Measuring the environmental efficiency of countries: A directional distance function metafrontier approach

被引:46
作者
Lin, Eugene Yu-Ying [1 ]
Chen, Ping-Yu [1 ]
Chen, Chi-Chung [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Chung Hsing Univ, Dept Appl Econ, Taichung 40227, Taiwan
关键词
Environmental efficiency; Directional distance function; Metafrontier; MULTILATERAL PRODUCTIVITY COMPARISONS; UNDESIRABLE OUTPUTS; TECHNOLOGY; POLLUTION; COST; PERFORMANCE; INDUSTRY; FIRMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.01.015
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper measures environmental efficiency (EE) in 63 countries over the period 1981-2005 and analyzes whether the adoption of the Kyoto Protocol is accompanied by an increase in environmental efficiency during the same period. Differences in EE across countries under distinct country-specific production frontiers are measured using a directional distance function model, which incorporates a desirable output (GDP) and an undesirable output (CO2 emissions). It is further assumed that a stochastic meta-technology-frontier exists and represents potential outputs available to all countries given inputs. The metafrontier for four country groups, high income countries, upper-middle income countries, low-middle income countries, and low income countries, are estimated using balanced panel data for the sample countries over the study period. The overall results indicate that the four country groups operated under distinct stochastic production frontiers and therefore used different production technologies. It is found that high income countries achieved the highest progress in their average environmental efficiency relative to the metafrontier, while lower-middle income countries and low income countries recorded negative growth in their average EE relative to the metafrontier. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:134 / 142
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Atkinson S. E., 2011, 12 EUR WORKSH EFF PR
[2]   Bayesian measurement of productivity and efficiency in the presence of undesirable outputs: crediting electric utilities for reducing air pollution [J].
Atkinson, SE ;
Dorfman, JH .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2005, 126 (02) :445-468
[3]   A metafrontier production function for estimation of technical efficiencies and technology gaps for firms operating under different technologies [J].
Battese, GE ;
Rao, DSP ;
O'Donnell, CJ .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 2004, 21 (01) :91-103
[4]  
Beltran-Esteve M., 2012, WPAE1206 U VAL
[5]   The impact of environmental constraints on productivity improvement in integrated paper plants [J].
Boyd, GA ;
McClelland, JD .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1999, 38 (02) :121-142
[6]   Productivity and undesirable outputs: A directional distance function approach [J].
Chung, YH ;
Fare, R ;
Grosskopf, S .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1997, 51 (03) :229-240
[7]   The price of pollution: A dual approach to valuing SO2 allowances [J].
Coggins, JS ;
Swinton, JR .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1996, 30 (01) :58-72
[8]  
CROPPER ML, 1992, J ECON LIT, V30, P675
[9]   Characteristics of a polluting technology:: theory and practice [J].
Färe, R ;
Grosskopf, S ;
Noh, DW ;
Weber, W .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2005, 126 (02) :469-492
[10]   An activity analysis model of the environmental performance of firms - Application to fossil-fuel-fired electric utilities [J].
Fare, R ;
Grosskopf, S ;
Tyteca, D .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1996, 18 (02) :161-175