Portal vein embolisation prior to hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases and the effects of periprocedure chemotherapy

被引:65
作者
Beal, I. K.
Anthony, S.
Papadopoulou, A.
Hutchins, R.
Fusai, G.
Begent, R.
Davies, N.
Tibballs, J.
Davidson, B.
机构
[1] UCL Royal Free Hosp NHS Trust, Dept Radiol, London NW3 2QG, England
[2] UCL Royal Free Hosp NHS Trust, Dept HPB Surg, London NW3 2QG, England
[3] UCL Royal Free Hosp NHS Trust, Dept Med Oncol, London NW3 2QG, England
[4] UCL Royal Free & Univ Coll Sch Med, London NW3 2QG, England
关键词
D O I
10.1259/bjr/29855825
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Portal vein embolisation (PVE) is an effective method of increasing future liver remnant (FLR) but may stimulate tumour growth. The effect of periprocedure chemotherapy has not been established. 15 consecutive patients underwent PVE prior to hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases with a FLR <30% of tumour-free liver (TFL). Liver and tumour volumes pre-PVE and 6 weeks post-PVE were calculated by CT or MRI volumetry and correlated with the periprocedure chemotherapy regimen. 1 PVE increased the FLR from 18 +/- 5% of TFL to 27 +/- 8% post-PVE (p < 0.01). Post-PVE chemotherapy did not prevent hypertrophy of the FLR but the volume increase with chemotherapy (median 89 ml, range 7-149 ml) was significantly reduced (median 135 ml, range 110-254 ml without chemotherapy) (p = 0.016). Tumour volume (TV) decreased in those receiving post-PVE chemotherapy (median TV decrease 8 ml, range -77 ml to +450 ml) and increased without chemotherapy (median TV increase 39 ml, range -58 ml to +239 ml). Of the 15 patients, eight underwent resection; four were not resected due to disease progression and three due to insufficient hypertrophy of the FLR. PVE increased the FLR by an average of 9% allowing resection in 50% of patients. Periprocedure chemotherapy did not prevent but did reduce hypertrophy. A trend towards tumour regression was observed.
引用
收藏
页码:473 / 478
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Extended hepatectomy in patients with hepatobiliary malignancies with and without preoperative portal vein embolization [J].
Abdalla, EK ;
Barnett, CC ;
Doherty, D ;
Curley, SA ;
Vauthey, JN .
ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2002, 137 (06) :675-680
[2]   Portal vein embolization: rationale, technique and future prospects [J].
Abdalla, EK ;
Hicks, ME ;
Vauthey, JN .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2001, 88 (02) :165-175
[3]  
Adam R, 2001, ANN SURG ONCOL, V8, P347
[4]   Percutaneous portal vein embolization increases the feasibility and safety of major liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in injured liver [J].
Azoulay, D ;
Castaing, D ;
Krissat, J ;
Smail, A ;
Hargreaves, GM ;
Lemoine, A ;
Emile, JF ;
Bismuth, H .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2000, 232 (05) :665-672
[5]   Resection of nonresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer after percutaneous portal vein embolization [J].
Azoulay, D ;
Castaing, D ;
Smail, A ;
Adam, R ;
Cailliez, V ;
Laurent, A ;
Lemoine, A ;
Bismuth, H .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2000, 231 (04) :480-486
[6]   Resection of nonresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy [J].
Bismuth, H ;
Adam, R ;
Levi, F ;
Farabos, C ;
Waechter, F ;
Castaing, D ;
Majno, P ;
Engerran, L .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1996, 224 (04) :509-520
[7]  
Caldwell S H, 1996, Liver Transpl Surg, V2, P438, DOI 10.1002/lt.500020606
[8]   PORTAL-VEIN EMBOLIZATION - UTILITY FOR INDUCING LEFT HEPATIC LOBE HYPERTROPHY BEFORE SURGERY [J].
DEBAERE, T ;
ROCHE, A ;
VAVASSEUR, D ;
THERASSE, E ;
INDUSHEKAR, S ;
ELIAS, D ;
BOGNEL, C .
RADIOLOGY, 1993, 188 (01) :73-77
[9]   Preoperative portal vein embolization for extension of hepatectomy indications [J].
deBaere, T ;
Roche, A ;
Elias, D ;
Lasser, P ;
Lagrange, C ;
Bousson, V .
HEPATOLOGY, 1996, 24 (06) :1386-1391
[10]  
ELIAS D, 1995, J AM COLL SURGEONS, V180, P213