Public Service Motivation (PSM) and Support for Citizen Participation: A Test of Perry and Vandenabeele's Reformulation of PSM Theory

被引:82
作者
Coursey, David [1 ]
Pandey, Sanjay K. [3 ]
Yang, Kaifeng [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Arlington, Publ Adm Program, Arlington, TX 76019 USA
[2] Florida State Univ, Askew Sch Publ Adm & Policy, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
[3] Rutgers Univ Newark, Newark, NJ USA
关键词
PERSON-ORGANIZATION; INVOLVEMENT EFFORTS; FIT; JOB; PERFORMANCE; TURNOVER; AGENDA; SECTOR; TRUST; BASES;
D O I
10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02581.x
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
This article examines how public service motivation (PSM) relates to public managers attitudes toward citizen participation. Perry and Vandenabeele suggest that PSM effects are moderated and/or mediated by self-regulation and by the salience of an activity to self-identity. Using data from Phase IV of the National Administrative Studies Project, latent model results suggest a direct, positive relationship between PSM and citizen participation evaluation. The relationship is not mediated by value congruence but rather is moderated by the perceived importance of the organizations citizen participation efforts. The moderating effect has three interpretations: (1) PSM has a stronger relationship to evaluation as citizen participation becomes more important in the agency; (2) at low and medium PSM levels, the greater the importance of citizen participation, the lower its evaluation; or (3) at high PSM levels, the greater the importance of citizen participation, the higher its evaluation. This suggests that PSM is more germane for activities such as citizen participation, invoking relevant values as perceived organizational commitment increases.
引用
收藏
页码:572 / 582
页数:11
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   Public service motivation and job performance - Evidence from the federal sector [J].
Alonso, P ;
Lewis, GB .
AMERICAN REVIEW OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2001, 31 (04) :363-380
[2]  
[Anonymous], CIVIL SERVICE WHAT D
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Handbook of self-determination research
[4]  
BALDWIN JN, 1984, REV PUBLIC PERS ADM, V4, P80
[5]  
Balfour D.L., 1990, REV PUBLIC ADM, V10, P23, DOI DOI 10.1177/0734371X9001000303
[6]  
Bandura A, 1986, Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory, DOI DOI 10.5465/AMR.1987.4306538
[7]  
Barber B., 1984, STRONG DEMOCRACY
[8]  
Brewer GeneA., 2000, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, V10, P685, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024287, DOI 10.1093/OXFORDJOURNALS.JPART.A024287]
[9]  
Bright L., 2007, Review of Public Personnel Administration, V27, P361
[10]   Toward a relevant agenda for a responsive public administration [J].
Bryer, Thomas A. .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2007, 17 (03) :479-500