] Systematic reviews can be produced and published faster
    Sampson, Margaret
    Shojania, Kaveh G.
    Garritty, Chantelle
    Horsley, Tanya
    Ocampo, Mary
    Moher, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2008, 61 (06) : 531 - 536
  • [50] Peer review in Nursing and Midwifery: a literature review
    Rout, Amelia
    Roberts, Paula
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2008, 17 (04) : 427 - 442