Adjusting CA19-9 values with clinical stage and bilirubin to better predict survival of resectable pancreatic cancer patients: 5-year-follow-up of a single center

被引:5
作者
Wu, Zuowei [1 ]
Zhao, Pengcheng [1 ]
Wang, Zihe [1 ]
Huang, Xing [1 ]
Wu, Chao [1 ]
Li, Mao [1 ]
Wang, Li [1 ]
Tian, Bole [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Pancreat Surg, Chengdu, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2022年 / 12卷
关键词
carcinoma; pancreatic ductal; pancreatectomy; prognosis; biomarkers; CA19-9; antigen; bilirubin; ADENOCARCINOMA; RESECTION; FEATURES;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2022.966256
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundPancreatic cancer mortality is growing every year, and radical resection is the most essential therapy strategy. It is critical to evaluate the long-term prognosis of individuals receiving radical surgery. CA19-9 is a biomarker for patient recurrence and survival, however obstructive jaundice has a significant impact on this index. Researchers have attempted to modify the index using various modification methods, but the results have been unsatisfactory. In this study, we adjusted CA19-9 values based on clinical stage and bilirubin and found that it provided better prediction than CA19-9 alone in assessing patients. MethodsWe analyzed over 5 years follow-up records of patients who underwent radical pancreatic cancer surgery between August 2009 and May 2017 in a single center. We investigated the association of risk factors with overall survival (OS) as well as disease-free survival (DFS) after surgery. Threshold values for high-risk features associated with poor prognosis in resectable pancreatic cancer were determined. The hazard ratios of the indicators were eventually examined under the stratification of patients' clinical stages. ResultsA total of 202 patients were involved in the study. The optimum cut-off values for CA19-9 and CA19-9/TB for predicting overall survival were 219.4 (p = 0.0075) and 18.8 (p = 0.0353), respectively. CA19-9>219.4 increased the risk of patient mortality by 1.70 times (95% CI 1.217-2.377, p = 0.002), and tumor poor differentiation raised the risk by 1.66 times (95% CI 1.083-2.553, P = 0.02). Based on clinical stage stratification, we found discrepancies in the predictive efficacy of CA19-9 and CA19-9/TB. CA19-9 was a better predictor in clinical stage 1 (HR = 2.056[CI 95%1.169-3.616], P = 0.012), whereas CA19-9/TB indications were better in stages 2 (HR = 1.650[CI 95%1.023-2.662], P = 0.040) and 3 (HR = 3.989[CI95%1.145-13.896], P = 0.030). ConclusionsCA19-9, CEA, and tumor differentiation are predictors for patients with resectable PDAC. CA19-9 values can be adjusted based on clinical stage and bilirubin levels to better predict overall survival in patients with resectable PDAC. CA19-9>219.4 predicted poor survival in individuals in clinical stage 1, whereas CA19-9/TB>18.8 predicted poor survival for individuals in stages 2 and 3.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   The Diagnostic Value of the CA19-9 and Bilirubin Ratio in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer, Distal Bile Duct Cancer and Benign Periampullary Diseases, a Novel Approach [J].
Boyd, Lenka N. C. ;
Ali, Mahsoem ;
Kam, Laura ;
Puik, Jisce R. ;
Rodrigues, Stephanie M. Fraga ;
Zwart, Eline S. ;
Daams, Freek ;
Zonderhuis, Barbara M. ;
Meijer, Laura L. ;
Le Large, Tessa Y. S. ;
Giovannetti, Elisa ;
van Laarhoven, Hanneke W. M. ;
Kazemier, Geert .
CANCERS, 2022, 14 (02)
[2]   X-tile: A new bio-informatics tool for biomarker assessment and outcome-based cut-point optimization [J].
Camp, RL ;
Dolled-Filhart, M ;
Rimm, DL .
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2004, 10 (21) :7252-7259
[3]   The STROBE guidelines [J].
Cuschieri, Sarah .
SAUDI JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2019, 13 :31-34
[4]   Contemporary Reappraisal of Intraoperative Neck Margin Assessment During Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma A Review [J].
Datta, Jashodeep ;
Willobee, Brent A. ;
Ryon, Emily L. ;
Shah, Mihir M. ;
Drebin, Jeffrey A. ;
Kooby, David A. ;
Merchant, Nipun B. .
JAMA SURGERY, 2021, 156 (05) :489-495
[5]   Preoperative CEA and CA 19-9 are prognostic markers for survival after curative resection for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas - A retrospective tumor marker prognostic study [J].
Distler, Marius ;
Pilarsky, Eva ;
Kersting, Stephan ;
Gruetzmann, Robert .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 11 (10) :1067-1072
[6]   Worldwide Burden of, Risk Factors for, and Trends in Pancreatic Cancer [J].
Huang, Junjie ;
Lok, Veeleah ;
Ngai, Chun Ho ;
Zhang, Lin ;
Yuan, Jinqiu ;
Lao, Xiang Qian ;
Ng, Kelvin ;
Chong, Charing ;
Zheng, Zhi-Jie ;
Wong, Martin C. S. .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 160 (03) :744-754
[7]   Potential Biomarkers in Lewis Negative Patients With Pancreatic Cancer [J].
Luo, Guopei ;
Liu, Chen ;
Guo, Meng ;
Cheng, He ;
Lu, Yu ;
Jin, Kaizhou ;
Liu, Liang ;
Long, Jiang ;
Xu, Jin ;
Lu, Renquan ;
Ni, Quanxing ;
Yu, Xianjun .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2017, 265 (04) :800-805
[8]   CA19-9-Low&Lewis (+) pancreatic cancer: A unique subtype [J].
Luo, Guopei ;
Liu, Chen ;
Guo, Meng ;
Long, Jiang ;
Liu, Zuqiang ;
Xiao, Zhiwen ;
Jin, Kaizhou ;
Cheng, He ;
Lu, Yu ;
Ni, Quanxing ;
Yu, Xianjun .
CANCER LETTERS, 2017, 385 :46-50
[9]   Lymph node evaluation for treatment of adenocarcinoma of the pancreas [J].
Marmor, Schelomo ;
Burke, Erin E. ;
Portschy, Pamela R. ;
Virnig, Beth A. ;
Jensen, Eric H. ;
Tuttle, Todd M. .
SURGICAL ONCOLOGY-OXFORD, 2015, 24 (03) :284-291
[10]   Defining and Treating Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer [J].
Perri, Giampaolo ;
Prakash, Laura ;
Katz, Matthew H. G. .
CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN ONCOLOGY, 2020, 21 (09)