Bottom-Up Biases in Feature-Selective Attention

被引:49
作者
Andersen, Soren K. [1 ,2 ]
Mueller, Matthias M. [2 ]
Martinovic, Jasna [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Neurosci, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[2] Univ Leipzig, Inst Psychol, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany
[3] Univ Aberdeen, Sch Psychol, Aberdeen AB24 3UB, Scotland
关键词
HUMAN VISUAL-CORTEX; NORMALIZATION MODEL; NEURAL MECHANISMS; SUPPRESSION; MODULATION; RESPONSES; FIELDS; BRAIN; V4; V2;
D O I
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1767-12.2012
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Previous studies of feature-selective attention have focused on situations in which attention is directed to one of two spatially superimposed stimuli of equal salience. While such overlapping stimuli should maximize stimulus interactions, it is still unknown how bottom-up biases favoring one or the other stimulus influence the efficiency of feature-selective attention. We examined the integration of bottom-up contrast and top-down feature-selection biases on stimulus processing. Two fully overlapping random dot kinematograms (RDKs) of light and dark dots were presented on a gray background of intermediate luminance. On each trial, human participants attended one RDK to detect brief coherent motion targets, while ignoring any events in the unattended RDK. Concurrently, through changes in background luminance, stimulus contrast could be set to five different levels: the stimuli could either be equal, or one of the two stimuli could have twice or four times the contrast of the other stimulus. This manipulation introduced a bottom-up bias toward the stimulus with the higher contrast while keeping the difference between the stimuli constant. Stimulus processing was measured by means of steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs). SSVEP amplitudes generally increased with higher contrast of the driving stimulus. At earlier levels of processing, attention increased the slope of this linear relation, i.e., attention multiplicatively enhanced SSVEP amplitudes. However, at later levels of processing, attention had an additive effect. These effects of attention can be attributed to the differential integration of gain enhancement and inhibitory stimulus competition at different levels of the visual processing hierarchy.
引用
收藏
页码:16953 / 16958
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Behavioral performance follows the time course of neural facilitation and suppression during cued shifts of feature-selective attention [J].
Andersen, S. K. ;
Mueller, M. M. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2010, 107 (31) :13878-13882
[2]  
Andersen S. K., 2011, COGNITIVE NEUROSCIEN, P197
[3]   Effects of Feature-selective and Spatial Attention at Different Stages of Visual Processing [J].
Andersen, Soren K. ;
Fuchs, Sandra ;
Mueller, Matthias M. .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2011, 23 (01) :238-246
[4]   THE PERCEIVED STRENGTH OF MOTION-DEFINED EDGES [J].
BANTON, T ;
LEVI, DM .
PERCEPTION, 1993, 22 (10) :1195-1204
[5]   Attention and visual perception [J].
Boynton, GM .
CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROBIOLOGY, 2005, 15 (04) :465-469
[6]   A backward progression of attentional effects in the ventral stream [J].
Buffalo, Elizabeth A. ;
Fries, Pascal ;
Landman, Rogier ;
Liang, Hualou ;
Desimone, Robert .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2010, 107 (01) :361-365
[7]   EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis [J].
Delorme, A ;
Makeig, S .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 2004, 134 (01) :9-21
[8]   Neural Mechanisms of Selective Visual Attention [J].
Moore, Tirin ;
Zirnsak, Marc .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 68, 2017, 68 :47-72
[9]   Spatiotemporal analysis of the cortical sources of the steady-state visual evoked potential [J].
Di Russo, Francesco ;
Pitzalis, Sabrina ;
Aprile, Teresa ;
Spitoni, Grazia ;
Patria, Fabiana ;
Stella, Alessandra ;
Spinelli, Donatella ;
Hillyard, Steven A. .
HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 2007, 28 (04) :323-334
[10]   Competitive brain activity in visual attention [J].
Duncan, J ;
Humphreys, G ;
Ward, R .
CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROBIOLOGY, 1997, 7 (02) :255-261