Form and function: The significance of material properties in the design of tensile fabric structures

被引:94
作者
Bridgens, B. [1 ]
Birchall, M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Newcastle Univ, Sch Civil Engn & Geosci, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, Tyne & Wear, England
[2] Buro Happold, Bath BA2 3DQ, Avon, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Fabric structure; Form-finding; Tensile; Membrane; Efficient design; Hypar; Conic; Barrel vault; WIND; ROOF;
D O I
10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.05.044
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Coated woven fabrics have been used in state-of-the-art structures for over 40 years yet their design is not codified and relies heavily on experience and precedent. The mechanical behaviour of fabrics is non-linear and time dependent, with assumed or highly simplified material properties commonly used for analysis. The shape of a tensile fabric canopy is fundamental to its ability to resist all applied loads in tension. Increasingly Architects are moving away from conventional fabric forms, utilising lower levels of curvature and new materials. This paper considers the importance of material properties and structural geometry in the design and analysis of tensile fabric structures. Three typical tensile forms are examined: the conic, hyperbolic paraboloid ('hypar') and barrel vault. Whilst the barrel vault demonstrates the expected result that minimally curved structures are inefficient and highly sensitive to changes in materials properties, the hypar exhibits more complex behaviour with the structural action varying dramatically with changes in geometry, material properties and patterning (fabrication) direction. For conic structures the feasible geometries that can be attained using 'soap film' form-finding is established, which combined with checks for ponding provide a range of geometric parameters for the efficient design of conic structures. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 12
页数:12
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 5510 ASCESEI
[2]  
Barnes M. R., 1999, International Journal of Space Structures, V14, P89, DOI [10.1260/0266351991494722, DOI 10.1260/0266351991494722]
[3]   Calculating roof membrane deformation under simulated moderate wind uplift pressures [J].
Baskaran, A. ;
Murty, B. ;
Wu, J. .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2009, 31 (03) :642-650
[4]   Form and function of tensile structures for permanent buildings [J].
Berger, H .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 1999, 21 (08) :669-679
[5]   Structural optimization and form finding of light weight structures [J].
Bletzinger, KU ;
Ramm, E .
COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 2001, 79 (22-25) :2053-2062
[6]  
Borgart Andrew, 2010, International Journal of Space Structures, V25, P83, DOI 10.1260/0266-3511.25.2.83
[7]  
Bridgens BN, 2010, TENSINET SYMPOSIUM 2010 - TENSILE ARCHITECTURE: CONNECTING PAST AND FUTURE, P49
[8]  
Bridgens Gosling., 2004, The Structural Engineer, V82, P28
[9]  
Bridgens Gosling., 2004, The Structural Engineer, V82, P21
[10]  
BSi, 1998, 1421 BSI BS EN ISO