World geothermal power production status: Energy, environmental and economic study of high enthalpy technologies

被引:131
|
作者
Chamorro, Cesar R. [1 ]
Mondejar, Maria E. [1 ]
Ramos, Roberto [1 ]
Segovia, Jose J. [1 ]
Martin, Maria C. [1 ]
Villamanan, Miguel A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Valladolid, Escuela Ingn Ind, Dpto Ingn Energet & Fluidomecan, Grp Termodinam & Calibrac TERMOCAL, E-47011 Valladolid, Spain
关键词
Geothermal energy; Geothermal power plant; Dry Steam; Flash steam; ELECTRICITY-GENERATION; PLANTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2011.06.005
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
The current world status of geothermal electricity production, including installed capacities, number of units and energy produced by exploitation technology, is presented in this paper. Four geothermal model plants based on different modes of high enthalpy technologies are analyzed from energy, environmental and economic points of view for specific reservoir characteristics. Once process parameters are optimized for the best plant operation, a cost and financial analysis is performed within a given economic frame. This analysis shows that Dry Steam power plants are the most efficient. Flash steam power plants increase their exergy efficiency with increasing reservoir temperature. Double Flash technology raises the energy produced with respect to Single Flash between 17 and 25%. and economic parameters become better. An additional third flash process increases power production by 10%, but economic parameters are not improved unless a reservoir of very high temperatures is considered. The energy and economic study conclude that the choice of the best flash technology depends on the resource characteristics, the financial frame and the technology costs. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:10 / 18
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Risk analysis of high enthalpy fluid storage in geothermal power systems
    Nivolianitou, Z.
    Kondili, E.
    Piperidis, G.
    SAFETY AND RELIABILITY - SAFE SOCIETIES IN A CHANGING WORLD, 2018, : 1743 - 1747
  • [22] Power plant selection for medium to high enthalpy geothermal resources of Turkey
    Ates, H. Kivanc
    Serpen, U.
    ENERGY, 2016, 102 : 287 - 301
  • [23] The environmental impact of renewable energy technologies shown in case of ORC-Based Geothermal Power Plant
    Matuszewska, D.
    Kuta, M.
    Gorski, J.
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THE SUSTAINABLE ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 214
  • [24] Geothermal power production, Worldwide current status and perspectives
    Chamorro-Camazon, Cesar
    DYNA, 2009, 84 (01): : 44 - 51
  • [25] Energy, exergy, and economic analysis of a geothermal power plant
    Kazemi H.
    Ehyaei M.A.
    Advances in Geo-Energy Research, 2018, 2 (02): : 190 - 209
  • [26] Production and Economic Effects of Using Geothermal Energy in Agribusiness
    Babovic, Jovan
    Sipovac, Radica
    Tasic, Slavka
    Djukic, Dusan
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2013 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATERIAL SCIENCE AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING (MSEE 2013), 2013, : 38 - 42
  • [27] Economic and environmental assessment using emergy of a geothermal power plant
    Jalili, Mohammad
    Chitsaz, Ata
    Hashemian, Mehran
    Rosen, Marc A.
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 228
  • [28] Technical, economic, and environmental assessment of the distribution power system with the application of renewable energy technologies
    Adefarati, T.
    Bansal, R.C.
    Bettayeb, M.
    Naidoo, R.
    Renewable Energy, 2022, 199 : 278 - 297
  • [29] Integrated Geothermal Energy Systems for Small-Scale Combined Heat and Power Production: Energy and Economic Investigation
    Morrone, Pietropaolo
    Algieri, Angelo
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2020, 10 (19):
  • [30] The status of world geothermal power generation 1995-2000
    Huttrer, GW
    GEOTHERMICS, 2001, 30 (01) : 1 - 27