Information professionals' participation in interdisciplinary research: a preliminary study of factors affecting successful collaborations

被引:15
作者
Lorenzetti, Diane L. [1 ]
Rutherford, Gayle [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Dept Community Hlth Sci, Fac Med, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6, Canada
[2] Univ Calgary, Fac Nursing, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6, Canada
关键词
biomedical research; interdisciplinary communication; interprofessional relations; interview; librarians; qualitative research; research; HEALTH-SCIENCES; COMPETENCE; MENTORSHIP; PROGRAMS; CAPACITY; TEAMS;
D O I
10.1111/hir.12003
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Objectives This pilot study explores the conditions that support or hinder information professionals' participation in interdisciplinary research teams. Methods We undertook a preliminary grounded theory study investigating factors that impact on information professionals' participation in interdisciplinary research. Four biomedical information professionals working in academic universities and teaching hospitals in Canada participated in semi-structured interviews. Grounded theory methods guided the data collection and analysis. Results Participants identified the conditions that support or hinder research participation as belonging to four distinct overlapping domains: client-level factors including preconceptions and researcher resistance; individual-level factors such as research readiness; opportunities that are most often made not found; and organisational supports. Conclusions Creating willingness, building preparedness and capitalising on opportunity appear crucial to successful participation in interdisciplinary research. Further exploration of the importance of educational, collegial and organisational supports may reveal additional data to support the development of a grounded theory regarding the facilitation of information professionals' engagement in interdisciplinary research.
引用
收藏
页码:274 / 284
页数:11
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Defining interdisciplinary research: Conclusions from a critical review of the literature [J].
Aboelela, Sally W. ;
Larson, Elaine ;
Bakken, Suzanne ;
Carrasquillo, Olveen ;
Formicola, Allan ;
Glied, Sherry A. ;
Haas, Janet ;
Gebbie, Kristine M. .
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2007, 42 (01) :329-346
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital
[3]  
Bindler RC, 2010, APPL NURS RES, V25, P95
[4]  
Blumer H., 1986, Symbolic Interactionism: perspective and Method
[5]  
Booth A, 2001, Health Info Libr J, V18, P175, DOI 10.1046/j.1471-1842.2001.00340.x
[6]  
Budge S., 2006, J COLL READING LEARN, V37, P71, DOI [10.1080/10790195.2006.10850194, DOI 10.1080/10790195.2006.10850194]
[7]   Building research competence in nursing through mentoring [J].
Byrne, MW ;
Keefe, MR .
JOURNAL OF NURSING SCHOLARSHIP, 2002, 34 (04) :391-396
[8]   How to develop and sustain a peer-mentored research work group [J].
Colling, K ;
Grabo, T ;
Rowe, M ;
Straneva, J .
JOURNAL OF PROFESSIONAL NURSING, 1998, 14 (05) :298-304
[9]   The informationist: A new health profession? [J].
Davidoff, F ;
Florance, V .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2000, 132 (12) :996-998
[10]   Ethical research in reflexive relationships [J].
Etherington, Kim .
QUALITATIVE INQUIRY, 2007, 13 (05) :599-616