Too Little or too much? Exploring U-shaped Relationships between Corporate Environmental Performance and Corporate Financial Performance

被引:355
作者
Trumpp, Christoph [1 ]
Guenther, Thomas [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Dresden, Business Management, Esp Management Accounting & Control, Dresden, Germany
关键词
corporate environmental performance (CEP); corporate financial performance (CFP); non-linear relationship; sustainable development; U-shaped relationship; RESOURCE-BASED VIEW; ECONOMIC-PERFORMANCE; SOCIAL PERFORMANCE; FIRM PERFORMANCE; ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE; STAKEHOLDER THEORY; SUSTAINABILITY; MANAGEMENT; GREEN; RESPONSIBILITY;
D O I
10.1002/bse.1900
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Despite 40years of research on the relationship between corporate environmental performance (CEP) and corporate financial performance (CFP), there is no generally accepted theoretical framework that explains the contradictory results that have emerged. This unsatisfactory status may be attributed to the fact that linear models dominate the research. Based on an international sample of 2361 firm-years from 2008 to 2012, we find empirical evidence of a non-linear, specifically a U-shaped, relationship between carbon performance and profitability as well as between waste intensity and profitability. The same result holds for the relationship between carbon performance and stock market performance, but solely for manufacturing industries. Our empirical findings provide evidence for the theoretical framework of a too-little-of-a-good-thing' (TLGT) effect, which indicates that the type of relationship (positive, negative) depends on the level of CEP. More precisely, there is a negative CEP-CFP relationship for companies with low CEP and a positive association for high CEP. Copyright (c) 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 68
页数:20
相关论文
共 99 条
[61]   CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY, NOISE, AND STOCK MARKET VOLATILITY [J].
Orlitzky, Marc .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES, 2013, 27 (03) :238-254
[62]   TIGHTENING ENVIRONMENTAL STANDARDS - THE BENEFIT-COST OR THE NO-COST PARADIGM [J].
PALMER, K ;
OATES, WE ;
PORTNEY, PR .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 1995, 9 (04) :119-132
[63]   Estimating Standard Errors in Finance Panel Data Sets: Comparing Approaches [J].
Petersen, Mitchell A. .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2009, 22 (01) :435-480
[64]   The Too-Much-of-a-Good-Thing Effect in Management [J].
Pierce, Jason R. ;
Aguinis, Herman .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2013, 39 (02) :313-338
[65]   TOWARD A NEW CONCEPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT-COMPETITIVENESS RELATIONSHIP [J].
PORTER, ME ;
VANDERLINDE, C .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 1995, 9 (04) :97-118
[66]  
PORTER ME, 1995, HARVARD BUS REV, V73, P120
[67]  
Preston L. E., 1997, Business & Society, V36, P419, DOI [10.1177/000765039703600406, DOI 10.1177/000765039703600406]
[68]   A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability [J].
Russo, MV ;
Fouts, PA .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1997, 40 (03) :534-559
[69]  
Salzmann O., 2005, European Management Journal, V23, P27, DOI 10.1016/j.emj.2004.12.007
[70]   An empirical evaluation of environmental efficiencies and firm performance: Pollution prevention versus end-of-pipe practice [J].
Sarkis, J ;
Cordeiro, JJ .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2001, 135 (01) :102-113