Does smoking influence the physical activity and lung cancer relation? A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:27
作者
Schmid, Daniela [1 ]
Ricci, Cristian [1 ]
Behrens, Gundula [1 ]
Leitzmann, Michael F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Regensburg, Dept Epidemiol & Prevent Med, Franz Josef Str Allee 11, D-93053 Regensburg, Germany
关键词
Physical activity; Lung cancer; Meta-analysis; OXIDATIVE STRESS BIOMARKERS; FORCED EXPIRATORY VOLUME; LEISURE-TIME; FOLLOW-UP; RISK; WOMEN; MEN; FORMER; COHORT; DIET;
D O I
10.1007/s10654-016-0186-y
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Research suggests an inverse association between physical activity and lung cancer. However, whether the relation is modified by degree of smoking adjustment has not been summarized. We conducted a meta-analysis of physical activity and lung cancer focusing on evaluating whether smoking status and the degree of smoking adjustment influenced the association. Comparing high versus low physical activity levels from 25 observational studies yielded a lung cancer summary relative risk (RR) of 0.79 [95 % confidence interval (CI) = 0.72-0.87], with RRs of 0.87 (95 % CI = 0.80-0.94) for cohort studies and 0.57 (95 % CI = 0.46-0.71) for case-control studies. In further analyses restricted to cohort studies, physical activity was inversely related to lung cancer among former smokers (RR = 0.68, 95 % CI = 0.51-0.90) and current smokers (RR = 0.80, 95 % CI = 0.70-0.90), whereas the association was null among never smokers (RR = 1.05, 95 % CI = 0.78-1.40, p interaction = 0.26). The degree of smoking adjustment did not modify the association (p interaction = 0.73). Physical activity was unrelated to lung cancer among never smokers but it was inversely associated with lung cancer among former and current smokers. Although the physical activity and lung cancer relation was not modified by smoking status or degree of smoking adjustment, residual confounding by smoking remains a possible explanation for the relations observed.
引用
收藏
页码:1173 / 1190
页数:18
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]   PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY AND RISK OF CANCER IN THE NHANES-I POPULATION [J].
ALBANES, D ;
BLAIR, A ;
TAYLOR, PR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1989, 79 (06) :744-750
[2]  
Alfano CM, 2004, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V13, P2233
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Global recommendations on physical activity for health
[4]   Physical activity and risk for lung cancer in a Danish cohort [J].
Bak, H ;
Christensen, J ;
Thomsen, BL ;
Tjonneland, A ;
Overvad, K ;
Loft, S ;
Raaschou-Nielsen, O .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2005, 116 (03) :439-444
[5]   OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS OF A BANK CORRELATION TEST FOR PUBLICATION BIAS [J].
BEGG, CB ;
MAZUMDAR, M .
BIOMETRICS, 1994, 50 (04) :1088-1101
[6]   PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY ON THE JOB AND CANCER IN MISSOURI [J].
BROWNSON, RC ;
CHANG, JC ;
DAVIS, JR ;
SMITH, CA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1991, 81 (05) :639-642
[7]   Physical activity and the risk of developing lung cancer among smokers: A meta-analysis [J].
Buffart, Laurien M. ;
Singh, Amika S. ;
van Loon, Edwin C. P. ;
Vermeulen, H. Ivan ;
Brug, Johannes ;
Chinapaw, Mai J. M. .
JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND MEDICINE IN SPORT, 2014, 17 (01) :67-71
[8]   Effects of physical activity on exercise tests and respiratory function [J].
Cheng, YJ ;
Macera, CA ;
Addy, CL ;
Sy, FS ;
Wieland, D ;
Blair, SN .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2003, 37 (06) :521-528
[9]   Physical activity and lung cancer risk in male smokers [J].
Colbert, LH ;
Hartman, TJ ;
Tangrea, JA ;
Pietinen, P ;
Virtamo, J ;
Taylor, PR ;
Albanes, D .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2002, 98 (05) :770-773
[10]   Smoking and lung cancer: recent evidence and a discussion of some questions [J].
Cornfield, Jerome ;
Haenszel, William ;
Hammond, E. Cuyler ;
Lilienfeld, Abraham M. ;
Shimkin, Michael B. ;
Wynder, Ernst L. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2009, 38 (05) :1175-1191