Characteristics of Reviews Published in Nursing Literature: A Methodological Review

被引：5
作者：
Toronto, Coleen E. [1 ]
Quinn, Brenna L. [2 ]
Remington, Ruth [3 ]
机构：
[1] Curry Coll, Sch Nursing, Milton, MA USA
[2] Univ Massachusetts Lowell, Solomont Sch Nursing, Lowell, MA USA
[3] Framingham State Univ, Dept Nursing, 100 State St HH 320C, Framingham, MA 01701 USA
来源：
ADVANCES IN NURSING SCIENCE | 2018年 / 41卷 / 01期
关键词：
evaluation; integrative review; nursing; publishing; systematic review; SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS; PRISMA;
D O I：
10.1097/ANS.0000000000000180
中图分类号：
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号：
1011 ;
摘要：
Integrative and systematic reviews present synthesized research. Scholars have called for increased rigor and reporting in reviews. The purpose of this methodological review was to describe the characteristics of nurse-led reviews. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines directed the review process. Many reviews did not clearly report the search strategy used and methods for data extraction and quality appraisal, indicating that there has not been an increase in rigor. Authors of reviews are encouraged to report sufficient methodological details, so peer reviewers and consumers can determine whether the methods were rigorous enough to contribute meaningful results.
引用
收藏
页码：30 / 40
页数：11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A review of the methodological features of systematic reviews in fetal medicine
    Knox, Ellen M.
    Thangaratinam, Shakila
    Kilby, Mark D.
    Khan, Khalid S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2009, 146 (02) : 121 - 128
  • [32] Assessment of nursing students' competence in clinical practice: A systematic review of reviews
    Immonen, Kati
    Oikarainen, Ashlee
    Tomietto, Marco
    Kaariainen, Maria
    Tuomikoski, Anna-Maria
    Kaucic, Boris Miha
    Filej, Bojana
    Riklikiene, Olga
    Vizcaya-Moreno, M. Flores
    Perez-Canaveras, Rosa M.
    De Raeve, Paul
    Mikkonen, Kristina
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2019, 100
  • [33] Health economic evaluation of digital nursing technologies: a review of methodological recommendations
    Huter, Kai
    Krick, Tobias
    Rothgang, Heinz
    HEALTH ECONOMICS REVIEW, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [34] Adherence to PRISMA 2020 reporting guidelines and scope of systematic reviews published in nursing: A cross-sectional analysis
    Torres, Gian
    Ledbetter, Leia
    Cantrell, Sarah
    Alomo, Anna Rita L.
    Blodgett, Thomas J.
    Bongar, Maria Victoria
    Hatoum, Sandy
    Hendren, Steph
    Loa, Ritzmond
    Montana, Sherihan
    Sumile, Earl
    Turner, Kathleen M.
    Relf, Michael V.
    JOURNAL OF NURSING SCHOLARSHIP, 2024, 56 (04) : 531 - 541
  • [35] Health economic evaluation of digital nursing technologies: a review of methodological recommendations
    Kai Huter
    Tobias Krick
    Heinz Rothgang
    Health Economics Review, 12
  • [36] An analysis of current practices in undertaking literature reviews in nursing: findings from a focused mapping review and synthesis
    Helen Aveyard
    Caroline Bradbury-Jones
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, 19
  • [37] An analysis of current practices in undertaking literature reviews in nursing: findings from a focused mapping review and synthesis
    Aveyard, Helen
    Bradbury-Jones, Caroline
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [38] Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions published 2012-2016: protocol for a systematic review
    Pieper, Dawid
    Pollock, Michelle
    Fernandes, Ricardo M.
    Buechter, Roland Brian
    Hartling, Lisa
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2017, 6
  • [39] Understanding literature reviews: a guide for enhancing nursing practice globally
    Butler, Sarah
    NURSE RESEARCHER, 2025, 32 (04)
  • [40] Bullying and the nursing profession in Australia: An integrative review of the literature
    Hartin, Peter
    Birks, Melanie
    Lindsay, David
    COLLEGIAN, 2018, 25 (06) : 613 - 619
12345