Sampling error and double shrinkage estimation of minimum variance portfolios

被引:17
作者
Candelon, B. [2 ]
Hurlin, C. [3 ]
Tokpavi, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris Ouest Nanterre La Def, F-92000 Nanterre, France
[2] Univ Maastricht, Dept Econ, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Univ Orleans, Lab Econ Orleans, F-45067 Orleans 2, France
关键词
Global Minimum Variance Portfolio; Sampling error; Double shrinkage; Equality restricted ridge regression; NAIVE DIVERSIFICATION; VARIABLE SELECTION; PERFORMANCE; REGRESSION; MARKOWITZ; SHARPE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jempfin.2012.04.010
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Shrinkage estimators of the covariance matrix are known to improve the stability over time of the Global Minimum Variance Portfolio (GMVP), as they are less error-prone. However, the improvement over the empirical covariance matrix is not optimal for small values of n, the estimation sample size. For typical asset allocation problems, with n small, this paper aims at. proposing a new method to further reduce sampling error by shrinking once again traditional shrinkage estimators of the GMVP. First, we show analytically that the weights of any GMVP can be shrunk - within the framework of the ridge regression - towards the ones of the equally-weighted portfolio in order to reduce sampling error. Second, Monte Carlo simulations and empirical applications show that applying our methodology to the GMVP based on shrinkage estimators of the covariance matrix, leads to more stable portfolio weights, sharp decreases in portfolio turnovers, and often statistically lower (resp. higher) out-of-sample variances (resp. Sharpe ratios). These results illustrate that double shrinkage estimation of the GMVP can be beneficial for realistic small estimation sample sizes. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:511 / 527
页数:17
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN VARIABLE SELECTION AND DATA AUGMENTATION AND A METHOD FOR PREDICTION [J].
ALLEN, DM .
TECHNOMETRICS, 1974, 16 (01) :125-127
[2]   MEAN SQUARE ERROR OF PREDICTION AS A CRITERION FOR SELECTING VARIABLES [J].
ALLEN, DM .
TECHNOMETRICS, 1971, 13 (03) :469-&
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1977, REGRESSION ANAL EXAM
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1998, APPL REGRESSION ANAL
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2003, FINANCE LETT
[6]   ON THE SENSITIVITY OF MEAN-VARIANCE-EFFICIENT PORTFOLIOS TO CHANGES IN ASSET MEANS - SOME ANALYTICAL AND COMPUTATIONAL RESULTS [J].
BEST, MJ ;
GRAUER, RR .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 1991, 4 (02) :315-342
[7]  
Black F., 1992, Financial Analysts Journal, V48, P28, DOI DOI 10.2469/FAJ.V48.N5.28
[8]   THE EFFECT OF ERRORS IN MEANS, VARIANCES, AND COVARIANCES ON OPTIMAL PORTFOLIO CHOICE [J].
CHOPRA, VK ;
ZIEMBA, WT .
JOURNAL OF PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, 1993, 19 (02) :6-11
[9]   A Generalized Approach to Portfolio Optimization: Improving Performance by Constraining Portfolio Norms [J].
DeMiguel, Victor ;
Garlappi, Lorenzo ;
Nogales, Francisco J. ;
Uppal, Raman .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2009, 55 (05) :798-812
[10]   Optimal Versus Naive Diversification: How Inefficient is the 1/N Portfolio Strategy? [J].
DeMiguel, Victor ;
Garlappi, Lorenzo ;
Uppal, Raman .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2009, 22 (05) :1915-1953