Who speaks for the future of Earth? How critical social science can extend the conversation on the Anthropocene

被引:271
作者
Loevbrand, Eva [1 ]
Beck, Silke [2 ]
Chilvers, Jason [3 ]
Forsyth, Tim [4 ]
Hedren, Johan [1 ]
Hulme, Mike [5 ]
Lidskog, Rolf [6 ]
Vasileiadou, Eleftheria [7 ]
机构
[1] Linkoping Univ, Dept Themat Studies Environm Change, S-58183 Linkoping, Sweden
[2] UFZ, Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Dept Environm Polit, D-04318 Leipzig, Germany
[3] Univ E Anglia, Sch Environm Sci, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
[4] Univ London London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, Dept Int Dev, London WC2A 2AE, England
[5] Kings Coll London, Dept Geog, London WC2R 2LS, England
[6] Univ Orebro, Social Environm Sect, S-70182 Orebro, Sweden
[7] Tech Univ Eindhoven, Dept Ind Engn & Innovat Sci, NL-5600 MB Eindhoven, Netherlands
来源
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS | 2015年 / 32卷
关键词
Anthropocence; Politics; Global environmental change; Social science; Critical interpretation; Ontology; GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL-CHANGE; CLIMATE-CHANGE; SYSTEM; HUMANITIES; POLITICS; IPCC; SAFE;
D O I
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.03.012
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper asks how the social sciences can engage with the idea of the Anthropocene in productive ways. In response to this question we outline an interpretative research agenda that allows critical engagement with the Anthropocene as a socially and culturally bounded object with many possible meanings and political trajectories. In order to facilitate the kind of political mobilization required to meet the complex environmental challenges of our times, we argue that the social sciences should refrain from adjusting to standardized research agendas and templates. A more urgent analytical challenge lies in exposing, challenging and extending the ontological assumptions that inform how we make sense of and respond to a rapidly changing environment. By cultivating environmental research that opens up multiple interpretations of the Anthropocene, the social sciences can help to extend the realm of the possible for environmental politics. (c) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 218
页数:8
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]  
Agarwal A., 1991, GLOBAL WARMING UNEQU
[2]  
Alaimo Stacy., 2010, Bodily Natures: Science, Environment, and the Material Self
[3]  
Baldwin Andrew., 2003, SPACE CULT, V6, P415, DOI DOI 10.1177/1206331203253189
[4]   Climate change ethics, rights, and policies: an introduction [J].
Barry, John ;
Mol, Arthur P. J. ;
Zito, Anthony R. .
ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2013, 22 (03) :361-376
[5]  
Baskin J., 2014, 3 MSSI U MELB
[6]   Towards a Reflexive Turn in the Governance of Global Environmental Expertise The Cases of the IPCC and the IPBES [J].
Beck, Silke ;
Borie, Maud ;
Chilvers, Jason ;
Esguerra, Alejandro ;
Heubach, Katja ;
Hulme, Mike ;
Lidskog, Rolf ;
Loevbrand, Eva ;
Marquard, Elisabeth ;
Miller, Clark ;
Nadim, Tahani ;
Nesshoever, Carsten ;
Settele, Josef ;
Turnhout, Esther ;
Vasileiadou, Eleftheria ;
Goerg, Christoph .
GAIA-ECOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES FOR SCIENCE AND SOCIETY, 2014, 23 (02) :80-87
[7]   Planetary boundaries and earth system governance: Exploring the links [J].
Biermann, Frank .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2012, 81 :4-9
[8]  
Bradley K, 2014, ROUT ST ENV CULT SOC, P1, DOI 10.4324/9780203067215
[9]  
Brito L., 2012, State of the planet declaration - from the conference Planet under pressure in London 2012
[10]  
Castree N., 2014, Making sense of nature