Acceptability semantics accounting for strength of attacks in argumentation

被引：21

作者：

Claudette, Cayrol ^{[1
]}

Caroline, Devred ^{[2
]}

Marie-Christine, Lagasquie-Schiex ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] IRIT UPS, Toulouse, France

[2] LERIA, Angers, France

来源：

ECAI 2010 - 19TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE | 2010年 / 215卷

关键词：

D O I：

10.3233/978-1-60750-606-5-995

中图分类号：

TP18 [人工智能理论];

学科分类号：

081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;

摘要：

We consider argumentation systems with several attack relations of different strength. We focus on the impact of various strength attacks on the semantics of such systems. First, we refine the classical notion of defence, by comparing the strength of an attack with the strength of a counter-attack. Then, we propose different ways to compare defenders, and sets of defenders. That enables us to define admissible sets offering a best defence for their elements.

引用

页码：995 / +

页数：2

共 8 条

[1]

Cayrol C., 2010, IRITRR201013FR LERIA

[2] ON THE ACCEPTABILITY OF ARGUMENTS AND ITS FUNDAMENTAL ROLE IN NONMONOTONIC REASONING, LOGIC PROGRAMMING AND N-PERSON GAMES [J].