Two different formulations with equivalent effect? Comparison of serum estradiol suppression with monthly goserelin and trimonthly leuprolide in breast cancer patients

被引:21
作者
Aydiner, Adnan [1 ]
Kilic, Leyla [1 ]
Yildiz, Ibrahim [1 ]
Keskin, Serkan [1 ]
Sen, Fatma [1 ]
Kucucuk, Seden [2 ]
Karanlik, Hasan [3 ]
Muslumanoglu, Mahmut [4 ]
Igci, Abdullah [4 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Univ, Dept Med Oncol, Inst Oncol, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Istanbul Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Inst Oncol, Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Istanbul Univ, Dept Surg, Inst Oncol, Istanbul, Turkey
[4] Istanbul Univ, Dept Gen Surg, Istanbul Fac Med, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
Breast cancer; LHRH agonist; Premenopause; Estradiol; PREMENOPAUSAL PATIENTS; THERAPY; ACETATE; TAMOXIFEN; METAANALYSIS; STATISTICS; RECEPTOR; AGONIST;
D O I
10.1007/s12032-012-0354-1
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Data comparing the efficacy of monthly and trimonthly formulations of LHRH agonists are lacking. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of monthly goserelin and trimonthly leuprolide on estradiol levels. A total of 79 early breast cancer patients receiving LHRH agonists for at least 6 months were enrolled in the study. Serum estradiol, FSH and LH levels were measured before drug injection and at the one-month follow-up visit. Thirty-eight patients were treated with goserelin, and 41 patients were treated with leuprolide. Patient characteristics and histopathological variables did not differ between the groups. A comparison of the mean hormone levels between the two groups revealed no significant differences in FSH or estradiol levels (p = 0.143 and p = 0.683, respectively), but the median LH level was higher in the leuprolide group (p = 0.025). Among the patients who did not receive chemotherapy, LH levels were higher in the leuprolide arm (p = 0.028). Additionally, FSH levels were significantly higher in the patients over 40 years old (p = 0.02) and in those with tumours harbouring cERB-B2 receptor (p = 0.05) in the leuprolide group. Three patients (7.9 %) in the goserelin and five patients (12.2 %) in the leuprolide group failed to achieve postmenopausal estradiol levels (p = 0.707). The effects of monthly goserelin and trimonthly leuprolide on estradiol levels did not differ significantly. Further research is required to interpret the variable effects on gonadotropins in each subgroup and the relationship between LHRH agonists and survival.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Abe O, 2005, LANCET, V366, P2087, DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)66544-0
[2]   Randomized trial of adjuvant ovarian suppression in 926 premenopausal patients with early breast cancer treated with adjuvant chemotherapy [J].
Arriagada, R ;
Lê, MG ;
Spielmann, M ;
Mauriac, L ;
Bonneterre, J ;
Namer, M ;
Delozier, T ;
Hill, C ;
Tursz, T .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2005, 16 (03) :389-396
[3]   Adjuvant goserelin in pre-menopausal patients with early breast cancer: Results from the ZIPP study [J].
Baum, M. ;
Hackshaw, A. ;
Houghton, J. ;
Rutqvist ;
Fornander, T. ;
Nordenskjold, B. ;
Nicolucci, A. ;
Sainsbury, R. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2006, 42 (07) :895-904
[4]   Endocrinological and clinical evaluation of two depot formulations of leuprolide acetate in pre- and perimenopausal breast cancer patients [J].
Boccardo, F ;
Rubagotti, A ;
Amoroso, D ;
Agostara, B ;
Amadori, D ;
Gallo, L ;
Iacobelli, S ;
Massidda, B ;
Mesiti, M ;
Pacini, P ;
Tomao, S ;
Paganuzzi, M ;
Marroni, P .
CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 1999, 43 (06) :461-466
[5]   Clinical pharmacokinetics of goserelin [J].
Cockshott, ID .
CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 2000, 39 (01) :27-48
[6]  
CONN PM, 1991, NEW ENGL J MED, V324, P93
[7]   Chemoendocrine therapy for premenopausal women with axillary lymph node-positive, steroid hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: Results from INT 0101 (E5188) [J].
Davidson, NE ;
O'Neill, AM ;
Vukov, AM ;
Osborne, CK ;
Martino, S ;
White, DR ;
Abeloff, MD .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (25) :5973-5982
[8]   Benefit from adjuvant tamoxifen therapy in primary breast cancer patients according oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, EGF receptor and HER2 status [J].
Dowsett, M ;
Houghton, J ;
Iden, C ;
Salter, J ;
Farndon, J ;
A'Hern, R ;
Sainsbury, R ;
Baum, M .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2006, 17 (05) :818-826
[9]  
DOWSETT M, 1992, CLIN THER, V14, P97
[10]   PATHOLOGICAL PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN BREAST-CANCER .1. THE VALUE OF HISTOLOGICAL GRADE IN BREAST-CANCER - EXPERIENCE FROM A LARGE STUDY WITH LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP [J].
ELSTON, CW ;
ELLIS, IO .
HISTOPATHOLOGY, 1991, 19 (05) :403-410