Assessment of dosimetric impact of system specific geometric distortion in an MRI only based radiotherapy workflow for prostate

被引:40
|
作者
Gustafsson, C. [1 ,2 ]
Nordstrom, F. [3 ]
Persson, E. [1 ]
Brynolfsson, J. [4 ]
Olsson, L. E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Skane Univ Hosp, Dept Hematol Oncol & Radiat Phys, Lund, Sweden
[2] Lund Univ, Dept Med Phys, Malmo, Sweden
[3] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Dept Med Phys & Biomed Engn, Gothenburg, Sweden
[4] Spectron Med AB, Helsingborg, Sweden
来源
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY | 2017年 / 62卷 / 08期
关键词
MRI only; distortion; MRI radiotherapy; QA; synthetic CT; MRI treatment planning; RADIATION-THERAPY; ONLY RADIOTHERAPY; PHANTOM; CANCER; CT; ALGORITHM; SIMULATION; IMAGES; BRAIN; FIELD;
D O I
10.1088/1361-6560/aa5fa2
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Dosimetric errors in a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) only radiotherapy workflow may be caused by system specific geometric distortion from MRI. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact on planned dose distribution and delineated structures for prostate patients, originating from this distortion. A method was developed, in which computer tomography (CT) images were distorted using the MRI distortion field. The displacement map for an optimized MRI treatment planning sequence was measured using a dedicated phantom in a 3 T MRI system. To simulate the distortion aspects of a synthetic CT (electron density derived from MR images), the displacement map was applied to CT images, referred to as distorted CT images. A volumetric modulated arc prostate treatment plan was applied to the original CT and the distorted CT, creating a reference and a distorted CT dose distribution. By applying the inverse of the displacement map to the distorted CT dose distribution, a dose distribution in the same geometry as the original CT images was created. For 10 prostate cancer patients, the dose difference between the reference dose distribution and inverse distorted CT dose distribution was analyzed in isodose level bins. The mean magnitude of the geometric distortion was 1.97 mm for the radial distance of 200-250 mm from isocenter. The mean percentage dose differences for all isodose level bins, were <= 0.02% and the radiotherapy structure mean volume deviations were < 0.2%. The method developed can quantify the dosimetric effects of MRI system specific distortion in a prostate MRI only radiotherapy workflow, separated from dosimetric effects originating from synthetic CT generation. No clinically relevant dose difference or structure deformation was found when 3D distortion correction and high acquisition bandwidth was used. The method could be used for any MRI sequence together with any anatomy of interest.
引用
收藏
页码:2976 / 2989
页数:14
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Geometric and dosimetric impact of anatomical changes for MR-only radiation therapy for the prostate
    Nejad-Davarani, Siamak P.
    Sevak, Parag
    Moncion, Michael
    Garbarino, Kimberly
    Weiss, Steffen
    Kim, Joshua
    Schultz, Lonni
    Elshaikh, Mohamed A.
    Renisch, Steffen
    Glide-Hurst, Carri
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 20 (04): : 10 - 17
  • [2] Dosimetric impact of geometric distortions in an MRI-only proton therapy workflow for lung, liver and pancreas
    Dumlu, Hatice Selcen
    Meschini, Giorgia
    Kurz, Christopher
    Kamp, Florian
    Baroni, Guido
    Belka, Claus
    Paganelli, Chiara
    Riboldi, Marco
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR MEDIZINISCHE PHYSIK, 2022, 32 (01): : 85 - 97
  • [3] Validation of the dosimetric and geometric accuracy of MR-only treatment planning solution for prostate cancer radiotherapy
    Posiewnik, Michal
    Piotrowski, Tomasz
    WSPOLCZESNA ONKOLOGIA-CONTEMPORARY ONCOLOGY, 2021, 25 (04): : 241 - 245
  • [4] MR-PROTECT: Clinical feasibility of a prostate MRI-only radiotherapy treatment workflow and investigation of acceptance criteria
    Persson, Emilia
    Gustafsson, Christian Gustafsson
    Ambolt, Petra
    Engelholm, Silke
    Ceberg, Sofie
    Back, Sven
    Olsson, Lars E.
    Gunnlaugsson, Adalsteinn
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2020, 15 (01)
  • [5] Dosimetric evaluation of proton therapy for synthetic CT in an MRI-only workflow for prostate cancer
    Fridstrom, Kajsa M. L.
    Winter, Rene M.
    Hornik, Natalie
    Almberg, Sigrun S.
    Danielsen, Signe
    Redalen, Kathrine R.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 194 : S4683 - S4686
  • [6] MRI-Related Geometric Distortions in Stereotactic Radiotherapy Treatment Planning: Evaluation and Dosimetric Impact
    Pappas, Eleftherios P.
    Alshanqity, Mukhtar
    Moutsatsos, Argyris
    Lababidi, Hani
    Alsafi, Khalid
    Georgiou, Konstantinos
    Karaiskos, Pantelis
    Georgiou, Evangelos
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2017, 16 (06) : 1120 - 1129
  • [7] Commissioning of MRI-only based treatment planning procedure for external beam radiotherapy of prostate
    Kapanen, Mika
    Collan, Juhani
    Beule, Annette
    Seppala, Tiina
    Saarilahti, Kauko
    Tenhunen, Mikko
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2013, 70 (01) : 127 - 135
  • [8] Assessment of intrafractional prostate motion and its dosimetric impact in MRI-guided online adaptive radiotherapy with gating
    Xiong, Yuqing
    Rabe, Moritz
    Nierer, Lukas
    Kawula, Maria
    Corradini, Stefanie
    Belka, Claus
    Riboldi, Marco
    Landry, Guillaume
    Kurz, Christopher
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2023, 199 (06) : 544 - 553
  • [9] Clinical Experience in Patient-Specific QA for Prostate MRI-Only Workflow
    Fusella, Marco
    Nicoletto, Mattia
    Schifano, Marco Ciro
    Maffi, Erick
    Fiorentin, Davide
    Testolin, Alessandro
    Busato, Fabio
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 194 : S4909 - S4910
  • [10] Impact Assessment of Systemic Geometric Distortion in 1.5T Magnetic Resonance Imaging Simulation through Three-dimensional Geometric Distortion Phantom on Dosimetric Accuracy for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-only Prostate Treatment Planning
    Chaknam, Korawig
    Worapruekjaru, Ladawan
    Suphaphong, Sithiphong
    Stansook, Nualjun
    Sodkokkruad, Prapa
    Asavaphatiboon, Sawwanee
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 49 (03) : 356 - 362