Life cycle assessment of two alternative bioenergy systems involving Salix spp. biomass: Bioethanol production and power generation

被引:89
作者
Gonzalez-Garcia, Sara [1 ,2 ]
Iribarren, Diego [3 ]
Susmozas, Ana [3 ]
Dufour, Javier [3 ,4 ]
Murphy, Richard J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Santiago de Compostela, Dept Chem Engn, Sch Engn, Santiago De Compostela 15782, Spain
[2] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Div Biol, Dept Life Sci, London SW7 2AZ, England
[3] IMDEA Energia Inst, Energy Syst Anal Unit, Mostoles 28935, Spain
[4] Rey Juan Carlos Univ, Dept Chem & Energy Technol, Mostoles 28933, Spain
关键词
Bioenergy; Bioethanol; Biomass integrated gasification combined cycle (BIGCC); Electricity; Life Cycle Assessment (LCA); Willow; ENERGY CROPS; FUEL ETHANOL; CO2; EMISSION; NATURAL-GAS; POPLAR; GASIFICATION; BIODIESEL; WILLOW; ELECTRICITY; CONVERSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.02.022
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Two energy production systems using short rotation coppice (SRC) willow chips were evaluated: bioethanol production via enzyme-catalyzed hydrolysis and electricity production following a biomass integrated gasification combined cycle scheme. The most relevant input and output flows of each renewable energy system were identified and quantified throughout the life cycle from the SRC willow plantation to the bioenergy plant gate. Both bioenergy systems were found to be feasible from an energy perspective. Moreover, they entailed environmental benefits when compared to conventional energy practices. However, improvements relating to not only willow biomass production but also bioenergy conversion-related activities should be considered. In this respect, the process steps that provided the highest environmental impacts have been highlighted. Furthermore, well-to-wheels environmental characterization results were estimated and compared for the bioethanol and bioelectricity scenarios. In this sense, the identification of the most appropriate processing route for willow chips was found to be highly dependent on the impact category under assessment. In particular, global warming and energy parameters led to opposite conclusions. While the bioethanol scenario arose as the potentially best choice from an energy perspective, the bioelectricity scenario seems to be a more suitable alternative when global warming is the decisive factor. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 122
页数:12
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   Life cycle assessment of Jatropha biodiesel as transportation fuel in rural India [J].
Achten, Wouter M. J. ;
Almeida, Joana ;
Fobelets, Vincent ;
Bolle, Evelien ;
Mathijs, Erik ;
Singh, Virendra P. ;
Tewari, Dina N. ;
Verchot, Louis V. ;
Muys, Bart .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2010, 87 (12) :3652-3660
[2]  
Althaus HJ, 2007, Ecoinvent report No. 8, v2.0 EMPA
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2002, NRELTP51032438 US DE
[5]  
[Anonymous], Aspen Plus
[6]  
[Anonymous], 3 SWISS CTR LIF CYCL
[7]   Life cycle assessment of switchgrass-derived ethanol as transport fuel [J].
Bai, Yu ;
Luo, Lin ;
van der Voet, Ester .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2010, 15 (05) :468-477
[8]  
Barta Zsolt, 2010, Enzyme Res, V2010, P734182, DOI 10.4061/2010/734182
[9]   Energy from gasification of solid wastes [J].
Belgiorno, V ;
De Feo, G ;
Della Rocca, C ;
Napoli, RMA .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2003, 23 (01) :1-15
[10]   Agricultural crop-based biofuels - resource efficiency and environmental performance including direct land use changes [J].
Borjesson, Pal ;
Tufvesson, Linda M. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2011, 19 (2-3) :108-120