ASSESSMENT OF INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE BY APPLANATION AND REBOUND TONOMETRY IN GUINEA PIGS OF DIFFERENT AGES

被引:2
|
作者
Cairo, Marti
Teresa Pena, Maria
Rios, Jose
Melero, Adria
Martorell, Jaume
Leiva, Marta
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Fdn Hosp Clin Vet, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Fac Vet, Dept Med & Cirurgia Anim, Barcelona, Spain
[3] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Fac Med, Lab Biostat & Epidemiol, Biostat, Bellaterra 08193, Spain
[4] Hosp Clin Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Biostat & Data Management Platform, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
intraocular pressure; eye; laboratory animal; guinea pig; Cavia porcellus; OPHTHALMIC DIAGNOSTIC-TESTS; CIRCADIAN-RHYTHM; REFERENCE VALUES; CAVIA-PORCELLUS; CORNEAL SENSITIVITY; TEAR PRODUCTION; OCULAR GROWTH; DOGS; HORSES; EYE;
D O I
10.1053/j.jepm.2017.10.004
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Fifty-two guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus) with normal ophthalmic examinations were included in this study to determine whether there are differences in the intraocular pressure (IOP) according to age, while assessing the clinical usefulness of 2 different tonometry methods for this species. The animals were divided into 2 groups according to age: young (4 weeks old, 29 animals) and adult (3 to 36 months, 23 animals). Tonometry was performed oculus utro (OU) in the central cornea according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Only measurements with low standard deviation (SD < 5%) were included. Rebound tonometry was performed first OU; following topical anesthesia, applanation tonometry was then performed OU. The time required to obtain an IOP value was recorded for each eye. Descriptive statistics were calculated and Lin Concordance Coefficient (LCC) was performed to describe concordance between methods. Mean TonoVet IOP readings were 8.53 +/- 1.28 mmHg and 13.20 +/- 1.28 mmHg for young and adult animals, respectively (p < 0.05). Tono-Pen VET readings could not be obtained in young animals, but yielded a mean of 10.93 3.61 mmHg in adults. No differences were found between the left and right eyes (p > 0.05) nor between sexes (p > 0.05). TonoVet readings were obtained faster than Tono-Pen VET readings (less than 1 min vs 3.38 +/- 1.27 min, respectively [p < 0.05]). Lin Concordance Coefficient between methods was 0.37 (95% CI: 0.19 to 0.53), documenting a poor concordance between the 2 methods. This study found that normal IOP values are lower in young animals compared with adult animals. Moreover, the results obtained from this investigation demonstrated that TonoVet tonometry is a rapid and well-tolerated procedure when performed on guinea pigs of any age, whereas Tono-Pen VET tonometry is a more time-consuming technique that can only be used on guinea pigs older than 3 months. Copyright 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 31
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of intraocular pressure measured by Pascal dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry
    J Y F Ku
    H V Danesh-Meyer
    J P Craig
    G D Gamble
    C N J McGhee
    Eye, 2006, 20 : 191 - 198
  • [32] Comparison of intraocular pressure measured by Pascal dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry
    Ku, JYF
    Danesh-Meyer, HV
    Craig, JP
    Gamble, GD
    McGhee, CNJ
    EYE, 2006, 20 (02) : 191 - 198
  • [33] Intraocular pressure measurements with applanation tonometry and with digital tonometry through the eyelids: Comparative results
    Karabatsas, CH
    Kotsimpou, K
    Chatzoulis, DZ
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2003, 44 : U372 - U372
  • [34] Comparison of intraocular pressure measurement between rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in treated glaucoma patients
    Vincent, Stephen J.
    Vincent, Roslyn A.
    Shields, David
    Lee, Graham A.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2012, 40 (04): : E163 - E170
  • [35] Intraocular pressure difference in goldmann applanation tonometry versus Perkins hand-held applanation tonometry in overweight patients
    dos Santos, MG
    Makk, S
    Berghold, A
    Eckhardt, M
    Haas, A
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1998, 105 (12) : 2260 - 2263
  • [36] Intraocular Pressure Measurements Using Rebound Tonometry in Eight Different Species of Companion Birds
    Karimi, Vahid
    Asadi, Faezeh
    Rajaei, Seyed Mehdi
    Golabdar, Salar
    JOURNAL OF AVIAN MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2020, 34 (04) : 338 - 342
  • [37] Overestimation of Intraocular Pressure by Goldmann Applanation Tonometry Without Astigmatic Correction
    Stewart, Rosalind M. K.
    Wishart, Peter K.
    Kaye, Stephen B.
    JAMA OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2016, 134 (03)
  • [38] Intraocular pressure and corneal thickness - A comparison between non-contact tonometry and applanation tonometry
    Domke, N.
    Hager, A.
    Wiegand, W.
    OPHTHALMOLOGE, 2006, 103 (07): : 583 - 587
  • [39] Intraocular pressure elevation after vitrectomy-Goldmann applanation tonometry measures lower intraocular pressure than dynamic contour tonometry
    Baeurle, Sebastian
    Viestenz, Anja
    Seitz, Berthold
    Viestenz, Arne
    OPHTHALMOLOGIE, 2022, 119 : S71 - S76
  • [40] Intraocular pressure elevation after vitrectomy-Goldmann applanation tonometry measures lower intraocular pressure than dynamic contour tonometry
    Baeurle, Sebastian
    Viestenz, Anja
    Seitz, Berthold
    Viestenz, Arne
    OPHTHALMOLOGE, 2022, 119 (SUPPL 1): : 71 - 76