Veiled preferences and cryptic female choice could underlie the origin of novel sexual traits

被引:11
作者
Moehring, Amanda J. [1 ]
Boughman, Janette W. [2 ]
机构
[1] Western Univ, Dept Biol, London, ON N6A 5B7, Canada
[2] Michigan State Univ, Ecol Evolutionary Biol & Behav Program, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
关键词
cryptic female choice; novel male mating trait; novel female mate preference; sexual selection; SENSORY BIAS; MATE CHOICE; MATING PREFERENCE; GENETIC QUALITY; SELECTION; EVOLUTION; SPERM; SPECIATION; STRENGTH; SIGNALS;
D O I
10.1098/rsbl.2018.0878
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Males in many species have elaborated sexual traits that females strongly prefer, and these traits often conspicuously differ among species. How novel preferences and traits originate, however, is a challenging evolutionary problem because the initial appearance of only the female preference or only the male trait should reduce the ability to find a suitable mate, which could reduce fitness for individuals possessing those novel alleles. Here, we present a hypothesis for how novel preferences, as well as the novel male traits that females prefer, can originate, be favoured and spread in polyandrous species. Novel preference mutations can arise as 'veiled preferences' that are not expressed when the corresponding male trait is not present in the population, allowing preferences to be hidden from selection, and thus persist. In those cases when a male trait is present, veiled preferences provide a selective advantage, and females disproportionately produce offspring from preferred males through either mate choice or cryptic female choice. This tips the fitness advantage for novel males, allowing both preference and trait to spread, and limiting selection against them in the absence of the corresponding trait or preference.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   FEMALE CHOICE SELECTS FOR EXTREME TAIL LENGTH IN A WIDOWBIRD [J].
ANDERSSON, M .
NATURE, 1982, 299 (5886) :818-820
[2]  
Andersson Malte, 1994
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1996, FEMALE CONTROL SEXUA
[4]  
Arnold SJ, 1987, EVOLUTION SEX ITS CO
[5]   SEQUENTIAL FEMALE CHOICE AND THE PREVIOUS MALE EFFECT IN STICKLEBACKS [J].
BAKKER, TCM ;
MILINSKI, M .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY, 1991, 29 (03) :205-210
[6]   A taste for the beautiful: Latent aesthetic mate preferences for white crests in two species of Australian grassfinches [J].
Burley, NT ;
Symanski, R .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1998, 152 (06) :792-802
[7]   Females discriminate against heterospecific sperm in a natural hybrid zone [J].
Cramer, Emily R. A. ;
Alund, Murielle ;
McFarlane, S. Eryn ;
Johnsen, Arild ;
Qvarnstrom, Anna .
EVOLUTION, 2016, 70 (08) :1844-1855
[8]   The Risk and Intensity of Sperm Ejection in Female Birds [J].
Dean, Rebecca ;
Nakagawa, Shinichi ;
Pizzari, Tommaso .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2011, 178 (03) :343-354
[9]   Female preference for complex/novel signals in a spider [J].
Elias, Damian O. ;
Hebets, Eileen A. ;
Hoy, Ronald R. .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY, 2006, 17 (05) :765-771
[10]   Postmating Female Control: 20 Years of Cryptic Female Choice [J].
Firman, Renee C. ;
Gasparini, Clelia ;
Manier, Mollie K. ;
Pizzari, Tommaso .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2017, 32 (05) :368-382