Rebaseline no evidence of disease activity (NEDA-3) as a predictor of long-term disease course in a Norwegian multiple sclerosis population

被引:6
作者
Simonsen, Cecilia Smith [1 ]
Flemmen, Heidi Oyen [2 ,3 ]
Broch, Line [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Brekke, Kamilla [1 ,5 ]
Brunborg, Cathrine [6 ]
Berg-Hansen, Pal [4 ]
Celius, Elisabeth Gulowsen [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Vestre Viken Hosp Trust, Dept Neurol, Drammen, Norway
[2] Hosp Telemark HF, Dept Neurol, Skien, Norway
[3] Univ Oslo, Inst Clin Med, Oslo, Norway
[4] Oslo Univ Hosp, Dept Neurol, Oslo, Norway
[5] Hosp Vestfold, Dept Neurol, Tonsberg, Norway
[6] Oslo Univ Hosp, Oslo Ctr Biostat & Epidemiol, Res Support Serv, Oslo, Norway
来源
FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY | 2022年 / 13卷
关键词
multiple sclerosis; NEDA; 3; no evidence of disease activity; time to EDSS 6; high efficacy treatment; INTERFERON-BETA; DISABILITY; EVOLUTION; EFFICACY; THERAPY; TIME;
D O I
10.3389/fneur.2022.1034056
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
IntroductionNo evidence of disease activity with three components (NEDA-3) is achieved if the person with MS (pwMS) has no new MRI lesions, no new relapses and no change in Expanded disability status scale (EDSS) over 1 year. Whether NEDA-3 is a good tool in measuring disease activity is up for discussion, but it is superior to the individual parameters separately and user-friendly. There is disagreement on whether NEDA-3 is a good predictor of long-term disability. MethodsThis is a retrospective cohort study using real-world data with limited selection bias from the complete MS population at two hospitals in the southeast of Norway. We included pwMS diagnosed between 2006 and 2017 who had enough information to determine time to failure of NEDA-3 after diagnosis. ResultsOf 536 pwMS, only 38% achieved NEDA 1 year after diagnosis. PwMS achieving NEDA were more likely to be started on a high efficacy drug as the initial drug, but there were no demographic differences. Mean time to NEDA failure was 3.3 (95% CI 2.9-3.7) years. Starting a high efficiacy therapy was associated with an increased risk of sustaining NEDA as compared to those receiving moderate efficacy therapy. PwMS who achieved NEDA at year one had a mean time to EDSS 6 of 33.8 (95% CI 30.9-36.8) years vs. 30.8 (95% CI 25.0-36.6) years in pwMS who did not achieve NEDA, p < 0.001. When rebaselining NEDA 1 year after diagnosis, 52.2% achieved NEDA in the 1st year after rebaseline, mean time to NEDA failure was 3.4 (95% CI 3.0-3.7) years and mean time to EDSS 6 was 44.5 (95% CI 40.4-48.5) years in pwMS achieving NEDA vs. 29.6 (95% CI 24.2-35.0) years in pwMS not achieving NEDA, p < 0.001. After rebaseline, pwMS with a high efficacy therapy as the initial drug had a mean time from diagnosis to NEDA fail of 4.8 years (95% CI 3.9-5.8) vs. 3.1 years (95% CI 2.7-3.5) in pwMS started on a moderate efficacy therapy, p < 0.001. In pwMS with NEDA failure at year one, 70% failed one, 28% failed two and 2% failed three components. New MRI lesions were the most common cause of NEDA failure (63%), followed by new relapses (50%) and EDSS change (25%). ConclusionNEDA-3 from rebaseline after 1 year, once treatment is stabilized, can predict the long-term disease course in MS. Starting a high efficacy DMT is associated with longer time to NEDA failure than moderate therapies. Finally, most pwMS only fail one component and new MRI lesions are the most likely cause of NEDA failure.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Reliability of Classifying Multiple Sclerosis Disease Activity Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging in a Multiple Sclerosis Clinic
    Altay, Ebru Erbayat
    Fisher, Elizabeth
    Jones, Stephen E.
    Hara-Cleaver, Claire
    Lee, Jar-Chi
    Rudick, Richard A.
    [J]. JAMA NEUROLOGY, 2013, 70 (03) : 338 - 344
  • [2] Initial high-efficacy disease-modifying therapy in multiple sclerosis A nationwide cohort study
    Buron, Mathias Due
    Chalmer, Thor Ameri
    Sellebjerg, Finn
    Barzinji, Ismael
    Christensen, Jeppe Romme
    Christensen, Mette Kirstine
    Hansen, Victoria
    Illes, Zsolt
    Jensen, Henrik Boye
    Kant, Matthias
    Papp, Viktoria
    Petersen, Thor
    Rasmussen, Peter Vestergaard
    Schafer, Jakob
    Theodorsdottir, Asta
    Weglewski, Arkadiusz
    Sorensen, Per Soelberg
    Magyari, Melinda
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 2020, 95 (08) : E1041 - E1051
  • [3] Should we still only rely on EDSS to evaluate disability in multiple sclerosis patients? A study of inter and intra rater reliability
    Cohen, Mikael
    Bresch, Saskia
    Rocchi, Oceane Thommel
    Morain, Emmanuel
    Benoit, Jeanne
    Levraut, Michael
    Fakir, Salim
    Landes, Cassandre
    Lebrun-Frenay, Christine
    [J]. MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS AND RELATED DISORDERS, 2021, 54
  • [4] Evolving concepts in the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis
    Comi, Giancarlo
    Radaelli, Marta
    Sorensen, Per Soelberg
    [J]. LANCET, 2017, 389 (10076) : 1347 - 1356
  • [5] Long-Term Evolution of Multiple Sclerosis Disability in the Treatment Era
    Cree, Bruce A. C.
    Gourraud, Pierre-Antoine
    Oksenberg, Jorge R.
    Bevan, Carolyn
    Crabtree-Hartman, Elizabeth
    Gelfand, Jeffrey M.
    Goodin, Douglas S.
    Graves, Jennifer
    Green, Ari J.
    Mowry, Ellen
    Okuda, Darin T.
    Pelletier, Daniel
    von Buedingen, H-Christian
    Zamvil, Scott S.
    Agrawal, Alisha
    Caillier, Stacy
    Ciocca, Caroline
    Gomez, Refujia
    Kanner, Rachel
    Lincoln, Robin
    Lizee, Antoine
    Qualley, Pamela
    Santaniello, Adam
    Suleiman, Leena
    Bucci, Monica
    Panara, Valentina
    Papinutto, Nico
    Stern, William A.
    Zhu, Alyssa H.
    Cutter, Gary R.
    Baranzini, Sergio
    Henry, Roland G.
    Hauser, Stephen L.
    [J]. ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 2016, 80 (04) : 499 - 510
  • [6] MAGNIMS recommendations for harmonization of MRI data in MS multicenter studies
    De Stefano, Nicola
    Battaglini, Marco
    Pareto, Deborah
    Cortese, Rosa
    Zhang, Jian
    Oesingmann, Niels
    Prados, Ferran
    Rocca, Maria A.
    Valsasina, Paola
    Vrenken, Hugo
    Wheeler-Kingshott, Claudia A. M. Gandini
    Filippi, Massimo
    Barkhof, Frederik
    Rovira, Alex
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE-CLINICAL, 2022, 34
  • [7] Maternal education has significant influence on progression in multiple sclerosis
    Flemmen, Heidi Oyen
    Simonsen, Cecilia Smith
    Broch, Line
    Brunborg, Cathrine
    Berg-Hansen, Pal
    Moen, Stine Marit
    Kersten, Hege
    Celius, Elisabeth Gulowsen
    [J]. MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS AND RELATED DISORDERS, 2021, 53
  • [8] Unraveling treatment response in multiple sclerosis A clinical and MRI challenge
    Gasperini, Claudio
    Prosperini, Luca
    Tintore, Mar
    Sormani, Maria Pia
    Filippi, Massimo
    Rio, Jordi
    Palace, Jacqueline
    Rocca, Maria A.
    Ciccarelli, Olga
    Barkhof, Frederik
    Sastre-Garriga, Jaume
    Vrenken, Hugo
    Frederiksen, Jette L.
    Yousry, Tarek A.
    Enzinger, Christian
    Rovira, Alex
    Kappos, Ludwig
    Pozzilli, Carlo
    Montalban, Xavier
    De Stefano, Nicola
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 2019, 92 (04) : 180 - 192
  • [9] "No evident disease activity": The use of combined assessments in the management of patients with multiple sclerosis
    Giovannoni, Gavin
    Tomic, Davorka
    Bright, Jeremy R.
    Havrdova, Eva
    [J]. MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2017, 23 (09) : 1179 - 1187
  • [10] Brain health: time matters in multiple sclerosis
    Giovannoni, Gavin
    Butzkueven, Helmut
    Dhib-Jalbut, Suhayl
    Hobart, Jeremy
    Kobelt, Gisela
    Pepper, George
    Sormani, Maria Pia
    Thalheim, Christoph
    Traboulsee, Anthony
    Vollmer, Timothy
    [J]. MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS AND RELATED DISORDERS, 2016, 9 : S5 - S48