The Many Views of a Process: Toward a Process Architecture Framework for Product Development Processes

被引:50
作者
Browning, Tyson R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas Christian Univ, Neeley Sch Business, Ft Worth, TX 76129 USA
关键词
program management; project management; process modeling; architecture framework; views; SYSTEMS; MODELS; ENTERPRISE;
D O I
10.1002/sys.20109
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
A product or system development process is a kind of complex system, arguably even more complex than the system it produces. Yet, the models and tools used by systems engineers and program managers to plan and manage technical work-such as process flowcharts, Gantt charts, work breakdown structures, and text-rendered procedures-are less sophisticated and capable than the ones used to design the product system. When used, the various process models are often challenged to incorporate and maintain synchronized program information-e.g., they may be created by different subgroups in a program and based on different assumptions, and they may diverge as a program proceeds. Recently, architecture frameworks (AFs) have been used to help manage the complexity in engineered systems. An AF provides a portfolio of views of a complex system, each of which describes it partially and in a format meaningful to its users and their particular needs. This paper proposes the application of AF concepts to the management of the work done to develop a complex system product. The pieces of work and their relationships constitute a complex process. A portfolio of integrated and synchronized views of a single process model would seem to be preferable to the current state-a number of disparate and uncoordinated management models. This paper introduces a new application of AFs to development processes and suggests this area as one for further research and development in the systems engineering community. (c) 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Syst Eng 12: 69-90, 2009
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 90
页数:22
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Handbook on enterprise architecture
[2]   Metagraphs in hierarchical modeling [J].
Basu, A ;
Blanning, RW ;
Shtub, A .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1997, 43 (05) :623-639
[3]  
Bond T.C., 1999, Business Process Management Journal, V5, P164
[4]  
BOX G.E.P., 1979, Robustness in Statistics, P201, DOI [10.1016/B978-0-12-438150-6.50018-2, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-438150-6.50018-2]
[5]  
Browning T. R., 2006, Systems Engineering, V9, P104, DOI 10.1002/sys.20047
[6]   Modeling impacts of process architecture on cost and schedule risk in product development [J].
Browning, TR ;
Eppinger, SD .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2002, 49 (04) :428-442
[7]   Applying the design structure matrix to system decomposition and integration problems: A review and new directions [J].
Browning, TR .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2001, 48 (03) :292-306
[8]  
Browning TR, 2007, PROD OPER MANAG, V16, P217, DOI 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2007.tb00177.x
[9]   Making process visible: A grammatical approach to managing design processes [J].
Chung, MJ ;
Kwon, P ;
Pentland, BT .
JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 2002, 124 (03) :364-374
[10]   PERSPECTIVE - 3RD-GENERATION NEW PRODUCT PROCESSES [J].
COOPER, RG .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 1994, 11 (01) :3-14