Finding the ecological farmer: A farmer typology to understand ecological practice adoption within Europe

被引:19
作者
Barnes, Andrew P. [1 ]
Thompson, Bethan [1 ]
Toma, Luiza [1 ]
机构
[1] SRUC, Dept Rural Econ Environm & Soc, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, Scotland
来源
CURRENT RESEARCH IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY | 2022年 / 4卷
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会; 欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Ecological practices; Farmer identity; Latent class analysis; European farming; SOCIAL DISTANCE; ENVIRONMENTAL PERSPECTIVES; CONSERVATION PRACTICES; AGROFORESTRY ADOPTION; MANAGEMENT PRACTICES; BIRD CONSERVATION; FARMING PRACTICES; SUPPLY CHAINS; DUTCH FARMERS; LIFE-CYCLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.crsust.2022.100125
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Agricultural policies are now orientated towards sustainable food production which integrate climate and biodiversity targets. Increasing the uptake of ecological approaches is intrinsic to the success of these policies. but this is contingent on farmer acceptability of these practices. We employ a cross-European farmer survey to explore the perspectives of producers and to derive a typology based on their ecological self-identities.Using a one stage latent class model we find four types and examine common factors which may correlate to farmer membership of a particular group. We find two types which are positive towards uptake of ecological approaches but are mainly differentiated by their responses to social pressure and the acceptance of ecological practices within their supply chains. A further group reveals a multifunctional identity, which balances ecological with food productivity goals, whereas a final group show indifference towards ecological approaches and may align with previous work identifying productivist farming identities. As Governments are seeking to promote transition within the industry we argue for clear policy intent inmessaging, as well as approaches which support supply chain dialogue to target particular groups of farmers for real behavioural change.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 124 条
[1]  
Almirall E, 2012, TECHNOL INNOV MANAG, P12
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2020, EU Biodiversity Strategy
[3]   Climate change typologies and audience segmentation among Corn Belt farmers [J].
Arbuckle, J. G. ;
Tyndall, J. C. ;
Morton, L. W. ;
Hobbs, J. .
JOURNAL OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION, 2017, 72 (03) :205-214
[4]   Kicking the Habit: What Makes and Breaks Farmers' Intentions to Reduce Pesticide Use? [J].
Bakker, L. ;
Sok, J. ;
van der Werf, W. ;
Bianchi, F. J. J. A. .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2021, 180
[5]   Use of conservation practices by women farmers in the Northeastern United States [J].
Barbercheck, Mary ;
Brasier, Kathryn ;
Kiernan, Nancy Ellen ;
Sachs, Carolyn ;
Trauger, Amy .
RENEWABLE AGRICULTURE AND FOOD SYSTEMS, 2014, 29 (01) :65-82
[6]   Comparing a 'budge' to a 'nudge': Farmer responses to voluntary and compulsory compliance in a water quality management regime [J].
Barnes, A. P. ;
Toma, L. ;
Willock, J. ;
Hall, C. .
JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES, 2013, 32 :448-459
[7]   Heterogeneity in climate change risk perception amongst dairy farmers: A latent class clustering analysis [J].
Barnes, A. P. ;
Islam, Md M. ;
Toma, L. .
APPLIED GEOGRAPHY, 2013, 41 :105-115
[8]   Utilising a farmer typology to understand farmer behaviour towards water quality management: Nitrate Vulnerable Zones in Scotland [J].
Barnes, A. P. ;
Willock, J. ;
Toma, L. ;
Hall, C. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2011, 54 (04) :477-494
[9]   Farmer perspectives and practices regarding water pollution control programmes in Scotland [J].
Barnes, A. P. ;
Willock, J. ;
Hall, C. ;
Toma, L. .
AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2009, 96 (12) :1715-1722
[10]   Disadvantage and economic viability: characterising vulnerabilities and resilience in upland farming systems [J].
Barnes, Andrew P. ;
Thomson, Steven G. ;
Ferreira, Joana .
LAND USE POLICY, 2020, 96