Screening for depressed mood in an adolescent psychiatric context by brief self-assessment scales - testing psychometric validity of WHO-5 and BDI-6 indices by latent trait analyses

被引:83
作者
Blom, Eva Henje [1 ,2 ]
Bech, Per [3 ]
Hogberg, Goran [1 ]
Larsson, Jan Olov [4 ]
Serlachius, Eva [1 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Dept Clin Neurosci, S-17177 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Mental Hlth Ctr N Zealand, Psychiat Res Unit, DK-3400 Hillerod, Denmark
[3] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Dept Womens & Childrens Hlth, S-17176 Stockholm, Sweden
[4] Karolinska Inst, Dept Womens & Childrens Hlth, S-17177 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
Well-being; Adolescent major depressive disorder; Rasch analyses; Mokken analyses; Brief self-assessment scales; BDI-6; WHO-5; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1186/1477-7525-10-149
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Major depressive disorder is prevalent in the adolescent psychiatric clinical setting and often comorbid with other primary psychiatric diagnoses such as ADHD or social anxiety disorder. Systematic manual-based diagnostic procedures are recommended to identify such comorbidity but they are time-consuming and often not fully implemented in clinical practice. Screening for depressive symptoms in the child psychiatric context using brief, user-friendly and easily managed self-assessment scales may be of clinical value and utility. The aim of the study is to test the psychometric validity of two such scales, which may be used in a two-step screening procedure, the WHO-Five Well-being Index (WHO-5) and the six-item version of Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI-6). Method: 66 adolescent psychiatric patients with a clinical diagnosis of major depressive disorder (MDD), 60 girls and 6 boys, aged 14-18 years, mean age 16.8 years, completed the WHO-5 scale as well as the BDI-6. Statistical validity was tested by Mokken and Rasch analyses. Results: The correlation between WHO-5 and BDI-6 was -0.49 (p=0.0001). Mokken analyses showed a coefficient of homogeneity for the WHO-5 of 0.52 and for the BDI-6 of 0.46. Rasch analysis also accepted unidimensionality when testing males versus females (p>0.05). Conclusions: The WHO-5 is psychometrically valid in an adolescent psychiatric context including both genders to assess the wellness dimension and applicable as a first step in screening for MDD. The BDI-6 may be recommended as a second step in the screening procedure, since it is statistically valid and has the ability to unidimensionally capture the severity of depressed mood.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Angold A, 1999, J CHILD PSYCHOL PSYC, V40, P57, DOI 10.1111/1469-7610.00424
[2]   The WHO (Ten) well-being index: Validation in diabetes [J].
Bech, P ;
Gudex, C ;
Johansen, KS .
PSYCHOTHERAPY AND PSYCHOSOMATICS, 1996, 65 (04) :183-190
[3]   Measuring well-being rather than the absence of distress symptoms: A comparison of the SF-36 mental health subscale and the WHO-Five well-being scale [J].
Bech, P ;
Olsen, LR ;
Kjoller, M ;
Rasmussen, NK .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF METHODS IN PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2003, 12 (02) :85-91
[4]   The clinical effect of clomipramine in chronic idiopathic pain disorder revisited using the Spielberger State Anxiety Symptom Scale (SSASS) as outcome scale [J].
Bech, Per ;
Gormsen, Lise ;
Loldrup, Dorte ;
Lunde, Marianne .
JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2009, 119 (1-3) :43-51
[5]   AN INVENTORY FOR MEASURING DEPRESSION [J].
BECK, AT ;
ERBAUGH, J ;
WARD, CH ;
MOCK, J ;
MENDELSOHN, M .
ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY, 1961, 4 (06) :561-&
[6]   The differentiation between depressive and anxious adolescent females and controls by behavioural self-rating scales [J].
Blom, Eva Henje ;
Larsson, Jan-Olov ;
Serlachius, Eva ;
Ingvar, Martin .
JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2010, 122 (03) :232-240
[7]  
DA JR, 2009, THEORY PRACTICE ITEM
[8]  
Greenberg G., 2010, MANUFACTURING DEPRES
[9]   Evaluating composite health measures using Rasch modelling: an illustrative example [J].
Hagquist, C .
SOZIAL-UND PRAVENTIVMEDIZIN, 2001, 46 (06) :369-378
[10]   The psychometric properties of the self-reported SDQ - An analysis of Swedish data based on the Rasch model [J].
Hagquist, Curt .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2007, 43 (05) :1289-1301