Improving efficiencies of flood forecasting during lead times: an operational method and its application in the Baiyunshan Reservoir

被引:3
作者
Liu, Pan [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Xiaojing [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, Yan [3 ]
Deng, Chao [1 ,2 ]
Li, Zejun [1 ,2 ]
Xiong, Mengsi [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ, State Key Lab Water Resources & Hydropower Engn S, Wuhan 430072, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Hubei Prov Collaborat Innovat Ctr Water Resources, Wuhan 430072, Hubei, Peoples R China
[3] Pearl River Hydraul Res Inst, Guangzhou 510610, Guangdong, Peoples R China
来源
HYDROLOGY RESEARCH | 2019年 / 50卷 / 02期
基金
国家重点研发计划; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
flood forecasting; lead time; objective function; Xinanjiang model; RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODEL; PARAMETER UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; XINANJIANG MODEL; CALIBRATION; PERFORMANCE; INFLOW; PRECIPITATION; SIMULATION; RULES;
D O I
10.2166/nh.2018.051
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
Accurate and reliable flood forecasting plays an important role in flood control, reservoir operation, and water resources management. Conventional hydrological parameter calibration is based on an objective function without consideration for forecast performance during lead-time periods. A novel objective function, i.e., minimizing the sum of the squared errors between forecasted and observed streamflow during multiple lead times, is proposed to calibrate hydrological parameters for improved forecasting. China's Baiyunshan Reservoir basin was selected as a case study, and the Xinanjiang model was used. The proposed method provided better results for peak flows, in terms of the value and occurrence time, than the conventional method. Specifically, the qualified rate of peak flow for 4-, 5-, and 6-h lead times in the proposed method were 69.2%, 53.8%, and 38.5% in calibration, and 60%, 40%, and 20% in validation, respectively. This compares favorably with the corresponding values for the conventional method, which were 53.8%, 15.4%, and 7.7% in calibration, and 20%, 20%, and 0% in validation, respectively. Uncertainty analysis revealed that the proposed method caused less parameter uncertainty than the conventional method. Therefore, the proposed method is effective in improving the performance during multiple lead times for flood mitigation.
引用
收藏
页码:709 / 724
页数:16
相关论文
共 67 条
[31]   Time stability of catchment model parameters: Implications for climate impact analyses [J].
Merz, Ralf ;
Parajka, Juraj ;
Bloeschl, Guenter .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2011, 47
[32]   WRF model performance analysis for a suite of simulation design [J].
Mohan, Manju ;
Sati, Ankur Prabhat .
ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH, 2016, 169 :280-291
[33]   Comparison of different multi-objective calibration criteria using a conceptual rainfall-runoff model of flood events [J].
Moussa, R. ;
Chahinian, N. .
HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2009, 13 (04) :519-535
[34]  
Nash JE., 1970, J HYDROL, V10, P282, DOI DOI 10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6
[35]   Benchmarking hydrological models for low-flow simulation and forecasting on French catchments [J].
Nicolle, P. ;
Pushpalatha, R. ;
Perrin, C. ;
Francois, D. ;
Thiery, D. ;
Mathevet, T. ;
Le Lay, M. ;
Besson, F. ;
Soubeyroux, J. -M. ;
Viel, C. ;
Regimbeau, F. ;
Andreassian, V. ;
Maugis, P. ;
Augeard, B. ;
Morice, E. .
HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2014, 18 (08) :2829-2857
[36]   Effect of formal and informal likelihood functions on uncertainty assessment in a single event rainfall-runoff model [J].
Nourali, Mahrouz ;
Ghahraman, Bijan ;
Pourreza-Bilondi, Mohsen ;
Davary, Kamran .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2016, 540 :549-564
[37]   Using self-organizing maps and wavelet transforms for space-time pre-processing of satellite precipitation and runoff data in neural network based rainfall-runoff modeling [J].
Nourani, Vahid ;
Baghanam, Aida Hosseini ;
Adamowski, Jan ;
Gebremichael, Mekonnen .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2013, 476 :228-243
[38]   Uncertainty analysis of downscaling methods in assessing the influence of climate change on hydrology [J].
Ouyang, Fen ;
Lu, Haishen ;
Zhu, Yonghua ;
Zhang, Jianyun ;
Yu, Zhongbo ;
Chen, Xi ;
Li, Min .
STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2014, 28 (04) :991-1010
[39]   A dual-pass error-correction technique for forecasting streamflow [J].
Pagano, T. C. ;
Wang, Q. J. ;
Hapuarachchi, P. ;
Robertson, D. .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2011, 405 (3-4) :367-381
[40]   Does a large number of parameters enhance model performance?: Comparative assessment of common catchment model structures on 429 catchments [J].
Perrin, C ;
Michel, C ;
Andréassian, V .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2001, 242 (3-4) :275-301