Psychological intervention and health outcomes among women treated for breast cancer: A review of stress pathways and biological mediators

被引:95
作者
McGregor, Bonnie A. [2 ]
Antoni, Michael H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Miami, Dept Psychol, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
[2] Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, Div Publ Hlth Sci, Seattle, WA USA
关键词
Psychosocial intervention; Breast cancer; Stress and psychological adaptation; Neuroendocrine; Immunologic; Health outcomes; TO-HIP RATIO; SOCIAL SUPPORT; NATURAL-KILLER; IMMUNE-SYSTEM; PSYCHOSOCIAL INTERVENTIONS; MANAGEMENT INTERVENTION; INSOMNIA SECONDARY; CELL-ACTIVITY; DNA-DAMAGE; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.bbi.2008.08.002
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Breast cancer is a common cancer among American women. The diagnosis, treatment, and the challenges of survivorship all have potential to increase women's levels of distress to levels that might influence their adaptation and possibly the course of their disease. Psychological distress can influence tumor progression via many different pathways (e.g., genetic changes, immune surveillance, pro-angiogenic processes). Psychological intervention has been shown to facilitate psychological adaptation to breast cancer. But can psychological intervention influence cancer relevant biological outcomes among breast cancer survivors? We review the literature on how psychological intervention can influence cancer relevant biological outcomes among breast cancer patients. We limited the present review to randomized controlled trials reported in the past 6 years that tested the effects of psychological intervention on biological dependent variables among patients with non-metastatic breast cancer. There are data to suggest that psychological intervention can influence neuroendocrine (e.g., cortisol) and immune function indicators, especially lymphocyte proliferation and TH1 cytokine production. Future psychological intervention studies should also focus on more newly discovered stress-tumor pathways (e.g., neuroendocrine processes promoting tumor growth and metastasis) and follow larger cohorts of the more vulnerable patients over longer periods to evaluate the biobehavioral mechanisms and lasting effects of these interventions on health and quality of life. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:159 / 166
页数:8
相关论文
共 77 条
[41]  
Lutgendorf SK, 2003, BRAIN BEHAV IMMUN, V17, pS106
[42]   Vascular endothelial growth factor and social support in patients with ovarian carcinoma [J].
Lutgendorf, SK ;
Johnsen, EL ;
Cooper, B ;
Anderson, B ;
Sorosky, JI ;
Buller, RE ;
Sood, AK .
CANCER, 2002, 95 (04) :808-815
[43]  
Maestroni GJM, 2000, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V917, P29
[44]   Mammary cancer and social interactions: Identifying multiple environments that regulate gene expression throughout the life span [J].
McClintock, MK ;
Conzen, SD ;
Gehlert, S ;
Masi, C ;
Olopade, F .
JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY SERIES B-PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2005, 60 :32-41
[45]   Protective and damaging effects of stress mediators [J].
McEwen, BS .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1998, 338 (03) :171-179
[46]   Cognitive-behavioral stress management increases benefit finding and immune function among women with early-stage breast cancer [J].
McGregor, BA ;
Antoni, MH ;
Boyers, A ;
Alferi, SM ;
Blomberg, BB ;
Carver, CS .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 2004, 56 (01) :1-8
[47]   T-CELL IMMUNOTHERAPY OF CANCER [J].
MELIEF, CJM ;
KAST, WM .
RESEARCH IN IMMUNOLOGY, 1991, 142 (5-6) :425-429
[48]   EFFECTS OF PSYCHOSOCIAL INTERVENTIONS WITH ADULT CANCER-PATIENTS - A METAANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED EXPERIMENTS [J].
MEYER, TJ ;
MARK, MM .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 14 (02) :101-108
[49]   Neuroendocrine-immune mechanisms of behavioral comorbidities in patients with cancer [J].
Miller, Andrew H. ;
Ancoli-Israel, Sonia ;
Bower, Julienne E. ;
Capuron, Lucile ;
Irwin, Michael R. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 26 (06) :971-982
[50]   Psychological interventions and the immune system: A meta-analytic review and critique [J].
Miller, GE ;
Cohen, S .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 20 (01) :47-63