Design as communication: exploring the validity and utility of relating intention to interpretation

被引:84
作者
Crilly, Nathan [1 ]
Good, David [2 ]
Matravers, Derek [3 ]
Clarkson, P. John [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Engn Design Ctr, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, England
[2] Univ Cambridge, Dept Social & Dev Psychol, Cambridge CB2 3RQ, England
[3] Univ Cambridge Emmanuel Coll, Cambridge CB2 3AP, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
aesthetics; communication; design models; interdisciplinarity; user-behaviour;
D O I
10.1016/j.destud.2008.05.002
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The relationship between how designers intend products to be interpreted and how they are subsequently interpreted has often been represented as a process of communication. However, such representations are attacked for allegedly implying that designers' intended meanings are somehow 'contained' in products and that those meanings are passively received by consumers. Instead, critics argue that consumers actively construct their own meanings as they engage with products, and therefore that designers' intentions are not relevant to this process. In contrast, this article asserts the validity and utility of relating intention to interpretation by exploring the nature of that relationship in design practice and consumer response. Communicative perspectives on design are thereby defended and new avenues of empirical enquiry are proposed. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:425 / 457
页数:33
相关论文
共 198 条
[1]  
ABERCROMBIE N, 1994, AUTHORITY CONSUMER, P43
[2]  
Ahmed S, 2006, PROCEEDINGS OF NORDDESIGN 2006 CONFERENCE, P372
[3]  
Andersen P. B., 1990, THEORY COMPUTER SEMI
[4]  
Anderson J.A., 1988, MEDIATED COMMUNICATI
[5]  
Ang I., 1996, LIVING ROOM WARS RET
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1979, MEANING URBAN ENV
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1988, The design of everyday things
[8]  
[Anonymous], SYMBOLS ARTIFACTS VI
[9]  
[Anonymous], WAYS READING ADV REA
[10]  
[Anonymous], USER CTR GRAPHIC DES