ASSESSMENT OF INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE BY APPLANATION AND REBOUND TONOMETRY IN GUINEA PIGS OF DIFFERENT AGES

被引:2
|
作者
Cairo, Marti
Teresa Pena, Maria
Rios, Jose
Melero, Adria
Martorell, Jaume
Leiva, Marta
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Fdn Hosp Clin Vet, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Fac Vet, Dept Med & Cirurgia Anim, Barcelona, Spain
[3] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Fac Med, Lab Biostat & Epidemiol, Biostat, Bellaterra 08193, Spain
[4] Hosp Clin Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Biostat & Data Management Platform, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
intraocular pressure; eye; laboratory animal; guinea pig; Cavia porcellus; OPHTHALMIC DIAGNOSTIC-TESTS; CIRCADIAN-RHYTHM; REFERENCE VALUES; CAVIA-PORCELLUS; CORNEAL SENSITIVITY; TEAR PRODUCTION; OCULAR GROWTH; DOGS; HORSES; EYE;
D O I
10.1053/j.jepm.2017.10.004
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Fifty-two guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus) with normal ophthalmic examinations were included in this study to determine whether there are differences in the intraocular pressure (IOP) according to age, while assessing the clinical usefulness of 2 different tonometry methods for this species. The animals were divided into 2 groups according to age: young (4 weeks old, 29 animals) and adult (3 to 36 months, 23 animals). Tonometry was performed oculus utro (OU) in the central cornea according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Only measurements with low standard deviation (SD < 5%) were included. Rebound tonometry was performed first OU; following topical anesthesia, applanation tonometry was then performed OU. The time required to obtain an IOP value was recorded for each eye. Descriptive statistics were calculated and Lin Concordance Coefficient (LCC) was performed to describe concordance between methods. Mean TonoVet IOP readings were 8.53 +/- 1.28 mmHg and 13.20 +/- 1.28 mmHg for young and adult animals, respectively (p < 0.05). Tono-Pen VET readings could not be obtained in young animals, but yielded a mean of 10.93 3.61 mmHg in adults. No differences were found between the left and right eyes (p > 0.05) nor between sexes (p > 0.05). TonoVet readings were obtained faster than Tono-Pen VET readings (less than 1 min vs 3.38 +/- 1.27 min, respectively [p < 0.05]). Lin Concordance Coefficient between methods was 0.37 (95% CI: 0.19 to 0.53), documenting a poor concordance between the 2 methods. This study found that normal IOP values are lower in young animals compared with adult animals. Moreover, the results obtained from this investigation demonstrated that TonoVet tonometry is a rapid and well-tolerated procedure when performed on guinea pigs of any age, whereas Tono-Pen VET tonometry is a more time-consuming technique that can only be used on guinea pigs older than 3 months. Copyright 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 31
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Intraocular pressure with rebound tonometry and effects of topical intraocular pressure reducing medications in guinea pigs
    Di, Yue
    Luo, Xiu-Mei
    Qiao, Tong
    Lu, Na
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2017, 10 (02) : 186 - 190
  • [2] Intraocular pressure with rebound tonometry and effects of topical intraocular pressure reducing medications in guinea pigs
    Yue Di
    Xiu-Mei Luo
    Tong Qiao
    Na Lu
    International Journal of Ophthalmology, 2017, 10 (02) : 186 - 190
  • [3] Clinical differences in rebound tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry measurements of intraocular pressure in adult patients
    Chiu, Zelia
    Collins, Camille
    van der Straaten, David
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 50 (08): : 923 - 924
  • [4] Agreement of rebound and applanation tonometry intraocular pressure measurements during atmospheric pressure change
    Vercellin, Alice Verticchio
    Harris, Alon
    Siesky, Brent
    Zukerman, Ryan
    Tanga, Lucia
    Carnevale, Carmela
    Scarinci, Fabio
    Oddone, Francesco
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (10):
  • [5] Intraocular pressure in American Bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana) measured with rebound and applanation tonometry
    Cannizzo, Sarah A.
    Lewbart, Gregory A.
    Westermeyer, Hans D.
    VETERINARY OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2017, 20 (06) : 526 - 532
  • [6] Assessment of intraocular pressure in chinchillas of different age groups using rebound tonometry
    Yokoay Claros Chacaltana, Flor Diana
    Tadeu Pigatto, Joao Antonio
    Denardin, Ione Terezinha
    CIENCIA RURAL, 2016, 46 (08): : 1466 - 1471
  • [7] Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements Obtained by Rebound, Noncontact, and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry in Children
    Vodencarevic, Amra Nadarevic
    Jusufovic, Vahid
    Terzic, Svjetlana
    Halilbasic, Meliha
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2016, 163 : 192 - 192
  • [8] Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements Obtained by Rebound, Noncontact, and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry in Children
    Feng, Chi Shian
    Jin, Ki Won
    Yi, Kayoung
    Choi, Dong Gyu
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2015, 160 (05) : 937 - 943
  • [9] Evaluation of intraocular pressure in conscious ferrets (Mustela putorius furo) by means of rebound tonometry and comparison with applanation tonometry
    Di Girolamo, N.
    Andreani, V.
    Guandalini, A.
    Selleri, P.
    VETERINARY RECORD, 2013, 172 (15) : 396 - +
  • [10] Dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry: correlation with intracameral assessment of intraocular pressure
    Riva, Ivano
    Quaranta, Luciano
    Russo, Andrea
    Katsanos, Andreas
    Rulli, Eliana
    Floriani, Irene
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2012, 22 (01) : 55 - 62