Modular junction may be more problematic than bearing wear in metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty

被引:14
作者
Vendittoli, Pascal-Andre [1 ]
Masse, Vincent [1 ]
Kiss, Marc-Olivier [1 ]
Lusignan, Daniel [1 ]
Lavigne, Martin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montreal, Dept Surg, Hosp Maisonneuve Rosemont, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
Adverse reaction to metal debris; metal ions; metal-on-metal joint prostheses; modular stem; taper junction; total hip arthroplasty; CHROMIUM SERUM-LEVELS; ION LEVELS; NECKS ANALYSIS; CERAMIC THR; LARGE-HEAD; CORROSION; COBALT; REPLACEMENT; INTERFACE; RELEASE;
D O I
10.1177/1120700018808696
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: In total hip arthroplasty (THA), local adverse reaction to metal debris (ARMD) may be caused by abnormal metal ion release from a metal-on-metal (MoM) bearing, or by wear and corrosion of the implant's modular junction. The aim of this study was to compare ion levels and rate of ARMD between patients sharing the same MoM bearing but 1 group having monoblock stems versus another having modular stems. Materials and methods: Whole blood cobalt (Co) and chromium (Cr) ion concentrations, ARMD rate, revision rate, and function measured by UCLA and WOMAC scores were compared between groups. Results: ARMD rate was significantly higher in the modular group (46%) compared with the monoblock group (16%, p = 0.031). Revision for ARMD was performed at 52.8 +/- 8.1 months in the modular group versus 98.2 +/- 15.5 months after primary THA in the monoblock group. ARMD originated from wear and corrosion of the junction between stem and femoral head adapter sleeve in all monoblock cases, and the junction between stem and modular neck in all the modular ones. Cr and Co ions levels were significantly higher in the modular stem group (p < 0.001 for both). Conclusions: Although both groups had MoM bearings, corrosion at stem/neck or neck/head junctions combining dissimilar metal (Ti and Cr-Co) was seen as the source of excess metal ions release leading to ARMD. Poor performance of the modular junction may be more deleterious than wear of the bearing. To avoid such complications, THA femoral stem modular junctions should be eliminated (return to a full monoblock implant) or have improved junction design.
引用
收藏
页码:262 / 269
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Higher Prevalence of Mixed or Solid Pseudotumors in Metal-on-Polyethylene Total Hip Arthroplasty Compared With Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty and Resurfacing Hip Arthroplasty
    Hjorth, Mette Holm
    Mechlenburg, Inger
    Soballe, Kjeld
    Roemer, Lone
    Jakobsen, Stig Storgaard
    Stilling, Maiken
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2018, 33 (07) : 2279 - 2286
  • [42] Do cobalt and chromium levels predict osteolysis in metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty?
    Renner, Lisa
    Schmidt-Braekling, Tom
    Faschingbauer, Martin
    Boettner, Friedrich
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2016, 136 (12) : 1657 - 1662
  • [43] Metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: risk factors for pseudotumours and clinical systematic evaluation
    Liow, Ming Han Lincoln
    Kwon, Young-Min
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2017, 41 (05) : 885 - 892
  • [44] Cushion bearings versus large diameter head metal-on-metal bearings in total hip arthroplasty: a short-term metal ion study
    Moroni, Antonio
    Nocco, Emanuele
    Hoque, Martha
    Diremigio, Elena
    Buffoli, Dario
    Cantu, Francesco
    Catalani, Simona
    Apostoli, Pietro
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2012, 132 (01) : 123 - 129
  • [45] A prospective randomized clinical trial comparing metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal total hip resurfacing in patients less than 65 years old
    Vendittoli, PA
    Lavigne, M
    Roy, AG
    Lusignan, D
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2006, 16 (02) : S73 - S81
  • [46] Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty for Aseptically Failed Metal-On-Metal Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty
    Salmons, Harold I.
    Fruth, Kristin M.
    Lewallen, David G.
    Trousdale, Robert T.
    Berry, Daniel J.
    Abdel, Matthew P.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2022, 37 (12) : 2399 - 2405
  • [47] Outcome of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty in Management of Failed Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasty
    Rahman, Wael A.
    Amenabar, Tomas
    Hetaimish, Bandar M.
    Safir, Oleg A.
    Kuzyk, Paul R.
    Gross, Allan E.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2016, 31 (11) : 2559 - 2563
  • [48] The Effect of Bottom Profile Dimples on the Femoral Head on Wear in Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Jamari, J.
    Ammarullah, Muhammad Imam
    Saad, Amir Putra Md
    Syahrom, Ardiyansyah
    Uddin, Mohammad
    van der Heide, Emile
    Basri, Hasan
    JOURNAL OF FUNCTIONAL BIOMATERIALS, 2021, 12 (02)
  • [49] Ultrasound findings in asymptomatic patients with modular metal on metal total hip arthroplasty
    Frisch, Nicholas B.
    Wessell, Nolan M.
    Taliaferro, Kevin
    Van Holsbeeck, Marnix
    Silverton, Craig D.
    SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2017, 46 (05) : 641 - 649
  • [50] The John Charnley Award Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing versus Large-diameter Head Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Garbuz, Donald S.
    Tanzer, Michael
    Greidanus, Nelson V.
    Masri, Bassam A.
    Duncan, Clive P.
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2010, 468 (02) : 318 - 325