Sampling error and double shrinkage estimation of minimum variance portfolios

被引:17
作者
Candelon, B. [2 ]
Hurlin, C. [3 ]
Tokpavi, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris Ouest Nanterre La Def, F-92000 Nanterre, France
[2] Univ Maastricht, Dept Econ, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Univ Orleans, Lab Econ Orleans, F-45067 Orleans 2, France
关键词
Global Minimum Variance Portfolio; Sampling error; Double shrinkage; Equality restricted ridge regression; NAIVE DIVERSIFICATION; VARIABLE SELECTION; PERFORMANCE; REGRESSION; MARKOWITZ; SHARPE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jempfin.2012.04.010
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Shrinkage estimators of the covariance matrix are known to improve the stability over time of the Global Minimum Variance Portfolio (GMVP), as they are less error-prone. However, the improvement over the empirical covariance matrix is not optimal for small values of n, the estimation sample size. For typical asset allocation problems, with n small, this paper aims at. proposing a new method to further reduce sampling error by shrinking once again traditional shrinkage estimators of the GMVP. First, we show analytically that the weights of any GMVP can be shrunk - within the framework of the ridge regression - towards the ones of the equally-weighted portfolio in order to reduce sampling error. Second, Monte Carlo simulations and empirical applications show that applying our methodology to the GMVP based on shrinkage estimators of the covariance matrix, leads to more stable portfolio weights, sharp decreases in portfolio turnovers, and often statistically lower (resp. higher) out-of-sample variances (resp. Sharpe ratios). These results illustrate that double shrinkage estimation of the GMVP can be beneficial for realistic small estimation sample sizes. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:511 / 527
页数:17
相关论文
共 40 条
[11]   THE CROSS-SECTION OF EXPECTED STOCK RETURNS [J].
FAMA, EF ;
FRENCH, KR .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1992, 47 (02) :427-465
[12]   AN EMPIRICAL BAYES APPROACH TO EFFICIENT PORTFOLIO SELECTION [J].
FROST, PA ;
SAVARINO, JE .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS, 1986, 21 (03) :293-305
[13]   FOR BETTER PERFORMANCE - CONSTRAIN PORTFOLIO WEIGHTS [J].
FROST, PA ;
SAVARINO, JE .
JOURNAL OF PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, 1988, 15 (01) :29-&
[14]  
Geske R., 2008, 0708 UCLA AND SCH
[15]   GENERALIZED CROSS-VALIDATION AS A METHOD FOR CHOOSING A GOOD RIDGE PARAMETER [J].
GOLUB, GH ;
HEATH, M ;
WAHBA, G .
TECHNOMETRICS, 1979, 21 (02) :215-223
[16]   Restricted ridge estimation [J].
Gross, E .
STATISTICS & PROBABILITY LETTERS, 2003, 65 (01) :57-64
[17]   THE EFFICIENT MARKET INEFFICIENCY OF CAPITALIZATION-WEIGHTED STOCK PORTFOLIOS [J].
HAUGEN, RA ;
BAKER, NL .
JOURNAL OF PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, 1991, 17 (03) :35-40
[18]   RIDGE REGRESSION - BIASED ESTIMATION FOR NONORTHOGONAL PROBLEMS [J].
HOERL, AE ;
KENNARD, RW .
TECHNOMETRICS, 1970, 12 (01) :55-&
[19]   Risk reduction in large portfolios: Why imposing the wrong constraints helps [J].
Jagannathan, R ;
Ma, TS .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2003, 58 (04) :1651-1683
[20]  
Jobson J. D., 1981, The Journal of Portfolio Management, V7, P70