ASSESSMENT OF INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE BY APPLANATION AND REBOUND TONOMETRY IN GUINEA PIGS OF DIFFERENT AGES

被引:2
|
作者
Cairo, Marti
Teresa Pena, Maria
Rios, Jose
Melero, Adria
Martorell, Jaume
Leiva, Marta
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Fdn Hosp Clin Vet, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Fac Vet, Dept Med & Cirurgia Anim, Barcelona, Spain
[3] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Fac Med, Lab Biostat & Epidemiol, Biostat, Bellaterra 08193, Spain
[4] Hosp Clin Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Biostat & Data Management Platform, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
intraocular pressure; eye; laboratory animal; guinea pig; Cavia porcellus; OPHTHALMIC DIAGNOSTIC-TESTS; CIRCADIAN-RHYTHM; REFERENCE VALUES; CAVIA-PORCELLUS; CORNEAL SENSITIVITY; TEAR PRODUCTION; OCULAR GROWTH; DOGS; HORSES; EYE;
D O I
10.1053/j.jepm.2017.10.004
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Fifty-two guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus) with normal ophthalmic examinations were included in this study to determine whether there are differences in the intraocular pressure (IOP) according to age, while assessing the clinical usefulness of 2 different tonometry methods for this species. The animals were divided into 2 groups according to age: young (4 weeks old, 29 animals) and adult (3 to 36 months, 23 animals). Tonometry was performed oculus utro (OU) in the central cornea according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Only measurements with low standard deviation (SD < 5%) were included. Rebound tonometry was performed first OU; following topical anesthesia, applanation tonometry was then performed OU. The time required to obtain an IOP value was recorded for each eye. Descriptive statistics were calculated and Lin Concordance Coefficient (LCC) was performed to describe concordance between methods. Mean TonoVet IOP readings were 8.53 +/- 1.28 mmHg and 13.20 +/- 1.28 mmHg for young and adult animals, respectively (p < 0.05). Tono-Pen VET readings could not be obtained in young animals, but yielded a mean of 10.93 3.61 mmHg in adults. No differences were found between the left and right eyes (p > 0.05) nor between sexes (p > 0.05). TonoVet readings were obtained faster than Tono-Pen VET readings (less than 1 min vs 3.38 +/- 1.27 min, respectively [p < 0.05]). Lin Concordance Coefficient between methods was 0.37 (95% CI: 0.19 to 0.53), documenting a poor concordance between the 2 methods. This study found that normal IOP values are lower in young animals compared with adult animals. Moreover, the results obtained from this investigation demonstrated that TonoVet tonometry is a rapid and well-tolerated procedure when performed on guinea pigs of any age, whereas Tono-Pen VET tonometry is a more time-consuming technique that can only be used on guinea pigs older than 3 months. Copyright 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 31
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A comparison of intraocular pressure measurements with the XPERT noncontact tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry
    Popovich, KS
    Shields, MB
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 1997, 6 (01) : 44 - 46
  • [42] Measurement of the intraocular pressure using an integrated system for air-applanation tonometry
    Weber, Thomas
    Werthschuetzky, Roland
    TM-TECHNISCHES MESSEN, 2007, 74 (04) : 243 - 249
  • [43] Effects of Intravenous Detomidine on Intraocular Pressure Readings Obtained by Applanation Tonometry in Clinically Normal Horses
    Trbolova, Alexandra
    Ghaffari, Masoud Selk
    JOURNAL OF EQUINE VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2013, 33 (03) : 182 - 185
  • [44] Effect of auriculopalpebral nerve block on equine intraocular pressure measured by rebound tonometry (TonoVet®)
    Diehl, Kathryn
    Bowden, Anna Catherine
    VETERINARY OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 23 (02) : 368 - 373
  • [45] Effect of manual eyelid manipulation on intraocular pressure measurement by rebound tonometry
    Baek, Sung Uk
    Ha, Ahnul
    Kim, Young Kook
    Jeoung, Jin Wook
    Park, Ki Ho
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2018, 102 (11) : 1515 - 1519
  • [46] Rebound tonometry versus Goldmann tonometry in school children: feasibility and agreement of intraocular pressure measurements
    Barranco Esporcatte, Bruno Leonardo
    Santos Lopes, Flÿvio Siqueira
    Netto, Camila Fonseca
    Reboucas-Santos, Vespasiano
    Dias, Diego Torres
    Marujo, Fabio Iglesias
    Rolim-de-Moura, Christiane
    ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE OFTALMOLOGIA, 2015, 78 (06) : 359 - 362
  • [47] Goldmann applanation tonometry compared with corneal-compensated intraocular pressure in the evaluation of primary open-angle Glaucoma
    Ehrlich, Joshua R.
    Radcliffe, Nathan M.
    Shimmyo, Mitsugu
    BMC OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2012, 12
  • [48] Goldmann applanation tonometry error relative to true intracameral intraocular pressure in vitro and in vivo
    Sean McCafferty
    Jason Levine
    Jim Schwiegerling
    Eniko T. Enikov
    BMC Ophthalmology, 17
  • [49] Comparison of the corrected intraocular pressure by tonopachy with that of Goldmann applanation tonometry in normal and glaucomatous patients
    Velis, Girish
    Kavitha, Srinivasan
    Zebardast, Nazlee
    Sengupta, Sabyasachi
    Venkatesh, Rengaraj
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 68 (04) : 620 - 626
  • [50] The Clinical Interpretation of Changes in Intraocular Pressure Measurements Using Goldmann Applanation Tonometry: A Review
    Pearce, John G.
    Maddess, Ted
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2019, 28 (04) : 302 - 306