Performing Local Network Alignment by Ensembling Global Aligners

被引:0
作者
Manners, Hazel N. [1 ]
Elmsallati, Ahed [2 ]
Guzzi, Pietro H. [3 ]
Roy, Swarup [1 ]
Kalita, Jugal K. [4 ]
机构
[1] North Eastern Hill Univ, Dept Informat Technol, Shillong, Meghalaya, India
[2] McKendree Univ, Div Comp, Lebanon, NH USA
[3] Univ Catanzaro, Dept Surg Med Sci, Catanzaro, Italy
[4] Univ Colorado, Dept Comp Sci, Colorado Springs, CO 80907 USA
来源
2017 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOINFORMATICS AND BIOMEDICINE (BIBM) | 2017年
关键词
PROTEIN-INTERACTION NETWORKS; PAIRWISE ALIGNMENT; PPI NETWORK; IDENTIFICATION; COMPLEXES;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Interactions among proteins are important mechanisms in living cells. The whole set of interactions is often referred to as a protein-protein interaction network (PIN). Comparison among such networks may discover conserved (or disrupted) patterns of interactions among species. Such comparison is performed using network alignment algorithms. They help analyse PPI networks for a better understanding of biological processes such as finding conserved regions between species, giving us insight into their evolution. However, there is no best aligner or standard evaluation measure to assess the quality of alignments. In this work, we use several aligners to produce an ensembled result, which can further improve individual aligners' alignment quality. Two basic ensemble approaches are used: One by finding majority node mappings from aligners and another by combining their results into one final alignment. These alignments are then evaluated based on three scoring schemes: Gene Ontology Consistency (GOC), Node Coverage (NCV) and Generalised Symmetric Substructure Score (GS(3)) using IsoBase PPI networks. Results show that the majority voting based ensemble scheme performs well in GS(3) while the ensemble by the union of the decision by different aligners produces satisfactory outcomes in comparison in GOC and NCV scores.
引用
收藏
页码:1316 / 1323
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   SPINAL: scalable protein interaction network alignment [J].
Aladag, Ahmet E. ;
Erten, Cesim .
BIOINFORMATICS, 2013, 29 (07) :917-924
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2017, BRIEF BIOINFORM
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, NAT BIOTECHNOL
[4]   Protein-to-Protein Interactions: Technologies, Databases, and Algorithms [J].
Cannataro, Mario ;
Guzzi, Pietro H. ;
Veltri, Pierangelo .
ACM COMPUTING SURVEYS, 2010, 43 (01)
[5]   AlignNemo: A Local Network Alignment Method to Integrate Homology and Topology [J].
Ciriello, Giovanni ;
Mina, Marco ;
Guzzi, Pietro H. ;
Cannataro, Mario ;
Guerra, Concettina .
PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (06)
[6]   A multiobjective memetic algorithm for PPI network alignment [J].
Clark, Connor ;
Kalita, Jugal .
BIOINFORMATICS, 2015, 31 (12) :1988-1998
[7]   A comparison of algorithms for the pairwise alignment of biological networks [J].
Clark, Connor ;
Kalita, Jugal .
BIOINFORMATICS, 2014, 30 (16) :2351-2359
[8]   Phylogenetic analysis of modularity in protein interaction networks [J].
Erten, Sinan ;
Li, Xin ;
Bebek, Gurkan ;
Li, Jing ;
Koyuturk, Mehmet .
BMC BIOINFORMATICS, 2009, 10 :333
[9]   Graemlin: General and robust alignment of multiple large interaction networks [J].
Flannick, Jason ;
Novak, Antal ;
Srinivasan, Balaji S. ;
McAdams, Harley H. ;
Batzoglou, Serafim .
GENOME RESEARCH, 2006, 16 (09) :1169-1181
[10]   Automatic Parameter Learning for Multiple Local Network Alignment [J].
Flannick, Jason ;
Novak, Antal ;
Do, Chuong B. ;
Srinivasan, Balaji S. ;
Batzoglou, Serafim .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2009, 16 (08) :1001-1022