Characteristics of Reviews Published in Nursing Literature: A Methodological Review

被引：5

作者：

Toronto, Coleen E. ^{[1
]}

Quinn, Brenna L. ^{[2
]}

Remington, Ruth ^{[3
]}

机构：

[1] Curry Coll, Sch Nursing, Milton, MA USA

[2] Univ Massachusetts Lowell, Solomont Sch Nursing, Lowell, MA USA

[3] Framingham State Univ, Dept Nursing, 100 State St HH 320C, Framingham, MA 01701 USA

来源：

ADVANCES IN NURSING SCIENCE | 2018年 / 41卷 / 01期

关键词：

evaluation; integrative review; nursing; publishing; systematic review; SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS; PRISMA;

D O I：

10.1097/ANS.0000000000000180

中图分类号：

R47 [护理学];

学科分类号：

1011 ;

摘要：

Integrative and systematic reviews present synthesized research. Scholars have called for increased rigor and reporting in reviews. The purpose of this methodological review was to describe the characteristics of nurse-led reviews. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines directed the review process. Many reviews did not clearly report the search strategy used and methods for data extraction and quality appraisal, indicating that there has not been an increase in rigor. Authors of reviews are encouraged to report sufficient methodological details, so peer reviewers and consumers can determine whether the methods were rigorous enough to contribute meaningful results.

引用

页码：30 / 40

页数：11

共 50 条

[21] REVIEW OF REVIEWS: A NEW METHOD TO ADDRESS THE EMPIRICAL LITERATURE
Hernandez-Gonzalez, Osvaldo
Mejias, Barbara Ines Rondon
Gonzalez-Fernandez, Daniela Francisca
BIBLIOTECAS-ANALES DE INVESTIGACION, 2023, 19 (01): : 1 - 11
[22] Using NVivoTM as a methodological tool for a literature review on nursing innovation: a step-by-step approach
Rylee, Tina L.
Cavanagh, Stephen J.
HEALTH SERVICES AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2022, 22 (04) : 454 - 468
[23] Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions published 2012–2016: protocol for a systematic review
Dawid Pieper
Michelle Pollock
Ricardo M. Fernandes
Roland Brian Büchter
Lisa Hartling
Systematic Reviews, 6
[24] Methodological guidance for rapid reviews in healthcare: A scoping review
Speckemeier, Christian
Niemann, Anja
Wasem, Juergen
Buchberger, Barbara
Neusser, Silke
RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2022, 13 (04) : 394 - 404
[25] Types and associated methodologies of overviews of reviews in health care: a methodological study with published examples
Bougioukas, Konstantinos I.
Pamporis, Konstantinos
Vounzoulaki, Elpida
Karagiannis, Thomas
Haidich, Anna -Bettina
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2023, 153 : 13 - 25
[26] Critical thinking in nursing: Scoping review of the literature
Zuriguel Perez, Esperanza
Lluch Canut, Maria Teresa
Falco Pegueroles, Anna
Puig Llobet, Montserrat
Moreno Arroyo, Carmen
Roldan Merino, Juan
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING PRACTICE, 2015, 21 (06) : 820 - 830
[27] Emotional intelligence and nursing: An integrative literature review
Smith, Karen Bulmer
Profetto-McGrath, Joanne
Cummings, Greta G.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2009, 46 (12) : 1624 - 1636
[28] A review of prospective registration of trials published in nursing science journals in 2017
Gray, Richard
Gray, George
Brown, Ellie
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2019, 75 (12) : 3263 - 3271
[29] Causal assessment in evidence synthesis: A methodological review of reviews
Shimonovich, Michal
Pearce, Anna
Thomson, Hilary
Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal
RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2022, 13 (04) : 405 - 423
[30] Using NVivoTM as a methodological tool for a literature review on nursing innovation: a step-by-step approach
Tina L. Rylee
Stephen J Cavanagh
Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, 2022, 22 : 454 - 468

← 1 2 3 4 5 →