Comparison of Direct and Indirect Methods for Five-axis Machine Tools Geometric Error Measurement

被引:15
作者
Xing, Kanglin [1 ]
Achiche, Sofiane [1 ]
Esmaeili, Sareh [1 ]
Mayer, J. R. R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ecole Polytech Montreal, Dept Mech Engn, Stn Downtown, POB 6079, Montreal, PQ H3C 3A7, Canada
来源
6TH CIRP GLOBAL WEB CONFERENCE - ENVISAGING THE FUTURE MANUFACTURING, DESIGN, TECHNOLOGIES AND SYSTEMS IN INNOVATION ERA (CIRPE 2018) | 2018年 / 78卷
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Five-axis machine tool; geometric error; SAMBA method; COMPENSATION; CALIBRATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.procir.2018.08.310
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Geometrical error (GE) is a key criterion for machine tools performance evaluation. GE measurement methods can be classified as direct and indirect methods. As an indirect GE measurement method, the scale and master ball artefact (SAMBA) method can estimate the GE of linear and rotary axes by probing series of master balls and a scale bar artefact installed on the machine tool pallet. The purpose of this study is to research the performance of direct and indirect GE measurement methods (i.e. laser interferometer and SAMBA method) in linear positioning error measurement such as EXX and EYY. These errors of the X- and Y-axis are separately measured on a five-axis machine tool with the two methods. The results reveal that the SAMBA method yields similar results as the laser test in error shape and range. However, there are some minor differences which are discussed. (C) 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
引用
收藏
页码:231 / 236
页数:6
相关论文
共 17 条