ASSESSMENT OF INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE BY APPLANATION AND REBOUND TONOMETRY IN GUINEA PIGS OF DIFFERENT AGES

被引:2
|
作者
Cairo, Marti
Teresa Pena, Maria
Rios, Jose
Melero, Adria
Martorell, Jaume
Leiva, Marta
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Fdn Hosp Clin Vet, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Fac Vet, Dept Med & Cirurgia Anim, Barcelona, Spain
[3] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Fac Med, Lab Biostat & Epidemiol, Biostat, Bellaterra 08193, Spain
[4] Hosp Clin Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Biostat & Data Management Platform, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
intraocular pressure; eye; laboratory animal; guinea pig; Cavia porcellus; OPHTHALMIC DIAGNOSTIC-TESTS; CIRCADIAN-RHYTHM; REFERENCE VALUES; CAVIA-PORCELLUS; CORNEAL SENSITIVITY; TEAR PRODUCTION; OCULAR GROWTH; DOGS; HORSES; EYE;
D O I
10.1053/j.jepm.2017.10.004
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Fifty-two guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus) with normal ophthalmic examinations were included in this study to determine whether there are differences in the intraocular pressure (IOP) according to age, while assessing the clinical usefulness of 2 different tonometry methods for this species. The animals were divided into 2 groups according to age: young (4 weeks old, 29 animals) and adult (3 to 36 months, 23 animals). Tonometry was performed oculus utro (OU) in the central cornea according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Only measurements with low standard deviation (SD < 5%) were included. Rebound tonometry was performed first OU; following topical anesthesia, applanation tonometry was then performed OU. The time required to obtain an IOP value was recorded for each eye. Descriptive statistics were calculated and Lin Concordance Coefficient (LCC) was performed to describe concordance between methods. Mean TonoVet IOP readings were 8.53 +/- 1.28 mmHg and 13.20 +/- 1.28 mmHg for young and adult animals, respectively (p < 0.05). Tono-Pen VET readings could not be obtained in young animals, but yielded a mean of 10.93 3.61 mmHg in adults. No differences were found between the left and right eyes (p > 0.05) nor between sexes (p > 0.05). TonoVet readings were obtained faster than Tono-Pen VET readings (less than 1 min vs 3.38 +/- 1.27 min, respectively [p < 0.05]). Lin Concordance Coefficient between methods was 0.37 (95% CI: 0.19 to 0.53), documenting a poor concordance between the 2 methods. This study found that normal IOP values are lower in young animals compared with adult animals. Moreover, the results obtained from this investigation demonstrated that TonoVet tonometry is a rapid and well-tolerated procedure when performed on guinea pigs of any age, whereas Tono-Pen VET tonometry is a more time-consuming technique that can only be used on guinea pigs older than 3 months. Copyright 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 31
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Differential impact of prostaglandin analogues on agreement of intraocular pressure measurements obtained by Goldmann applanation, rebound, and noncontact tonometry
    Jung, Younhea
    Suh, Hyun
    Moon, Jung Il
    BMC OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [22] Effect of Repeated Applanation Tonometry on the Accuracy of Intraocular Pressure Measurements
    Gaton, Dan D.
    Ehrenberg, Miriam
    Lusky, Moshe
    Wussuki-Lior, Orly
    Dotan, Gad
    Weinberger, Dov
    Snir, Moshe
    CURRENT EYE RESEARCH, 2010, 35 (06) : 475 - 479
  • [23] Effect of Repeated Applanation Tonometry on the Accuracy of Intraocular Pressure Measurements
    Ehrenberg, M.
    Gaton, D.
    Lusky, M.
    Dotan, G.
    Weinberger, D.
    Snir, M.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2010, 51 (13)
  • [24] Comparison of intraocular pressure measured by Pascal dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry
    J Y F Ku
    H V Danesh-Meyer
    J P Craig
    G D Gamble
    C N J McGhee
    Eye, 2006, 20 : 191 - 198
  • [25] Comparison of intraocular pressure measured by Pascal dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry
    Ku, JYF
    Danesh-Meyer, HV
    Craig, JP
    Gamble, GD
    McGhee, CNJ
    EYE, 2006, 20 (02) : 191 - 198
  • [26] Comparison of intraocular pressure measurement between rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in treated glaucoma patients
    Vincent, Stephen J.
    Vincent, Roslyn A.
    Shields, David
    Lee, Graham A.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2012, 40 (04) : E163 - E170
  • [27] Effect of central corneal thickness on intraocular pressure with the rebound tonometer and the applanation tonometer in normal dogs
    Park, Young-Woo
    Jeong, Man-Bok
    Kim, Tae-Hyun
    Ahn, Jae-Sang
    Ahn, Jeong-Taek
    Park, Shin-Ae
    Kim, Se-Eun
    Seo, Kangmoon
    VETERINARY OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2011, 14 (03) : 169 - 173
  • [28] Reference Intervals for Intraocular Pressure Measured by Rebound Tonometry in Ten Raptor Species and Factors Affecting the Intraocular Pressure
    Reuter, Anne
    Mueller, Kerstin
    Arndt, Gisela
    Eule, Johanna Corinna
    JOURNAL OF AVIAN MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2011, 25 (03) : 165 - 172
  • [30] Assessment of intraocular pressure measured by Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer, Goldmann Applanation Tonometry, and Dynamic Contour Tonometry in healthy individuals
    Ouyang, Ping-Bo
    Li, Cong-Yi
    Zhu, Xiao-Hua
    Duan, Xuan-Chu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2012, 5 (01) : 102 - 107