Correlation between estimates of tumor perfusion from microbubble contrast-enhanced sonography and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging

被引:28
|
作者
Yankeelov, TE
Niermann, KJ
Huamani, J
Kim, DW
Quarles, CC
Fleischer, AC
Hallahan, DE
Price, RR
Gore, JC
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Inst Imaging Sci, Med Ctr N R1302, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
[2] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Radiol, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
[3] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Radiol Sci, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
[4] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
[5] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
关键词
dynamic contrast-enhanced; magnetic resonance imaging; microbubble contrast-enhanced sonography; microbubbles; tumor;
D O I
10.7863/jum.2006.25.4.487
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objective. We compared measurements of tumor perfusion from microbubble contrast-enhanced sonography (MCES) and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) in an animal tumor model. Methods. Seven mice were implanted with Lewis lung carcinoma cells on their hind limbs and imaged 14 days later with a Philips 5- to 7-MHz sonography system (Philips Medical Systems, Andover, MA) and a Varian 7.0-T MRI system (Varian, Inc, Palo Alto, CA). For sonographic imaging 100 mu L of a perfluoropropane microbubble contrast agent (Definity; Bristol-Myers Squibb Medical Imaging, Billerica, MA) was injected and allowed to reach a pseudo steady state, after which a high-mechanical index pulse was delivered to destroy the microbubbles within the field of view, and the replenishment of the microbubbles was imaged for 30 to 60 seconds. The MRI included acquisition of a T, map and 35 serial T-1-weighted images (repetition time, 100 milliseconds; echo time, 3.1 milliseconds; alpha, 30 degrees) after the injection of 100 mu L of 0.2-mmol/kg gadopentetate dimeglumine (Magnevist; Berlex, Wayne, NJ). Region-of-interest and voxel-by-voxel analyses of both data sets were performed; microbubble contrast-enhanced sonography returned estimates of microvessel cross-sectional area, microbubble velocity, and mean blood flow, whereas DCE-MRI returned estimates of a perfusion-permeability index and the extravascular extracellular volume fraction. Results. Comparing similar regions of tumor tissue seen on sonography and MRI, region-of-interest analyses revealed a strong (r(2) = 0.57) and significant relationship (P < .002) between the estimates of perfusion obtained by the two modalities. Conclusions. Microbubble contrast-enhanced sonography can effectively depict intratumoral heterogeneity in preclinical xenograft models when voxel-by-voxel analysis is performed, and this analysis correlates with similar DCE-MRI measurements.
引用
收藏
页码:487 / 497
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of Myocardial Perfusion Estimates From Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Four Quantitative Analysis Methods
    Pack, Nathan A.
    DiBella, Edward V. R.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2010, 64 (01) : 125 - 137
  • [32] Contrast-Enhanced Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Restrepo, Carlos S.
    Tavakoli, Sina
    Marmol-Velez, Alejandro
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2012, 20 (04) : 739 - +
  • [33] Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance lymphangiography
    Ramirez-Suarez, Karen I.
    Tierradentro-Garcia, Luis O.
    Smith, Christopher L.
    Krishnamurthy, Ganesh
    Escobar, Fernando A.
    Otero, Hansel J.
    Rapp, Jordan B.
    Dori, Yoav
    Biko, David M.
    PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2022, 52 (02) : 285 - 294
  • [34] Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: fundamentals and application to the evaluation of the peripheral perfusion
    Gordon, Yaron
    Partovi, Sasan
    Mueller-Eschner, Matthias
    Amarteifio, Erick
    Baeuerle, Tobias
    Weber, Marc-Andre
    Kauczor, Hans-Ulrich
    Rengier, Fabian
    CARDIOVASCULAR DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY, 2014, 4 (02) : 147 - 164
  • [35] Peripheral Nerve Perfusion by Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Demonstration of Feasibility
    Baeumer, Philipp
    Reimann, Maximilian
    Decker, Clemens
    Radbruch, Alexander
    Bendszus, Martin
    Heiland, Sabine
    Pham, Mirko
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2014, 49 (08) : 518 - 523
  • [36] CONTRAST-ENHANCED ULTRASONOGRAPHY VERSUS CONTRAST-ENHANCED MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF MEDIASTINAL TUMORS
    Pan, Juhong
    Chen, Wenwei
    Zhang, Haidong
    Huang, Xingyue
    Huang, Xin
    ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2021, 47 (02): : 261 - 271
  • [37] Advances in Contrast Agents for Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Khairnar, Snehal
    More, Namdev
    Mounika, Choppadandi
    Kapusetti, Govinda
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION SCIENCES, 2019, 50 (04) : 575 - 589
  • [38] COMPARISON BETWEEN PERFUSION COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY AND DYNAMIC CONTRAST-ENHANCED MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING IN RECTAL CANCER
    Kierkels, Roel G. J.
    Backes, Walter H.
    Janssen, Marco H. M.
    Buijsen, Jeroen
    Beets-Tan, Regina G. H.
    Lambin, Philippe
    Lammerng, Guido
    Oellers, Michel C.
    Aerts, Hugo J. W. L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 77 (02): : 400 - 408
  • [39] The temporal correlation of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging with tumor angiogenesis in a murine glioblastoma model
    Veeravagu, Anand
    Hou, Lewis C.
    Hsu, Andrew R.
    Cai, Weibo
    Greve, Joan M.
    Chen, Xiaoyuan
    Tse, Victor
    NEUROLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2008, 30 (09) : 952 - 959
  • [40] Correlation of Quantified Contrast-Enhanced Sonography With In Vivo Tumor Response
    Hwang, Misun
    Hariri, Ghazal
    Lyshchik, Andrej
    Hallahan, Dennis E.
    Fleischer, Arthur C.
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2010, 29 (04) : 597 - 607