Enabling Technologies of Industry 4.0 and Their Global Forerunners: An Empirical Study of the Web of Science Database

被引:9
作者
Knudsen, Mikkel Stein [1 ]
Kaivo-oja, Jari [1 ,2 ]
Lauraeus, Theresa [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Turku, Finland Futures Res Ctr, Turku 20014, Finland
[2] Kazimieras Simonavicius Univ, LT-02189 Vilnius, Lithuania
来源
KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT IN ORGANIZATIONS, KMO 2019 | 2019年 / 1027卷
关键词
Industry; 4.0; Web of Science; Technology foresight;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-030-21451-7_1
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
Knowledge management in organizations brings many benefits for R&D operations of companies and corporations. This empirical study demonstrates the power of large database analyses for industrial strategies and policy. The study is based on the Web of Science database (Core Collection, ISI) and provides an overview of the core enabling technologies of Industry 4.0, as well as the countries and regions at the forefront of the academic landscape within these technologies. The core technologies and technologies of Industry 4.0 and Manufacturing 4.0 are: (1) Internet of Things and related technologies (2) Radio Frequency Identification (RFID), (3) Wireless Sensor Network (WSN), and (4) ubiquitous computing. It also covers (5) Cloud computing technologies, including (6) Virtualization and (7) Manufacturing as a Service (MaaS), and new (8) Cyber-physical systems, such as (9) Digital Twin-technology and (10) Smart & Connected Communities. Finally, important for the manufacturing integration Industry 4.0 enabling technologies are (11) Service Oriented Architecture (SOA), (12) Business Process Management (BPM), and (13) Information Integration and Interoperability. All these key technologies and technology drivers were analysed in this empirical demonstration of knowledge management.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 13
页数:11
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Brettel M., 2014, International Journal of Mechanical, Aerospace, Industrial, Mechatronic and Manufacturing Engineering, V8, P37, DOI [10.5281/zenodo.1336426, 10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.213, DOI 10.1016/J.PROCIR.2015.02.213, DOI 10.5281/ZENODO.1336426]
[2]   Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses [J].
Falagas, Matthew E. ;
Pitsouni, Eleni I. ;
Malietzis, George A. ;
Pappas, Georgios .
FASEB JOURNAL, 2008, 22 (02) :338-342
[3]  
Fatta D.D., 2018, INT J MARKETS BUSINE, V3, P163, DOI [10.1504/ijmabs.2018.090514, DOI 10.1504/IJMABS.2018.090514]
[4]  
Foresti F., 2018, KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT
[5]  
Grieves M., 2017, Transdisciplinary perspectives on complex systems, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-38756-7_4, 10.1007/978-3-319-38756-74, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-38756-74]
[6]  
Henning K., 2013, Acatech - National Academy of Science and Engineering, DOI DOI 10.1080/00207543.2017.1308576
[7]   Industry 4.0 and the current status as well as future prospects on logistics [J].
Hofmann, Erik ;
Ruesch, Marco .
COMPUTERS IN INDUSTRY, 2017, 89 :23-34
[8]   REIMAGINING FINLAND AS A MANUFACTURING BASE: THE NEARSHORING POTENTIAL OF FINLAND IN AN INDUSTRY 4.0 PERSPECTIVE [J].
Kaivo-Oja, Jari ;
Knudsen, Mikkel Stein ;
Lauraeus, Theresa .
BUSINESS MANAGEMENT AND EDUCATION, 2018, 16 :65-80
[9]  
Knudsen M.S., 2018, FFRC BLOG 0820
[10]  
Lee HC, 2016, INT CONF INFORM INTE