Unilateral Approach for Bilateral Decompression of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Minimal Invasive Surgery

被引:1
作者
Usman, Muhammad [1 ]
Ali, Mumtaz [1 ]
Khanzada, Khalid [1 ]
Ishaq, Mohammad [1 ]
Naeem-ul-Haq [1 ]
Aman, Raza [1 ]
Ali, Mohammad [1 ]
机构
[1] Lady Reading Hosp, Postgrad Med Inst, Dept Neurosurg, Peshawar, Pakistan
来源
JCPSP-JOURNAL OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS PAKISTAN | 2013年 / 23卷 / 12期
关键词
Unilateral approach; Lumbar spinal stenosis; Laminectomy; Minimal invasive surgery; PARASPINAL MUSCLES; CANAL STENOSIS; LAMINECTOMY; LAMINOTOMY; MICRODECOMPRESSION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess the feasibility and efficacy of a novel, minimally invasive spinal surgery technique for the correction of lumbar spinal stenosis involving unilateral approach for bilateral decompression. Study Design: Cross-sectional observational study. Place and Duration of Study: Neurosurgery Department of PGMI, Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar, from January to December 2010. Methodology: A total of 60 patients with lumbar stenosis were randomly assigned to undergo either a conventional laminectomy (30 patients, Group A), or a unilateral approach (30 patients, Group B). Clinical outcomes was measured using the scale of Finneson and Cooper. All the data was collected by using a proforma and different parameters were assessed for a minimum follow-up period of three months. Data was analyzed by descriptive statistics using SPSS software version 17. Results: Adequate decompression was achieved in all patients. Compared with patients in the conventional laminectomy group, patients who received the novel procedure (unilateral approach) had a reduced mean duration of hospital stay, a faster recovery rate and majority of the patients (88.33%) had an excellent to fair operative result according to the Finneson and Cooper scale. Five major complications occurred in all patient groups, 2 patients had unintended dural rent and 2 wound dehiscence each and fifth patient had worsening of symptoms. There was no mortality in the series. Conclusion: The ultimate goal of the unilateral approach to treat lumbar spinal stenosis is to achieve adequate decompression of the neural elements. An additional benefit of a minimally invasive approach is adequate preservation of vertebral stability, as it requires only minimal muscle trauma, preservation of supraspinous/intraspinous ligament complex and spinous process, therefore, allows early mobilization. This also shortens the hospital stay, reduces postoperative back pain, and leads to satisfactory outcome.
引用
收藏
页码:852 / 856
页数:5
相关论文
共 24 条
[21]   Quantitative outcome and radiographic comparisons between laminectomy and laminotomy in the treatment of acquired lumbar stenosis [J].
Thomas, NWM ;
Rea, GL ;
Pikul, BK ;
Mervis, LJ ;
Irsik, R ;
McGregor, JM .
NEUROSURGERY, 1997, 41 (03) :567-574
[22]   Microdecompression for lumbar spinal canal stenosis [J].
Weiner, BK ;
Walker, M ;
Brower, RS ;
McCulloch, JA .
SPINE, 1999, 24 (21) :2268-2272
[23]   Postoperative outcome after modified unilateral-approach microendoscopic midline decompression for degenerative spinal stenosis Clinical article [J].
Yagi, Mitsuru ;
Okada, Eijiro ;
Ninomiya, Ken ;
Kihara, Michiya .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2009, 10 (04) :293-299
[24]   RELIEF OF LUMBAR CANAL STENOSIS USING MULTILEVEL SUBARTICULAR FENESTRATIONS AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO WIDE LAMINECTOMY - PRELIMINARY-REPORT [J].
YOUNG, S ;
VEERAPEN, R ;
OLAOIRE, SA .
NEUROSURGERY, 1988, 23 (05) :628-633