Half of Cochrane reviews were published more than 2 years after the protocol

被引:15
作者
Andersen, Mikkel Zola [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Gulen, Sengul [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Fonnes, Siv [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Andresen, Kristoffer [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Rosenberg, Jacob [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Herlev Hosp, Dept Surg, Ctr Perioperat Optimizat, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, DK-2730 Herlev, Denmark
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Gentofte Hosp, Dept Surg, Ctr Perioperat Optimizat, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, DK-2730 Herlev, Denmark
[3] Herlev Hosp, Cochrane Colorectal Grp, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, DK-2730 Herlev, Denmark
关键词
Publication time; Cochrane; Systematic review; Review protocol; Review process; Methodology; SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS; QUALITY; METAANALYSES; EPIDEMIOLOGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.05.011
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: The objective of the study is to examine the time from publication of the protocol for a Cochrane review to publication of the Cochrane review for the entire Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR). Study Design and Settings: Cochrane reviews from the CDSR published between 1995 and 2019 were assessed. Characteristics of the reviews were extracted, and time from publication of protocol to publication of review was calculated. These times were grouped for relevant characteristics and visualized through charts and tables to illustrate trends. Results: Of the total 8,201 reviews in the CDSR, 6,764 were included. The median publication time was 2 years (range 0 days to 21.7 years). Reviews that were published more than 5 years after the protocol made up 11% of all included reviews, whereas 19% of reviews were published within a year. The median publication time for the individual Cochrane Review Groups ranged from 15 to 39 months. Conclusion: Half of Cochrane reviews were published later than Cochrane's aim of 2 years. Furthermore, the Cochrane Review Groups' median times from publication of protocol to publication of review varied widely. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / 93
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Interventions for postoperative pain in children: An overview of systematic reviews
    Boric, Krste
    Dosenovic, Svjetlana
    Kadic, Antonia Jelicic
    Batinic, Marijan
    Cavar, Marija
    Urlic, Marjan
    Markovina, Nikolina
    Puljak, Livia
    [J]. PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2017, 27 (09) : 893 - 904
  • [2] Champion Chris, 2020, COCHRANE AUTHOR SATI
  • [3] Cochrane Community, 2014, PUBL FREQ PUBL READ
  • [4] Cochrane Community, PROP REG NEW COCHR R
  • [5] Cochrane Library, 2019, COCHR REV GROUPS NET
  • [6] Cochrane Library, 2019, COCHR DAT SYST REV A
  • [7] Cochrane Library, 2019, Cochrane database of systematic reviews
  • [8] Cochrane Skin Group systematic reviews are more methodotogically rigorous than other systematic reviews in dermatotogy
    Collier, A.
    Heilig, L.
    Schilling, L.
    Williams, H.
    Dellavalle, R. P.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2006, 155 (06) : 1230 - 1235
  • [9] The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: An independent appraisal
    Delaney, Anthony
    Bagshaw, Sean M.
    Ferland, Andre
    Laupland, Kevin
    Manns, Braden
    Doig, Christopher
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2007, 35 (02) : 589 - 594
  • [10] Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews in leading orthodontic journals: a quality paradigm?
    Fleming, Padhraig S.
    Seehra, Jadbinder
    Polychronopoulou, Argy
    Fedorowicz, Zbys
    Pandis, Nikolaos
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2013, 35 (02) : 244 - 248