You can't be better than me: The role of the reference point in modulating people's pursuit of wealth

被引:12
作者
Pittarello, Andrea [1 ]
Rubaltelli, Enrico [1 ]
Rumiati, Rino [1 ]
机构
[1] Dept Dev & Socializat Psychol, Padua, Italy
关键词
Reference point; Goal achievement; Social comparison; Performance; MULTIPLE REFERENCE POINTS; VARIABLE RISK PREFERENCES; SOCIAL COMPARISONS; REGULATORY FOCUS; PROSPECT-THEORY; ROLE-MODELS; SELF; SATISFACTION; FAIRNESS; DECISION;
D O I
10.1016/j.joep.2013.05.006
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Two experiments showed that participants use the achievements of others as reference points with which to compare their wealth. In turn, being better or worse than referent others exerted influence on participants' tendency to interpret ambiguous scenarios in a self favorable way. Experiment 1 revealed that participants who scored consistently below the average performance were more likely than participants who scored consistently above the average to exploit situations in which the rules were unclear. Experiment 2 provided participants with detailed information about their exact ranking within a hypothetical group of several individuals. Results showed that both participants who ranked above (second) and below (second-last) the average were willing to take advantage of ambiguous situations to improve their status. The level of detail of information about participants' performance allows a more precise evaluations of their achievements and shifts their attention toward the comparison in which they are worse off. Comparisons with relevant others modulate the pursuit of self-interest and greater wealth, and such effect may account for several dynamics in the society. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 76
页数:12
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]  
Adams J. F., 1963, J ABNORMAL SOCIAL PS, V84, P18
[2]  
ADAMS JS, 1965, ADV EXP SOC PSYCHOL, V2, P267
[3]  
Affleck G., 1991, SOCIAL COMP CONT THE, P361
[4]  
Ali MM., 2001, Atlantic Economic Journal, V29, P186, DOI [DOI 10.1007/BF02299137, 10.1007/bf02299137]
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1947, Theory of Games and Economic Behavior
[6]  
Baumeister R. F., 2001, Review of General Psychology, V5, P323, DOI [DOI 10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323, DOI 10.1037//1089-2680.5.4.323, 10.1037//1089-2680.5.4.323]
[7]   A REVERSE OUTCOME BIAS - THE INFLUENCE OF MULTIPLE REFERENCE POINTS ON THE EVALUATION OF OUTCOMES AND DECISIONS [J].
BOLES, TL ;
MESSICK, DM .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1995, 61 (03) :262-275
[8]   WHEN GULLIVER TRAVELS - SOCIAL-CONTEXT, PSYCHOLOGICAL CLOSENESS, AND SELF-APPRAISALS [J].
BROWN, JD ;
NOVICK, NJ ;
LORD, KA ;
RICHARDS, JM .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 62 (05) :717-727
[9]  
BROWN JD, 1992, J EXPT SOCIAL PSYCHO, V55, P445
[10]  
Cameron JS, 2009, PSYCHOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ETHICAL BEHAVIOR AND DECISION MAKING, P91