ASSESSMENT OF INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE BY APPLANATION AND REBOUND TONOMETRY IN GUINEA PIGS OF DIFFERENT AGES

被引:2
|
作者
Cairo, Marti
Teresa Pena, Maria
Rios, Jose
Melero, Adria
Martorell, Jaume
Leiva, Marta
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Fdn Hosp Clin Vet, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Fac Vet, Dept Med & Cirurgia Anim, Barcelona, Spain
[3] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Fac Med, Lab Biostat & Epidemiol, Biostat, Bellaterra 08193, Spain
[4] Hosp Clin Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Biostat & Data Management Platform, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
intraocular pressure; eye; laboratory animal; guinea pig; Cavia porcellus; OPHTHALMIC DIAGNOSTIC-TESTS; CIRCADIAN-RHYTHM; REFERENCE VALUES; CAVIA-PORCELLUS; CORNEAL SENSITIVITY; TEAR PRODUCTION; OCULAR GROWTH; DOGS; HORSES; EYE;
D O I
10.1053/j.jepm.2017.10.004
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Fifty-two guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus) with normal ophthalmic examinations were included in this study to determine whether there are differences in the intraocular pressure (IOP) according to age, while assessing the clinical usefulness of 2 different tonometry methods for this species. The animals were divided into 2 groups according to age: young (4 weeks old, 29 animals) and adult (3 to 36 months, 23 animals). Tonometry was performed oculus utro (OU) in the central cornea according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Only measurements with low standard deviation (SD < 5%) were included. Rebound tonometry was performed first OU; following topical anesthesia, applanation tonometry was then performed OU. The time required to obtain an IOP value was recorded for each eye. Descriptive statistics were calculated and Lin Concordance Coefficient (LCC) was performed to describe concordance between methods. Mean TonoVet IOP readings were 8.53 +/- 1.28 mmHg and 13.20 +/- 1.28 mmHg for young and adult animals, respectively (p < 0.05). Tono-Pen VET readings could not be obtained in young animals, but yielded a mean of 10.93 3.61 mmHg in adults. No differences were found between the left and right eyes (p > 0.05) nor between sexes (p > 0.05). TonoVet readings were obtained faster than Tono-Pen VET readings (less than 1 min vs 3.38 +/- 1.27 min, respectively [p < 0.05]). Lin Concordance Coefficient between methods was 0.37 (95% CI: 0.19 to 0.53), documenting a poor concordance between the 2 methods. This study found that normal IOP values are lower in young animals compared with adult animals. Moreover, the results obtained from this investigation demonstrated that TonoVet tonometry is a rapid and well-tolerated procedure when performed on guinea pigs of any age, whereas Tono-Pen VET tonometry is a more time-consuming technique that can only be used on guinea pigs older than 3 months. Copyright 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 31
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements Between Goldmann Applanation Tonometry and Reichert 7 Noncontact Tonometry
    Gungor, Sirel G.
    Akman, Ahmet
    Yazici, Ayse C.
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2015, 24 (06) : 438 - 441
  • [43] Assessment of intraocular pressure measured by Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer, Goldmann Applanation Tonometry, and Dynamic Contour Tonometry in healthy individuals
    Ouyang, Ping-Bo
    Li, Cong-Yi
    Zhu, Xiao-Hua
    Duan, Xuan-Chu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2012, 5 (01) : 102 - 107
  • [44] Assessing the Reliability of Intraocular Pressure Measurements Using Rebound Tonometry
    Realini, Tony
    McMillan, Brian
    Gross, Ronald L.
    Devience, Eva
    Balasubramani, Goundappa K.
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2021, 30 (08) : 629 - 633
  • [45] Intraocular Pressure Measured by Rebound Tonometry in Seven Raptor Species
    Yonez, Muhammed Kaan
    Erol, M.
    Erol, H.
    Atalan, G.
    Dogan, Z.
    Kibar, M.
    JOURNAL OF THE HELLENIC VETERINARY MEDICAL SOCIETY, 2022, 73 (02): : 3929 - 3934
  • [46] Comparisons of intraocular pressure measurements: Goldmann applanation tonometry, noncontact tonometry, Tono-Pen tonometry, and dynamic contour tonometry
    Hsu, S-Y
    Sheu, M-M
    Hsu, A-H
    Wu, K-Y
    Yeh, J-I
    Tien, J-N
    Tsai, R-K
    EYE, 2009, 23 (07) : 1582 - 1588
  • [47] Comparisons of intraocular pressure measurements: Goldmann applanation tonometry, noncontact tonometry, Tono-Pen tonometry, and dynamic contour tonometry
    S-Y Hsu
    M-M Sheu
    A-H Hsu
    K-Y Wu
    J-I Yeh
    J-N Tien
    R-K Tsai
    Eye, 2009, 23 : 1582 - 1588
  • [48] Corneal thickness and Intraocular pressure After DSAEK: comparison of Dynamic Contour tonometry with Goldmann Applanation tonometry
    Borges, Barbara
    Vicente, Andre
    Anjos, Rita
    Vieira, Luisa
    Santos, Arnaldo Dias
    Ferreira, Joana
    Maduro, Vitor
    Alves, Nuno
    Feijao, Joao
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2014, 55 (13)
  • [49] OCULAB TONO-PEN, GOLDMANN APPLANATION TONOMETRY, AND PNEUMATIC TONOMETRY FOR INTRAOCULAR-PRESSURE ASSESSMENT IN GAS-FILLED EYES
    HINES, MW
    JOST, BF
    FOGELMAN, KL
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1988, 106 (02) : 174 - 179
  • [50] Comparison of a rebound and an applanation tonometer for measuring intraocular pressure in normal rabbits
    Pereira, Fabiana Quartiero
    Bercht, Bernardo Stefano
    Soares, Mirian Gomes
    Bittencourt da Mota, Mauricio Grillo
    Tadeu Pigatto, Joao Antonio
    VETERINARY OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2011, 14 (05) : 321 - 326