Assessing floating treatment wetlands nutrient removal performance through a first order kinetics model and statistical inference

被引:39
作者
Wang, Chih-Yu [1 ]
Sample, David J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Polytech Inst & State Univ, Dept Biol Syst Engn, Hampton Rd Agr Res & Extens Ctr, Virginia Beach, VA 23455 USA
关键词
Floating treatment wetland; Pollution control; First order kinetics; Assessment model; Bootstrap; Uncertainty; NITROGEN REMOVAL; WASTE-WATER; STORMWATER TREATMENT; TREATMENT SYSTEMS; BED; VEGETATION; PLANTS; GROWTH; RIVER; URBAN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.09.019
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
A floating treatment wetland (FTW) is an ecological approach which seeks to reduce point and nonpoint source pollution in receiving waters. This technology has received increasing attention recently. Subsequent studies were conducted at worldwide locations; despite these efforts, reliable estimates of the FTW performance remains a significant research gap. This paper describes the development of a robust and simplified integrated FTW (i-FTW) model that includes uncertainty. The performance of FTWs was separated from other treatment processes ongoing within their respective water bodies. This approach facilitates generalization of the model and allowing parameters to adjust to each applied water body characteristic. A bootstrap method was incorporated to estimate uncertainty and generate more robust predictions of performance. Water concentration time series data were described by a first order kinetics i-FTW model that generates an FTW performance parameter: FTW apparent uptake velocity (v(f)). A comprehensive literature search of i-FTW studies was conducted to collect total phosphorus (TP) and total nitrogen (TN) concentrations data. The v(f) values were calculated from these studies and estimated using a bootstrap percentile method. The best estimation of median and expected range with 95% confidence interval of the v(f) were 0.048 (0.018-0.059) and 0.027 (0.016-0.040)m/day for TP and TN, respectively. The goodness of fit (R-2) of the i-FTW model on water concentration time series data of the i-FTW experiments was 0.92 +/- 0.30 for TP and 0.86 +/- 0.38 for TN data (mean +/- SD). This model provides insights into compartmental treatments of i-FTW systems and serves as a preliminary tool to select extent of FTW coverage when designing an i-FTW system. Further research to resolve limitations of model application is suggested. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:292 / 302
页数:11
相关论文
共 72 条
[11]  
Chernick M. R., 2008, Bootstrap methods, a guide for practitioners and researchers
[12]   Performance of a floating treatment wetland for in-stream water amelioration in NE Italy [J].
De Stefani, G. ;
Tocchetto, D. ;
Salvato, M. ;
Borin, M. .
HYDROBIOLOGIA, 2011, 674 (01) :157-167
[13]   Floating treatment wetlands for domestic wastewater treatment [J].
Faulwetter, J. L. ;
Burr, M. D. ;
Cunningham, A. B. ;
Stewart, F. M. ;
Camper, A. K. ;
Stein, O. R. .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 64 (10) :2089-2095
[14]  
Garbett R, 2005, WATER ENVIRON J, V19, P174
[15]  
Global Support Limited, 2013, WORLD CLIM GUID
[16]   Mercury net methylation in five tropical flood plain regions of Brazil: high in the root zone of floating macrophyte mats but low in surface sediments and flooded soils [J].
Guimaraes, JRD ;
Meili, M ;
Hylander, LD ;
Silva, EDE ;
Roulet, M ;
Mauro, JBN ;
de Lemos, RA .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2000, 261 (1-3) :99-107
[17]   Constructed Wetlands With Floating Emergent Macrophytes: An Innovative Stormwater Treatment Technology [J].
Headley, T. R. ;
Tanner, C. C. .
CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 42 (21) :2261-2310
[18]  
Hendricks D.W., 2006, WATER TREATMENT UNIT
[19]  
Hjorth JSU., 1994, COMPUTER INTENSIVE S
[20]  
HOEGER S, 1988, J SOIL WATER CONSERV, V43, P304