Evaluation of alveolar bone loss following rapid maxillary expansion using cone-beam computed tomography

被引:58
作者
Baysal, Asli [1 ]
Uysal, Tancan [1 ]
Veli, Ilknur [1 ]
Ozer, Torun [2 ]
Karadede, Irfan [3 ]
Hekimoglu, Seyit
机构
[1] Izmir Katip Celebi Univ, Dept Orthodont, Fac Dent, TR-35640 Izmir, Turkey
[2] Adnan Menderes Univ, Dept Orthodont, Fac Dent, Aydin, Turkey
[3] Dicle Univ, Dept Orthodont, Fac Dent, Diyarbakir, Turkey
关键词
Rapid maxillary expansion; Cone-beam computed tomography; Periodontium; SURFACE RESORPTION; DENTAL RESPONSE; ROOT RESORPTION; SKELETAL; DEHISCENCES; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.4041/kjod.2013.43.2.83
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the changes in cortical bone thickness, alveolar bone height, and the incidence of dehiscence and fenestration in the surrounding alveolar bone of posterior teeth after rapid maxillary expansion (RME) treatment using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Methods: The CBCT records of 20 subjects (9 boys, mean age: 13.97 +/- 1.17 years; 11 girls, mean age: 13.53 +/- 2.12 year) that underwent RME were selected from the archives. CBCT scans had been taken before (T1) and after (T2) the RME. Moreover, 10 of the subjects had 6-month retention (T3) records. We used the CBCT data to evaluate the buccal and palatal aspects of the canines, first and second premolars, and the first molars at 3 vertical levels. The cortical bone thickness and alveolar bone height at T1 and T2 were evaluated with the paired-samples t-test or the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Repeated measure ANOVA or the Friedman test was used to evaluate the statistical significance at T1, T2, and T3. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: The buccal cortical bone thickness decreased gradually from baseline to the end of the retention period. After expansion, the buccal alveolar bone height was reduced significantly; however, this change was not statistically significant after the 6-month retention period. During the course of the treatment, the incidence of dehiscence and fenestration increased and decreased, respectively. Conclusions: RME may have detrimental effects on the supporting alveolar bone, since the thickness and height of the buccal alveolar bone decreased during the retention period.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 95
页数:13
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1961, ANGLE ORTHOD, V31, P73
[2]   RAPID MAXILLARY EXPANSION AND EXTERNAL ROOT RESORPTION IN MAN - A SCANNING ELECTRON-MICROSCOPE STUDY [J].
BARBER, AF ;
SIMS, MR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1981, 79 (06) :630-652
[3]   Evaluation of root resorption following rapid maxillary expansion using cone-beam computed tomography [J].
Baysal, Asli ;
Karadede, Irfan ;
Hekimoglu, Seyit ;
Ucar, Faruk ;
Ozer, Torun ;
Veli, Ilknur ;
Uysal, Tancan .
ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2012, 82 (03) :488-494
[4]   SLOW MAXILLARY EXPANSION - SKELETAL VERSUS DENTAL RESPONSE TO LOW MAGNITUDE FORCE IN MACACA-MULATTA [J].
COTTON, LA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1978, 73 (01) :1-23
[5]   MINERALIZATION IN MID-PALATAL SUTURE AFTER ORTHODONTIC EXPANSION [J].
EKSTROM, C ;
HENRIKSON, CO ;
JENSEN, R .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1977, 71 (04) :449-455
[6]   EFFECTS OF INCISOR REPOSITIONING ON MONKEY PERIODONTIUM AFTER EXPANSION THROUGH THE CORTICAL PLATE [J].
ENGELKING, G ;
ZACHRISSON, BU .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1982, 82 (01) :23-32
[7]   Dehiscence and fenestration in patients with Class I and Class II Division 1 malocclusion assessed with cone-beam computed tomography COMMENT [J].
Evangelista, Karine ;
Vasconcelos, Karla de Faria ;
Bumann, Axel ;
Hirsch, Edgar ;
Nitka, Margarita ;
Garcia Silva, Maria Alves .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2010, 138 (02) :133-135
[8]   ASSESSMENT OF THE DENTATE ALVEOLAR PROCESS WITH HIGH-RESOLUTION COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY [J].
FUHRMANN, RAW ;
WEHRBEIN, H ;
LANGEN, HJ ;
DIEDRICH, PR .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 1995, 24 (01) :50-54
[9]  
Garib DG, 2005, ANGLE ORTHOD, V75, P548
[10]  
Graber TM, 1969, CURRENT ORTHODONTIC, V11