Aquifer response to surface water transience in disconnected streams

被引:32
作者
Shanafield, Margaret [1 ]
Cook, Peter G. [1 ,2 ]
Brunner, Philip [3 ]
McCallum, James [1 ]
Simmons, Craig T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Flinders Univ S Australia, Natl Ctr Groundwater Res & Training, Sch Environm, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
[2] Commonwealth Sci & Ind Res Org, Div Land & Water, Water Hlth Country Natl Res Flagship, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[3] Ctr Hydrogeol & Geotherm, Neuchatel, Switzerland
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会; 瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
STREAM/AQUIFER INTERACTION; ZONE FLOW; GROUNDWATER; RECHARGE; RETENTION; MODFLOW; MODEL;
D O I
10.1029/2012WR012103
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Existing analytical solutions to determine aquifer response to a change in stream stage are inappropriate where an unsaturated zone exists beneath the stream, as in the case of disconnected stream-aquifer systems. A better understanding of the relationship between aquifer response and transient stream stage in disconnected systems is therefore required, as this would also aid in the field determination of the status of connection between the stream and aquifer. We use a numerical model to examine transient stream stage and the corresponding water table response. Beneath disconnected streams, the magnitude of head change in the water table level is a balance between the cumulative infiltration during a flow event and the rate at which the water can disperse laterally. Increases in wave duration, stream width, and streambed permeability result in greater infiltrated water volume and therefore a higher peak response at the water table. Conversely, higher aquifer transmissivity and aquifer hydraulic conductivity allow the water to move laterally away from the stream faster, resulting in a smaller head change below the stream. Lower unsaturated storage results in a greater and faster aquifer response because the unsaturated zone can fill more quickly. Under some combinations of parameters, the magnitude of the disconnected head response is more than seven times greater than the change in stream stage driving streambed infiltration; an effect which can never occur beneath a connected stream. The results of this sensitivity analysis are compared to field data from a river in eastern Australia to determine periods of disconnection. Where the change in aquifer head is greater than the change in stream stage, disconnection between the stream and aquifer can be determined.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Aquifer response to stream-stage and recharge variations. II. Convolution method and applications [J].
Barlow, PM ;
DeSimone, LA ;
Moench, AF .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2000, 230 (3-4) :211-229
[2]  
Brunke M, 1999, INT REV HYDROBIOL, V84, P99
[3]   Disconnected Surface Water and Groundwater: From Theory to Practice [J].
Brunner, Philip ;
Cook, Peter G. ;
Simmons, Craig T. .
GROUND WATER, 2011, 49 (04) :460-467
[4]   Modeling Surface Water-Groundwater Interaction with MODFLOW: Some Considerations [J].
Brunner, Philip ;
Simmons, Craig T. ;
Cook, Peter G. ;
Therrien, Rene .
GROUND WATER, 2010, 48 (02) :174-180
[5]   Spatial and temporal aspects of the transition from connection to disconnection between rivers, lakes and groundwater [J].
Brunner, Philip ;
Simmons, Craig T. ;
Cook, Peter G. .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2009, 376 (1-2) :159-169
[6]   Hydrogeologic controls on disconnection between surface water and groundwater [J].
Brunner, Philip ;
Cook, Peter G. ;
Simmons, Craig T. .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2009, 45
[7]   DEVELOPING JOINT PROBABILITY-DISTRIBUTIONS OF SOIL-WATER RETENTION CHARACTERISTICS [J].
CARSEL, RF ;
PARRISH, RS .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1988, 24 (05) :755-769
[8]   Effects of stream-aquifer disconnection on local flow patterns [J].
Desilets, Sharon L. E. ;
Ferre, Ty P. A. ;
Troch, Peter A. .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2008, 44 (09)
[9]   River-aquifer interactions, geologic heterogeneity, and low-flow management [J].
Fleckenstein, Jan H. ;
Niswonger, Richard G. ;
Fogg, Graham E. .
GROUND WATER, 2006, 44 (06) :837-852
[10]   Unsaturated hyporheic zone flow in stream/aquifer conjunctive systems [J].
Fox, GA ;
Durnford, DS .
ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 2003, 26 (09) :989-1000