Popularity and Adolescent Friendship Networks: Selection and Influence Dynamics

被引:109
作者
Dijkstra, Jan Kornelis [1 ,2 ]
Cillessen, Antonius H. N. [3 ,4 ]
Borch, Casey [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Dept Sociol, NL-9712 TG Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen, Interuniv Ctr Social Sci Theory & Methodol, NL-9712 TG Groningen, Netherlands
[3] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Dept Dev Psychol, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[4] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Inst Behav Sci, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[5] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Sociol, Birmingham, AL USA
关键词
peer status; popularity; friendship networks; peer influence; longitudinal social network analyses (SIENA); PERCEIVED POPULARITY; DEVELOPMENTAL-CHANGES; RELATIONAL AGGRESSION; ACADEMIC-ACHIEVEMENT; SOCIOMETRIC STATUS; DELINQUENT PEERS; SOCIAL-DOMINANCE; SAME-GENDER; BEHAVIOR; ROLES;
D O I
10.1037/a0030098
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
This study examined the dynamics of popularity in adolescent friendship networks across 3 years in middle school. Longitudinal social network modeling was used to identify selection and influence in the similarity of popularity among friends. It was argued that lower status adolescents strive to enhance their status through befriending higher status adolescents, whereas higher status adolescents strive to maintain their status by keeping lower status adolescents at a distance. The results largely supported these expectations. Selection partially accounted for similarity in popularity among friends; adolescents preferred to affiliate with similar-status or higher status peers, reinforcing the attractiveness of popular adolescents and explaining stability of popularity at the individual level. Influence processes also accounted for similarity in popularity over time, showing that peers increase in popularity and become more similar to their friends. The results showed how selection and influence processes account for popularity dynamics in adolescent networks over time.
引用
收藏
页码:1242 / 1252
页数:11
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]  
Adler P.A., 1998, Peer power: Preadolescent culture and identity
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1996, VERKLARENDE SOCIOLOG
[3]  
Brown B.B., 1994, PERSONAL RELATIONSHI, P123
[4]   PEER-GROUP AFFILIATION AND ADOLESCENT SELF-ESTEEM - AN INTEGRATION OF EGO-IDENTITY AND SYMBOLIC-INTERACTION THEORIES [J].
BROWN, BB ;
LOHR, MJ .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1987, 52 (01) :47-55
[5]   Beyond dyadic interdependence: Actor-oriented models for co-evolving social networks and individual behaviors [J].
Burk, William J. ;
Steglich, Christian E. G. ;
Snijders, A. B. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DEVELOPMENT, 2007, 31 (04) :397-404
[6]   Direct and indirect aggression during childhood and adolescence: A meta-analytic review of gender differences, intercorrelations, and relations to maladjustment [J].
Card, Noel A. ;
Stucky, Brian D. ;
Sawalani, Gita M. ;
Little, Todd D. .
CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 2008, 79 (05) :1185-1229
[7]   2 INDIRECT TACTICS OF IMAGE MANAGEMENT - BASKING AND BLASTING [J].
CIALDINI, RB ;
RICHARDSON, KD .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1980, 39 (03) :406-415
[8]   Understanding popularity in the peer system [J].
Cillessen, AHN ;
Rose, AJ .
CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2005, 14 (02) :102-105
[9]   From censure to reinforcement: Developmental changes in the association between aggression and social status [J].
Cillessen, AHN ;
Mayeux, L .
CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 2004, 75 (01) :147-163
[10]   Developmental trajectories of adolescent popularity: A growth curve modelling analysis [J].
Cillessen, Antonius H. N. ;
Borch, Casey .
JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENCE, 2006, 29 (06) :935-959