The significance of antral follicle size prior to stimulation in predicting ovarian response in a multiple dose GnRH antagonist protocol

被引:1
|
作者
Lai, Qiaohong [1 ]
Chen, Cai [1 ]
Zhang, Zhijun [1 ]
Zhang, Shu [1 ]
Yu, Qilin [1 ]
Yang, Ping [1 ]
Hu, Jun [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Cong-Yi [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Med Coll, Tongji Hosp, Ctr Biomed Res, Wuhan 430030, Peoples R China
[2] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Med Coll, Tongji Hosp, Ctr Ophthalmol, Wuhan 430030, Peoples R China
[3] Georgia Hlth Sci Univ, Dept Pathol, Ctr Biotechnol & Genom Med, Augusta, GA 30912 USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL PATHOLOGY | 2013年 / 6卷 / 02期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
IVF-ET; antral follicle count; antral follicle size; ovarian response; oocytes; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; STROMAL BLOOD-FLOW; ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGIES; ANTI-MULLERIAN HORMONE; SERUM INHIBIN-B; OVULATION INDUCTION; GONADOTROPIN STIMULATION; INFERTILE WOMEN; MATERNAL AGE; IVF-ET;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Prediction of ovarian responses prior to stimulation is not only useful for patient counseling, but also important in tailoring the optimal dosage of gonadotrophin for individual patients. By prospectively study of 214 women undergoing in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) treatment, we obtained data supporting that antral follicle size could be an additional valuable predictive marker other than the antral follicle count (AFC) in predicting ovarian response. Our studies revealed that AFC achieved the best predictive value in relation to the number of oocyte obtained, followed by antral follicle size, basal follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and body mass index (BMI). Unlike AFC, antral follicle size was noted to be negatively correlated with the dosage (R = -0.493) and duration (R = -0.465) of rFSH stimulation. Antral follicle size was also found with higher negative regression coefficient (B = -0.661) as compared with that of basal FSH concentration (B = -0.326) and BMI (b = -0.281). More importantly, women with antral follicle size 6-7mm showed significantly higher AFC, oocytes retrieved, fertilized oocytes and grade I/II embryos along with much lower transfer cycle cancellation rate (7.5% vs. 16-17%). Together, our data suggest that basal antral follicle size could be a valued predictive marker in women with IVF-ET treatment, in which women with antral follicle size 6-7mm are likely predisposed to better IVF-ET outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:258 / 266
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Nomogram to predict FSH starting dose in poor ovarian response women in progestin primed ovarian stimulation protocol
    Wu, Shuxie
    Li, Yanping
    Wu, Gao
    Wu, Hanbin
    BMC WOMENS HEALTH, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [22] Effectiveness of the flexible progestin primed ovarian stimulation protocol compared to the flexible GnRH antagonist protocol in women with decreased ovarian reserve
    Turkgeldi, Engin
    Yildiz, Sule
    Cekic, Sebile Guler
    Shakerian, Bahar
    Keles, Ipek
    Ata, Baris
    HUMAN FERTILITY, 2022, 25 (02) : 306 - 312
  • [23] Predictive factors for ovarian response in a corifollitropin alfa/GnRH antagonist protocol for controlled ovarian stimulation in IVF/ICSI cycles
    Sergio Oehninger
    Scott M. Nelson
    Pierre Verweij
    Barbara J. Stegmann
    Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, 13
  • [24] Is assessment of anti-mullerian hormone and/or antral follicle count useful in the prediction of ovarian response in expected normal responders treated with a fixed dose of recombinant FSH and GnRH antagonists? A prospective observational study
    Ganidou, Maria A.
    Kolibianakis, Efstratios M.
    Venetis, Christos A.
    Gerou, Spiros
    Makedos, Georgios A.
    Klearchou, Nikolaos
    Tarlatzis, Basil C.
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2014, 30 (11) : 817 - 821
  • [25] Predictive factors for ovarian response in a corifollitropin alfa/GnRH antagonist protocol for controlled ovarian stimulation in IVF/ICSI cycles
    Oehninger, Sergio
    Nelson, Scott M.
    Verweij, Pierre
    Stegmann, Barbara J.
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY AND ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2015, 13
  • [26] Is AMH useful to reduce low ovarian response to GnRH antagonist protocol in oocyte donors?
    Martinez, Francisca
    Clua, Elisabet
    Carreras, Olga
    Tur, Rosa
    Rodriguez, Ignacio
    Barri, Pere N.
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2013, 29 (08) : 754 - 757
  • [27] GnRH antagonist versus follicular-phase single-dose GnRH agonist protocol in patients of normal ovarian responses during controlled ovarian stimulation
    Geng, Yudi
    Xun, Yang
    Hu, Shiqiao
    Lai, Qiaohong
    Jin, Lei
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2019, 35 (04) : 309 - 313
  • [28] Poor prognosis for ovarian response to stimulation: results of a randomised trial comparing the flare-up GnRH agonist protocol vs. the antagonist protocol
    Devesa, Marta
    Martinez, Francisca
    Coroleu, Buenaventura
    Tur, Rosa
    Gonzalez, Clara
    Rodriguez, Ignacio
    Barri, Pedro N.
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2010, 26 (07) : 509 - 515
  • [29] Stop GnRH-Agonist Combined With Multiple-Dose GnRH-Antagonist Protocol for Patients With "Genuine" Poor Response Undergoing Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation for IVF
    Orvieto, Raoul
    Kirshenbaum, Michal
    Galiano, Valentina
    Elkan-Miller, Tal
    Zilberberg, Eran
    Haas, Jigal
    Nahum, Ravit
    FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2020, 11
  • [30] Repeated ovarian stimulation with corifollitropin alfa in patients in a GnRH antagonist protocol: no concern for immunogenicity
    Norman, Robert J.
    Zegers-Hochschild, Fernando
    Salle, Bruno S.
    Elbers, Jolanda
    Heijnen, Esther
    Marintcheva-Petrova, Maya
    Mannaerts, Bernadette
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2011, 26 (08) : 2200 - 2208