MCDM based on Reciprocal Judgment Matrix: a Comparative Study of E-VIKOR and E-TOPSIS Algorithmic Methods with Interval Numbers

被引:0
作者
Dou, Yajie [1 ]
Zhang, Pengle [1 ]
Jiang, Jiang [1 ]
Yang, Kewei [1 ]
Chen, Yingwu [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Def Technol, Coll Informat Syst & Management, Changsha 410073, Hunan, Peoples R China
来源
APPLIED MATHEMATICS & INFORMATION SCIENCES | 2014年 / 8卷 / 03期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM); reciprocal judgment matrix; E-VIOKR; E-TOPSIS; interval numbers; DECISION-MAKING PROBLEM; EXTENSION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
O29 [应用数学];
学科分类号
070104 ;
摘要
Interval number is a useful tool to handle the uncertainty brought by human factors in multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) process. When faced with MCDM problems in real-world, the experts may be uncomfortable giving precise upper and lower bounds of the interval ratios on multi-criteria. Based on the reciprocal judgment matrices given by the experts through pairwise comparisons, the satisfaction degree of the multiple alternatives on single criterion is defined and the interval ratios was elicited by a linear programming model. The TOPSIS and VIKOR methods are extended with interval number and algorithmic E-VIKOR and E-TOPSIS methods are proposed. Finally, a numerical example of ranking indirect-fire weapon system alternative is given and a comparative experimental study is carried out based on the experts reciprocal judgment matrices generated by Monte Carlo simulation. The result illustrates the feasibilities and distinctive features of the two algorithmic methods.
引用
收藏
页码:1401 / 1411
页数:11
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2012, MANAGEMENT SCI LETT, DOI [DOI 10.5267/J.MSL.2012.07.019, DOI 10.5267/j.msl.2012.07.019]
  • [2] APPLICATIONS OF DECISION-ANALYSIS TO THE MILITARY SYSTEMS ACQUISITION PROCESS
    BUEDE, DM
    BRESNICK, TA
    [J]. INTERFACES, 1992, 22 (06) : 110 - 125
  • [3] RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN MODELING PREFERENCES - UNCERTAINTY AND AMBIGUITY
    CAMERER, C
    WEBER, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 1992, 5 (04) : 325 - 370
  • [4] Weapon selection using the AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment
    Dagdeviren, Metin
    Yavuz, Serkan
    Kilinc, Nevzat
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2009, 36 (04) : 8143 - 8151
  • [5] Guitoni A., 1998, J OPERATIONAL RES, V109, P21
  • [6] Guo P., 2007, B INT STAT I P 56 SE
  • [7] Decision making with interval probabilities
    Guo, Peijun
    Tanaka, Hideo
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2010, 203 (02) : 444 - 454
  • [8] Hwang Ching-Lai, 1981, MULTIPLE ATTRIBUTE D, P58
  • [9] An algorithmic method to extend TOPSIS for decision-making problems with interval data
    Jahanshahloo, G. R.
    Lotfi, F. Hosseinzadeh
    Izadikhah, M.
    [J]. APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTATION, 2006, 175 (02) : 1375 - 1384
  • [10] Cost-efficiency analysis of weapon system portfolios
    Kangaspunta, Jussi
    Liesio, Juuso
    Salo, Ahti
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2012, 223 (01) : 264 - 275