Biosphere risk assessment for CO2 storage projects

被引:5
作者
Bowden, Adrian R. [1 ]
Pershke, Donna F. [2 ]
Chalaturnyk, Rick [3 ]
机构
[1] URS Corp, Southbank, Vic 3006, Australia
[2] URS Corp, Perth, WA 6000, Australia
[3] Univ Alberta, Nat Resources Engn Facil, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Edmonton, AB T6G 2W2, Canada
关键词
Biosphere; Risk assessment; Methodology; Environment; Community;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.02.015
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The aim of this paper is to describe the methodology developed to link the quantitative outputs of the geosphere risk assessment to the semi-quantitative assessment of risk to the biosphere. It also shows how good practice stakeholder engagement principles can be incorporated into the risk assessment process to achieve transparency in project decision making. The objective of the biosphere risk assessment portion of the Weyburn-Midale Project was to develop a risk assessment methodology that can be applied to a range of CO2 storage projects. Preliminary modelling of potential biosphere impacts associated with the Weyburn-Midale Project was undertaken to enable the risk assessment methodology to be tested and to demonstrate the nature of the biosphere risk assessment outputs, and how the process and outputs can be used to facilitate stakeholder acceptance. The method to assess the biosphere risk at the Weyburn-Midale Project uses the outputs (pathways, likelihoods and CO2 mass) from geosphere risk assessment to identify the general physical and chemical effects on the fundamental biosphere components (groundwater, surface water, soil, air) and the consequential impacts on organisms, habitat, amenity and public safety. The approach applies an existing environmental impact assessment methodology to derive outputs that stakeholders can use to assess the risk and impacts to environmental assets. The outcomes of biosphere risk assessment are used to: develop risk mitigation strategies and future monitoring options; understand whether the project will likely have unacceptable impacts on safety or valued community assets; decide whether the project should proceed; and to assist engagement with regulators and the community. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:S291 / S308
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Assessment of oil and gas fields in California as potential CO2 storage sites
    Kim, Tae Wook
    Callas, Catherine
    Saltzer, Sarah D.
    Kovscek, Anthony R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2022, 114
  • [42] Risk from CO2 storage in saline aquifers: a comparison of lay and expert perceptions of risk
    Mander, Sarah
    Polson, Debbie
    Roberts, Thomas
    Curtis, Andrew
    10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, 2011, 4 : 6360 - 6367
  • [43] An integrated approach for risk assessment of CO2 infrastructure in the COCATE project
    Kvien, Knut
    Flach, Todd
    Solomon, Semere
    Napoles, Oswaldo Morales
    Hulsbosch-Dam, Corina
    Spruijt, Mark
    GHGT-11, 2013, 37 : 2932 - 2940
  • [44] CO2 Pipeline risk assessment and comparison for the midcontinent United States
    Duguid, Andrew
    Hawkins, Jared
    Keister, Laura
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2022, 116
  • [45] An approach of quantitative risk assessment for release of supercritical CO2 pipelines
    Teng, Lin
    Liu, Xiong
    Li, Xigui
    Li, Yuxing
    Lu, Cheng
    JOURNAL OF NATURAL GAS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2021, 94
  • [46] Strategic Qualitative Risk Assessment of Thousands of Legacy Wells within the Area of Review (AoR) of a Potential CO2 Storage Site
    Arbad, Nachiket
    Watson, Marshall
    Emadi, Hossein
    Eyitayo, Stella
    Leggett, Smith
    MINERALS, 2024, 14 (04)
  • [47] Large scale modeling and assessment of the feasibility of CO2 storage onshore Abu Dhabi
    Ajayi, Temitope
    Awolayo, Adedapo
    Gomes, Jorge S.
    Parra, Humberto
    Hu, Jialiang
    ENERGY, 2019, 185 : 653 - 670
  • [48] A contribution to risk analysis for leakage through abandoned wells in geological CO2 storage
    Kopp, Andreas
    Binning, P. J.
    Johannsen, K.
    Helmig, R.
    Class, H.
    ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 2010, 33 (08) : 867 - 879
  • [49] METSTOR: a GIS to look for potential CO2 storage zones in France
    Bonijoly, D.
    Ha-Duong, M.
    Leynet, A.
    Bonneville, A.
    Broseta, D.
    Fradet, A.
    Le Gallo, Y.
    Munier, G.
    Lagny, C.
    Lagneau, V.
    Auzende, A. -L.
    Berthiaud, J.
    Bialkowski, A.
    Bossie-Codreanu, D.
    Brosse, E.
    Bureau, G.
    Campos, A. -S.
    Fillacier, S.
    Nedelec, B.
    Pokryszka, Z.
    Rambourg, D.
    Rigollet, C.
    Roux, P.
    Saysset, S.
    GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES 9, 2009, 1 (01): : 2809 - 2816
  • [50] Leakage and pressurization risk assessment of CO2 reservoirs: A metamodeling modeling approach
    Guyant, Ethan
    Han, Weon Shik
    Kim, Kue-Young
    Park, Eungyu
    Yun, Seong-Taek
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2016, 54 : 345 - 361