Winners and losers:: Changes in Texas university admissions post-Hopwood

被引:60
作者
Long, Mark C. [1 ]
Tienda, Marta [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Ctr Studies Demog & Ecology, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Princeton Univ, Off Populat Res, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
关键词
college affirmative action; institutional responses; racial proxy indicators;
D O I
10.3102/0162373708321384
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This article evaluates changes in racial and ethnic composition of three Texas universities following the ban on affirmative action imposed by the 1996 Hopwood decision. The authors estimate the extent to which universities practiced affirmative action before the ban and evaluate how officers at these universities responded by changing relative weights accorded to various applicant characteristics. After assessing whether changes in the relative weights favored minority applicants, the degree to which these new policies succeeded in maintaining minority shares at their pre-Hopwood levels is simulated. This article finds that these universities complied with the Hopwood ruling such that direct advantages given to Black and Hispanic applicants disappeared (and in some cases became disadvantages). Although there is some evidence that universities changed the weights they placed on applicant characteristics in ways that aided underrepresented minority applicants, these changes were insufficient to restore Black and Hispanic applicants' share of admitted students.
引用
收藏
页码:255 / 280
页数:26
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Diversity, opportunity, and the shifting meritocracy in higher education [J].
Alon, Sigal ;
Tienda, Marta .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2007, 72 (04) :487-511
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, American Law and Economics Review
[3]  
*BARR ED SER INC, 1996, BARR PROF AM COLL
[4]  
BARR R, 2002, TOP 10 PERCENT POLIC
[5]  
BUCKS BK, 2004, LEGISLATING EQUAL AC
[6]   Would the elimination of affirmative action affect highly qualified minority applicants? Evidence from California and Texas [J].
Card, D ;
Krueger, AB .
INDUSTRIAL & LABOR RELATIONS REVIEW, 2005, 58 (03) :416-434
[7]   Does banning affirmative action lower college student quality? [J].
Chan, J ;
Eyster, E .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2003, 93 (03) :858-872
[8]  
*COLL BOARD, 1999, EFF SAT SCAL REC PER
[9]  
DORANS NJ, 2002, 200211 COLL BOARD
[10]   Admission preferences for minority students, athletes, and legacies at elite universities [J].
Espenshade, TJ ;
Chung, CY ;
Walling, JL .
SOCIAL SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2004, 85 (05) :1422-1446