Location still matters! How does geographic configuration influence the performance-enhancing advantages of FDI spillovers?

被引:13
作者
Wang, Elizabeth Yi [1 ]
Kafouros, Mario [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leeds, Leeds Univ Business Sch, Maurice Keyworth Bldg, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Manchester, Alliance Manchester Business Sch, Booth St West, Manchester M15 6PB, Lancs, England
关键词
FDI spillovers; Multi-location enterprises; Geographic dispersion; Emerging markets; China; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; FOREIGN DIRECT-INVESTMENT; ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY; MULTINATIONAL-ENTERPRISES; ECONOMIC-GEOGRAPHY; KNOWLEDGE; INNOVATION; FIRM; CAPABILITIES; LOCALIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.intman.2020.100777
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Although many studies on FDI spillovers either implicitly or explicitly consider the firm as a single-location entity, most countries are dominated by multi-location business groups that consist of several affiliates. Business groups and their affiliates operate in different subnational regions and vary in their responsibilities (i.e., research and development, manufacturing, and marketing & sales) as well as in their ability to coordinate internally and minimize spatial transaction costs. We argue that such variations in turn affect the ability of business groups to benefit from intra- and inter-regional FDI spillovers. We advance prior research by examining how the effects of FDI spillovers on the performance of indigenous business groups in China are influenced by 1) the location and the geographic dispersion of their portfolios of affiliates and 2) the responsibility of each affiliate. Our analysis shows that the geographic dispersion of business groups has a profound effect on how much they benefit from FDI spillovers. It also shows that business groups are particularly effective in exploiting FDI spillovers through affiliates with marketing & sales responsibilities, while affiliates with other responsibilities are not effective in doing so.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 82 条
[11]  
Bellak C., 2004, INT BUSINESS REV, V13, P1
[12]   Communities of Practice versus Organizational Climate: Which One Matters More to Dispersed Collaboration in the Front End of Innovation? [J].
Bertels, Heidi M. J. ;
Kleinschmidt, Elko J. ;
Koen, Peter A. .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2011, 28 (05) :757-772
[13]   MNEs as border-crossing multi-location enterprises: The role of discontinuities in geographic space [J].
Beugelsdijk, Sjoerd ;
Mudambi, Ram .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES, 2013, 44 (05) :413-426
[14]   Introduction: Place, space and organization-economic geography and the multinational enterprise [J].
Beugelsdijk, Sjoerd ;
McCann, Philip ;
Mudambi, Ram .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY, 2010, 10 (04) :485-493
[15]  
Birkinshaw J, 1998, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V19, P221, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199803)19:3<221::AID-SMJ948>3.0.CO
[16]  
2-P
[17]  
Blomstrom M., 1999, DETERMINANTS HOST CO
[18]  
Blomstrom M, 1998, Journal of Economic Surveys, V12, P247, DOI [10.1111/1467-6419.00056, DOI 10.1111/1467-6419.00056]
[19]   Mobility of skilled workers and co-invention networks: an anatomy of localized knowledge flows [J].
Breschi, Stefano ;
Lissoni, Francesco .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY, 2009, 9 (04) :439-468
[20]   Spaces and scales of innovation [J].
Bunnell, TG ;
Coe, NM .
PROGRESS IN HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, 2001, 25 (04) :569-589