Utility of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Suspicion Levels for Detecting Prostate Cancer

被引:156
|
作者
Rais-Bahrami, Soroush [1 ]
Siddiqui, M. Minhaj [1 ]
Turkbey, Baris [2 ]
Stamatakis, Lambros [1 ]
Logan, Jennifer [1 ]
Hoang, Anthony N. [1 ]
Walton-Diaz, Annerleim [1 ]
Vourganti, Srinivas [1 ]
Truong, Hong [1 ]
Kruecker, Jochen [4 ,5 ]
Merino, Maria J. [3 ]
Wood, Bradford J. [4 ]
Choyke, Peter L. [2 ]
Pinto, Peter A. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] NCI, Urol Oncol Branch, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[2] NCI, Mol Imaging Program, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[3] NCI, Pathol Lab, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[4] Natl Canc Inst & Clin Ctr, Ctr Intervent Oncol, NIH, Bethesda, MD USA
[5] Philips Res North America, Briarcliff Manor, NY USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
neoplasm grading; magnetic resonance imaging; digital rectal examination; prostate; biopsy; ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE; ULTRASOUND FUSION; TUMOR VOLUME; BIOPSY; SPECIMENS; MRI;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2013.05.052
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We determine the usefulness of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in detecting prostate cancer, with a specific focus on detecting higher grade prostate cancer. Materials and Methods: Prospectively 583 patients who underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and subsequent prostate biopsy at a single institution were evaluated. On multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, lesions were identified and scored as low, moderate or high suspicion for prostate cancer based on a validated scoring system. Magnetic resonance/ultra-sound fusion guided biopsies of magnetic resonance imaging lesions in addition to systematic 12-core biopsies were performed. Correlations between the highest assigned multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging suspicion score and presence of cancer and biopsy Gleason score on the first fusion biopsy session were assessed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and positive predictive value were calculated and ROC curves were developed to assess the discriminative ability of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging as a diagnostic tool for various biopsy Gleason score cohorts. Results: Significant correlations were found between age, prostate specific antigen, prostate volume, and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging suspicion score and the presence of prostate cancer (p < 0.0001). On multivariate analyses controlling for age, prostate specific antigen and prostate volume, increasing multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging suspicion was an independent prognosticator of prostate cancer detection (OR 2.2, p < 0.0001). Also, incremental increases in multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging suspicion score demonstrated stronger associations with cancer detection in patients with Gleason 7 or greater (OR 3.3, p < 0.001) and Gleason 8 or greater (OR 4.2, p < 0.0001) prostate cancer. Assessing multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging as a diagnostic tool for all prostate cancer, biopsy Gleason score 7 or greater, and biopsy Gleason score 8 or greater separately via ROC analyses demonstrated increasing accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for higher grade disease (AUC 0.64, 0.69, and 0.72, respectively). Conclusions: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging is a clinically useful modality to detect and characterize prostate cancer, particularly in men with higher grade disease.
引用
收藏
页码:1721 / 1727
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] MULTIPARAMETRIC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING IN PROSTATE CANCER DETECTION
    Garcia-Cruz, Eduardo
    Ramon-Barcelo, Catalina
    Carrion-Puig, Ramon
    Alcaraz, Antonio
    ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA, 2019, 72 (04): : 374 - 380
  • [12] Use of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer active surveillance
    Glass, Allison S.
    Dall'Era, Marc A.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 124 (05) : 730 - 737
  • [13] Evaluation of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Detection and Prediction of Prostate Cancer
    Wang, Rui
    Wang, He
    Zhao, Chenglin
    Hu, Juan
    Jiang, Yuanyuan
    Tong, Yanjun
    Liu, Ting
    Huang, Rong
    Wang, Xiaoying
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (06):
  • [14] Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer
    An, Julie Y.
    Sidana, Abhinav
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Wood, Bradford J.
    Pinto, Peter A.
    Turkbey, Ismail Baris
    BALKAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 34 (05) : 388 - 396
  • [15] Who Benefits from Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging After Suspicion of Prostate Cancer?
    Morote, Juan
    Celma, Anna
    Roche, Sarai
    de Torres, Ines M.
    Mast, Richard
    Semedey, Maria E.
    Regis, Lucas
    Planas, Jacques
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2019, 2 (06): : 664 - 669
  • [16] What kind of prostate cancers do we miss on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging?
    De Visschere, Pieter Julien Luc
    Naesens, Leslie
    Libbrecht, Louis
    Van Praet, Charles
    Lumen, Nicolaas
    Fonteyne, Valerie
    Pattyn, Eva
    Villeirs, Geert
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2016, 26 (04) : 1098 - 1107
  • [17] Role of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer
    Rais-Bahrami, Soroush
    Turkbey, Baris
    Grant, Kinzya B.
    Pinto, Peter A.
    Choyke, Peter L.
    CURRENT UROLOGY REPORTS, 2014, 15 (03)
  • [18] Role of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Predicting Pathologic Outcomes in Prostate Cancer
    Harland, Niklas
    Stenzl, Arnulf
    Todenhoefer, Tilman
    WORLD JOURNAL OF MENS HEALTH, 2021, 39 (01) : 38 - 47
  • [19] Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate - a basic tutorial
    Cabarrus, Miguel C.
    Westphalen, Antonio C.
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2017, 6 (03) : 376 - 386
  • [20] The Diagnostic Performance of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Detect Significant Prostate Cancer
    Thompson, J. E.
    van Leeuwen, P. J.
    Moses, D.
    Shnier, R.
    Brenner, P.
    Delprado, W.
    Pulbrook, M.
    Boehm, M.
    Haynes, A. M.
    Hayen, A.
    Stricker, P. D.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (05) : 1428 - 1435